User talk:Anishwiki12

Welcome!

Hello, Anishwiki12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 04:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apache Marmotta[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12,

Thanks for your feedback, I am looking to improve my editorial skills and I am looking for this kind of interactions.

I removed the proposed delete of the Apache Marmotta page because it's about a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation notable as or more than many included in the List of Apache Software Foundation projects.

Of course let me know if think some sections should be expanded (I see that other people have contributed).

Thanks.

--Devbug (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Schaffert[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12,

Thanks again for your feedback.

I removed the proposed deletion of the page Sebastian Schaffert, because the person is a notable researcher and a public figure in his field (Semantic Web, Linked Data); his works have been cited more than 1.800 times and his peers are also on Wikipedia.

I surely need to improve the publications section which looks a bit rough.

Thanks --Devbug (talk) 12:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Corsico[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12,

Thanks again for your feedback. I would like to remove the coi tag on the page Fabio Corsico, as I believe is neutral and I don't have a close connection with the subject (it's a well-known figure in Italy). Is there something specific that you see as not neutral?

Thanks! --Devbug (talk) 12:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Hadley[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12,

Thanks for your feedback on my created page.

I am going to remove your comment on the proposed deletion of the page of David Hadley, because the person is notable as a politician of American Republican Party, a very well-known social worker, a good writer. Mr. Hadley is going to represent the people of California's 66th State Assembly district in the South Bay, Los Angeles in 2014. I think, he is qualified for being in Wikipedia and I will definitely improve the content to make it more neutral, non-advertising. I have already edited the content for making it more compatible with Wikipedia.

Hope you will consider the issue.

Thank you once again.

Mindsetup (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Susan Gilbert[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Susan Gilbert, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Run Sheldon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Run Sheldon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run Sheldon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Gary Douglas[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12. I am requesting you to remove the tag of nomination for deletion of Gary Douglas page. He is a famous author of 10 books in different psychological, inspirational, human relationships. He is notable enough to be in the Wikipedia. I will improve the contents and will make it more compatible to Wikipedia with time. Please consider the issue. Thank you. Mindsetup (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion/Katrina Starzhynskaya[edit]

Hello Anishwiki12. Thanks for your feedback. Katrina Starzhynskaya is a famous author originated from Belarus and settled in USA now. She fought against serious illness of her and now working as an inspirational person and fitness coach. She has enough notability to be in the Wikipedia and the used references are verifiable and notable too. I have already made some edits and deleted some contents. Thanks. Mindsetup (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Hadley & Katrina Starzhynskaya[edit]

Hi Anishwiki12! I noticed that you had nominated both of these articles for deletion. However, it seems that you didn't complete the nomination, so the two articles didn't appear in the AfD debates, and didn't end up being closed. I have now deleted both articles, as the creator was using a new account to evade a block. In the case of the AfD for Katrina Starzhynskaya, no one else had left a comment, so I removed the deletion discussion. With David Hadley there was a second comment, so I transcribed it to the deletion log, and then deleted it. Thanks for spotting there two articles!

If you aren't using it, I'd recommend that you add Wikipedia:Twinkle. It's great! It has a very simple process for nominating pages for deletion, as well as a lot of additional features that can be a great help when editing. - Bilby (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 12:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adryenn Ashley for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adryenn Ashley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adryenn Ashley (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Run Sheldon concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Run Sheldon, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Run Sheldon[edit]

Hello, Anishwiki12. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Run Sheldon".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TouchMail[edit]

The article TouchMail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability concerns have not been addressed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TouchMail for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TouchMail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TouchMail (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 18:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]