User talk:Anna2123456789

Welcome!

Hello, Anna2123456789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Philip Graham Scott, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JamesBWatson (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Graham Scott[edit]

A tag has been placed on Philip Graham Scott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Phillip Graham Scott[edit]

I have nominated Phillip Graham Scott, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Graham Scott. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cynof Gavuf 10:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Joe Maw[edit]

I have nominated Joe Maw, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Maw (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cynof Gavuf 10:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Maw[edit]

A tag has been placed on Joe Maw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cynof Gavuf 10:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Joe Maw. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Phillip Graham Scott. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Maw, you will be blocked from editing. Cynof Gavuf 06:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Joe Maw, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate articles previously deleted[edit]

...at a deletion discussion. If the circumstances of the subject change and you believe he then meets our inclusion guidelines, I advise you take it to deletion review. J Milburn (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Maw[edit]

A tag has been placed on Joe Maw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Claudia Colling has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ka renjc 19:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snapshot 58e0583c 78e0583d.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snapshot 58e0583c 78e0583d.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The leftorium 19:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:London_2009_007.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:London_2009_007.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:London 2009 013.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:London 2009 013.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. • ɔ ʃ → 20:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Howle Newcastle summer 2009.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carmen Howle Newcastle summer 2009.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. • ɔ ʃ → 20:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Armen newcatle2009.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Armen newcatle2009.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. • ɔ ʃ → 20:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristal Lau[edit]

The article Kristal Lau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find significant coverage for this actress.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 21:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Carmen_Howle_Newcastle_summer_2009.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carmen_Howle_Newcastle_summer_2009.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kristal Lau[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kristal Lau. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristal Lau. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phillip Graham Scott[edit]

A tag has been placed on Phillip Graham Scott, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Replace this image' template[edit]

Please do not add the "replace this image" template to biography articles as the template is no longer used. Please see this discussion for additional information. If you would like to request an image to be added to a biography article, please go to the talk page and add the needs-photo=yes parameter to the biography project banner. An example can be found here. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 17:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anna - I'm going to ask you again, politely, to please stop adding the deprecated "replace this image" template to articles against consensus. I've advised how to properly add a photo request to article talk pages above, please use this format in the future. Please also ensure that any information you add to articles is reliably sourced or it may be removed. Thank you --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 17:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring information or templates to an article against concensus is considered disruptive editing. If you continue to add this template without regard for consensus and without discussion you could be blocked from editing. I undestand that you are likely a younger editor and may not completely understand how things work around here, but you have had several individuals point out how Wikipedia works and the expectations with regard to editing articles and there has been no acknowledgement or discussion on your part. I strongly advise that you take a break from editing until you have a chance to read the information and advice given on this page. There are many people here who would be happy to help you with regard to editing, however you cannot continue to simply edit and create articles in your chosen format without regard to concensus, policy, and guidelines. Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 16:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Anna - As has been requested previously, please ensure that any information you add to articles is reliably sourced. You are adding the school year that some child actor happens to be in without sources - this is both a violation of WP:RS and the Manual of Style which states "Avoid statements that will age quickly". Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Amy-Leigh Hickman[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Amy-Leigh Hickman. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy-Leigh Hickman. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of one month, for I've had to impose this block because your editing is disruptive; you don't talk to anyone about the advice they've given you, and you do not seem to be learning the way we do things here. Please take this break to look at some articles and see how they are written.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 19:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This block could be reduced if you show willingness to learn some lessons and ask people. Rodhull andemu 19:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carmen Howle Newcastle summer 2009.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carmen Howle Newcastle summer 2009.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

June 2010[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for using an IP address to edit, evading your block (you couldn't wait just another 4 days, could you?) is absolutely not permitted. Even more so, returning to the same disruptive editing pattern that got you blocked in the first place would have got you another block anyway.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 18:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Anna2123456789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

62.31.196.31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Block evasion: Disruptive editing

Blocking administrator: Rodhullandemu (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Pretty obvious that you weren't autoblocked — Smashville^talk 19:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Helena Barlow[edit]

The article Helena Barlow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RamonaMarquezNationalMovieAwards.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RamonaMarquezNationalMovieAwards.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RamonaMarquezandFreyaWilson.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:RamonaMarquezandFreyaWilson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Coekon (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ramonamarquezshrektheopeningnight.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ramonamarquezshrektheopeningnight.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramonamarquezshrektheopeningnight.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ramonamarquezshrektheopeningnight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RamonaMarquez.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RamonaMarquez.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RamonaMarquezArthurChristmasPremire.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RamonaMarquezArthurChristmasPremire.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images[edit]

You have received many many warnings on this talkoage regarding the uploading of non-free images. It is very important, critical actually, that you understand what constitutes fair use with regard to Wikipedia's licensing and permissions policy. You cannot simply download an image from a website, save it on your computer, then upload it to Wikipedia for use. The website must explicitly state that it is compatible with Wikipedia's licensing terms. Please read Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Please do not continue uploading any files until you are positive you understand these policies. If you continue to upload non-free content despite all of these warnings, your account will be blocked again. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RamonaQuimbySarahPolley.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RamonaQuimbySarahPolley.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RamonaQuimbyJoeyKing.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RamonaQuimbyJoeyKing.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RamonaQuimbySarahPolley.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RamonaQuimbySarahPolley.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CarmenHowleSeries2.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CarmenHowleSeries2.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy Beaker[edit]

Hello - I apologise for my late reply. I do not know when I will find the time to do some work on Tracy Beaker related articles. It is, however, a goal for the future. Thank you so much for your message. (Galaxycat (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Userbox removed[edit]

Hi, Anna2123456789, you'll likely not be pleased about this, but I have suppressed a number of your edits which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your edits.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Anna2123456789/Kia Pegg has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kia Pegg, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kia Pegg.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm TheJJJunk. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Curtain Up (novel) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JJJ (talk) 16:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CarmenHseries3.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CarmenHseries3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Four Children and It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Heart's Desire and Jack and Jill

Adrianna Bertola (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Breakfast (TV program)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matilda Wormwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Sandstein. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kerry Ingram, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sandstein 23:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BelleDingle2011.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BelleDingle2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:31, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Josie Griffiths[edit]

Hi, I'm Dom497. Anna2123456789, thanks for creating Josie Griffiths!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, please replace all bare url's in the article with one of the reference templates to meet Wikipedia's standards/policy. Also, if possible, please expand the article. Thank-you

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Replaceable fair use File:Adrianna Bertola.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Adrianna Bertola.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. David 1217 ^{What I've done} 16:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning[edit]

You have again uploaded an image under fair use rationale that does not meet fair use criteria. You cannot use screencaps and stills from television shows and movies and use them in the biography articles of the individual's who portray the character depicted. The amount of copyright warnings (and final warnings) that have gone unheeded on this page is simply unacceptable. If you continue to violate Wikipedia copyright policy you will be blocked. I strongly suggest you either find a mentor to help you or you cease uploading images altogether. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Anna2123456789. You have new messages at OrenBochman's talk page.
Message added 09:32, 11 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your request for mentoring has been accepted! BO | Talk 09:32, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get Started![edit]

Hi Anna

I've been working on my adoption HQ this week and I have created a page for you, it is at User:OrenBochman/Adoption/Anna2123456789. I'll be adding lots of material in the coming weeks - some especially setup to instruct you. BO | Talk 16:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Sandstein. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Kerry Ingram, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sandstein 12:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's learn about Copyright![edit]

Hi Anna!

I've added a unit on Copyright at User:OrenBochman/Adoption/Anna2123456789. please review it.
Regarding the above note. It looks like you are cooperating nicely with Sandstein on the article on Kerry Ingram. Doing research on the net is a good idea. Your edit was reverted for a couple of reasons. First of all you did not back the fact you added with a good citation. I also did a google search and found an article about another Kerry Ingram but this one was a baby and not the one in the article. So it looks like Sandstein not only fixed the mistake but took some time to updated you. Anyhow I suggest you drop to Sandstein talk page and leave a note - that way people realize that when you make mistakes you read their comments and that you are trying to improve your skills. BO | Talk 00:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna

Try to answer the question I posted on your adoption page, and then we can discuss issues related to images you upload. For example what would be better fair use notices for images like: File:MaraWMatilda1996.png. BO | Talk 22:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lily Laight[edit]

The article Lily Laight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. One source does nothing but show that someone of this name was born at the time and place specified, and the others are both limited local coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chloe Hawthorn[edit]

The article Chloe Hawthorn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. Not a single reference is substantial coverage in an independent source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lara Wollington[edit]

The article Lara Wollington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. Not a single reference is substantial coverage in an independent source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hidi Ho - Hello![edit]

Hi I've noticed you have run into some difficulties. I have deproded the articles and if you want we can try to work out the problems and save them from getting deleted ever! But you need to work with me this time! BO | Talk 04:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sorry for late reply yes thanks for that--Anna2123456789 (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are not too late - but these are a bunch of stuff we got to do.

I have a unit on deletion which you should cover and
once it is done we can chat about what can be done in each deletion situation for each of the articles,
then we can work out what should be improved
finally you need to learn how to respond.

P.S. You did not do the test on copyright. What was the problem, I thought you are interested in law - was it too difficult ?

P.S.S. Anna if you are not interested in mentoring let me know as well and I wont trouble you no more. BO | Talk 16:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I am, but I have been very busy I've had some exams going on. With the interest in law consumer protection and entertainment law is my thing I have some spare time coming next week. Also I have a project at school so I might be very busy, but I will make time. --Anna2123456789 (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

Hi Anna I hope your exams are going well.

The adoption processes requires the adoptee to work towards graduation. I see that you are not very active on Wikipedia in the last few months.

Let me know if you are interested in further mentoring or help in the future. If not I will place you in a retired student status. BO | Talk 14:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kia Pegg concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kia Pegg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Kia Pegg[edit]

Hello Anna2123456789. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kia Pegg.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kia Pegg}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Cheer up, dude! :)

MaRAno ^FAN 07:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MaraWMatilda1996.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MaraWMatilda1996.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thematildathemusicaloriginalmatildas.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thematildathemusicaloriginalmatildas.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BelleDingle2011.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BelleDingle2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thank you for your contributions! Your work has not gone unnoticed! I hope the kitty makes you feel warm and fuzzy!

Tea with toast (話) 23:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Cleo Demetriou page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Anna2123456789. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Poppy Lee Friar, from its old location at User:Anna2123456789/Poppy Lee Friar. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 16:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poppy Lee Friar (August 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poppy Lee Friar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 03:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Anna2123456789, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 03:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Anna2123456789. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Poppy Lee Friar concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Poppy Lee Friar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Poppy Lee Friar[edit]

Hello, Anna2123456789. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poppy Lee Friar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Anna2123456789. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Anna2123456789. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babes in the Woods murder (Wild Park).jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BelleDingle2011.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BelleDingle2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]