User talk:Ansh666/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

FYI

[1] PantherLeapord (talk) 09:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Check this out

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Mahjong. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Future Korean War

Hi. Thanks for the tip off. Will check out the new discussion. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Survey on Talk:Do_not_feed_the_animals: confusing answer?

First, thanks for your continuing support on deleting/moving Do not feed the animals.

Second, I see that you responded to the survey at Talk:Do_not_feed_the_animals, but the survey questions were confusing, and I think you voted "yes" when you meant to vote "no". I've clarified (I hope) the survey question without changing it's real meaning; would you review your answer and make sure it's what you meant to say?

Thanks again, Dan Griscom (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

disturbing username

Your username seems to contain the number of the beast as a substring. You may wish to post a request on Wikipedia:Changing username to change it to something more appropriate. Ansh890 is currently available. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
35	Casualties of the Libyan civil war (talk)	Add sources
3,764	Procurement (talk)	Add sources
51	Free Libyan Air Force (talk)	Add sources
231	History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi (talk)	Add sources
1,882	Jihad (talk)	Add sources
2,619	Collagen (talk)	Add sources
17	Timeline of the Libyan civil war before military intervention (talk)	Cleanup
13	Maulana Naeem-ud-Deen Muradabadi (talk)	Cleanup
47	Foreign relations of Libya (talk)	Cleanup
4,477	Digimon (talk)	Expand
35	Idris bin Abdullah al-Senussi (talk)	Expand
34	International recognition of the National Transitional Council (talk)	Expand
1,032	Ejection fraction (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
56	ByeAlex (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
46	Human rights in Libya (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
591	Shogi (talk)	Merge
57	Toubou people (talk)	Merge
24	Domestic responses to the Libyan civil war (talk)	Merge
2,393	Tofu (talk)	Wikify
10	Second Battle of Zawiya (talk)	Wikify
213	Group purchasing organization (talk)	Wikify
5	Crap Mats (talk)	Orphan
2	Cities and towns during the Libyan civil war (talk)	Orphan
3	Al-Nidaa Brigade (talk)	Orphan
2	Fashloom (talk)	Stub
4	Szczytt (talk)	Stub
7	Waddan, Libya (talk)	Stub
5	Dehiba (talk)	Stub
5	Huari, Peru (talk)	Stub
8	Giuliana Bridge (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Prod vs AfD

Thanks for spotting my error - I must have picked up the wrong template. I did want them as AfD's but will leave it as a prod for now. NealeFamily (talk) 23:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. NealeFamily (talk) 00:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwest Airlines Flight 345.

Bearian (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Ansh6 6 6 21:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Make one whole and Multifarious

You might be right in that these pages probably can't be expanded further; however, so as to retain the content, what would you suggest?

Is there a list-type page? --Qwerty Binary (talk) 03:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Closest I could find was wikt:Appendix:Legal_terms. I'd say these belong more on Wiktionary than Wikipedia. You can create these (or in the case of multifarious, add) there, and then add a WP:Soft redirect (if you do, don't forget to dePROD them). Ansh6 6 6 03:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Done, I think. Thanks for your help! --Qwerty Binary (talk) 08:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Fixed it a bit for you. Of note, your wikt:make one whole page was just deleted as being a copyvio. Ansh6 6 6 18:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh, that's unfortunate. Thank you for your help throughout this all. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 01:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

What exactly is copyright violation on Wiktionary and how does it apply to terms of art? --Qwerty Binary (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

It's a WP:Copyright violation (same here as there) - in short, you probably copy-pasted the text from a source. Even with the source cited, that's not okay. Ansh6 6 6 06:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I rewrote it as far as it's permissible while retaining the original meaning but not the original phrasing.

In any case, that's all very good and well to say but there are terms with fixed meanings or where there is little latitude for people to change without distorting meaning; a word with no other way to be expressed, such as thousands of terms coined in the sciences, cannot be protected by copyright. One example of this is RNA, ribonucleic acid. Facts, likewise, may not be copyright. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 11:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

By the way, I know you're not an administrator or the person who deleted the entry, but I thought your replies have been nothing short of intelligent and insightful as well as informed of site policies. :) Thanks for your replies thus far. --Qwerty Binary (talk)

I know what you mean. On Wikipedia that text would have been fine, but maybe Wiktionary has more stringent policies; I don't know, as I've never really been on there before. Thanks for your compliments, I try my best but few ever notice

Ansh6 6 6 18:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Roller gun listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roller gun. Since you had some involvement with the Roller gun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BDD (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

RE: AFDs

Ok, i will do that from now on. Koala15 (talk) 00:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Stuff...

I certainly am. The article itself needs work and at the moment it has obvious WP:NOTNEWS issues. As for notability, the question, I think, is whether or not it has a longer-term WP:EFFECT. If you consider the ASADA investigation to have resulted from the admission, then I think the effect is obvious. If you consider the admission and ASADA investigation to be the one event (not an immediately obvious conclusion given the broader scope of ASADA's current work) then EFFECT probably isn't there yet. But if you do consider them to be one in the same, are the departures of Evans and Robinson enough to meet WP:EFFECT? I certainly think the article needs to be more than just a "timeline of events" but I think the subject itself is probably notable. A good candidate for a proper clean-up I think. Stalwart111 09:21, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, it needs that. These guys might be able to help. Stalwart111 23:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Timeline on Cape Canaveral

What made you speedy keep the nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Cape Canaveral? There was no reason given. Student7 (talk) 14:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

If you want to merge, do it yourself or start a merge discussion on the talk page. AfD is not for merging discussions. The linked page (WP:Speedy Keep#1) is the relevant guideline. Thanks, Ansh6 6 6 16:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

List of Russian inventions

You have given me advice in the past...I need your help with the List of Russian inventions. I have added a speedy deletion tag to said page. Unfortunately, I appear to have made a mistake (error code) and I have no idea how to fix it. I would appreciate it if you could review it and tell me what you think.

P.S. The page has received less than one click a day for the last 90 days. So, it may not be worth the effort. --RAF910 (talk) 23:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

I did not expect you to respond so quickly and to fix it for me...Thank You --RAF910 (talk) 23:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
79	Lee (film) (talk)	Add sources
17	Nur für Deutsche (talk)	Add sources
4	Gleeson College (talk)	Add sources
137	Safia Farkash (talk)	Add sources
16	Cabidela (talk)	Add sources
689	Tripoli (talk)	Add sources
8	Gottfried Müller (talk)	Cleanup
4	Allford Hall Monaghan Morris (talk)	Cleanup
3,569	Iraq War (talk)	Cleanup
1,945	2012–13 Egyptian protests (talk)	Expand
40	Anti-Gaddafi forces (talk)	Expand
11	National Conference for the Libyan Opposition (talk)	Expand
66	Pedophile press (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55	Military mascot (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,126	Caucasian Shepherd Dog (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
48	Internet in Brazil (talk)	Merge
35	Libyan people (talk)	Merge
21,218	Pacific Rim (film) (talk)	Merge
479	Timeline of the Syrian civil war (September–December 2012) (talk)	Wikify
88	Tune Hotels (talk)	Wikify
55	Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (talk)	Wikify
9	Andrew Reynolds (political scientist) (talk)	Orphan
5	Libyan–Sudanese conflict (talk)	Orphan
3	Caricature during the Libyan civil war (talk)	Orphan
2	Zawiyat al-Dahmani (talk)	Stub
7	Blackfriars Priory School (talk)	Stub
6	Brigade 93 (talk)	Stub
9	Dave McKenzie (artist) (talk)	Stub
90	Muhammad Gaddafi (talk)	Stub
12	Suleiman Mahmoud (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ansh666. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Message added 05:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

How do I go about merging two articles?

You have been very helpful in the past...

As of August 2013, Izhmash and Izhevsk Mechanical Plant have been merged together and formally renamed Kalashnikov Concern [[2]]. I have already renamed the Izhmash article to Kalashnikov Concern, but I don't know how to go about merging the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant into it. The, Progress R&D Technical Institute, Vyatsko-Polyansky Machine Works and L.N. are not on Wiki so they are of no concern.

Thank You--RAF910 (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

This isn't really my area of expertise here - I deal mostly with inclusion/deletion policy, not content work. Personally, I think that Izhevsk Mechanical Plant can stay (as notability isn't temporary), but needs a new section dealing with the company merger and saying that it's no longer active on its own; while the Kalashnikov Concern page already mentions it, the section at the bottom could expand a bit on the recent news (since it's still talking about the merger proposal). I'm not sure how active WikiProject Russia is, but you might want to ask on their talkpage or one of the editors here (minus the last guy, he's community banned). Hope this helps, Ansh6 6 6 22:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

O.K. sounds good. I will add the merge info to the bottom of the page...Thanks again--RAF910 (talk) 22:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Few

I take it you don't consider four to be "few"? —Psychonaut (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Not intending to pile on, but I am in a agreement with Psychonaut...few is few, and SPA tag criteria are met. While I can understand your reasons for this edit, there is always a worry when an account with 4-lifetime-edits (now 5) states "I think there is enough coverage out there for this article to be rewritten. I'd even be willing to take a stab at it."[3] Even if not a SPA, the account feels like one... as it is rare that brand new accounts with almost no edit history find their way to AFD and offer to rewrite articles. Though appreciating his sentiment, I was going to so tag him myself until I saw you un-tagged him. And the fact that a brand new account properly formatted a citation almost makes one think, that even if not a very lucky SPA, this may be a puppet. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

The problem is, you can't tag an account that clearly isn't a SPA with the SPA tag! They may have very few edits, but the majority are outside of this subject area. They could be a puppet, of course, or a clean start or a longtime IP editor who finally decided to make an account (like User:Someone not using his real name, sorry about the ping) or even just a really lucky newbie. I might tend to WP:AGF to the extreme, but clearly this isn't a case of WP:SPA (at least not in the subject area you claim it is). Don't bite the newbies, anyone? Ansh6 6 6 17:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
27	Warpath (video game) (talk)	Add sources
1,039	Benghazi (talk)	Add sources
11	Pump It Up NX2 (talk)	Add sources
1,674	Bit (talk)	Add sources
16	Royal Brunei Police Force (talk)	Add sources
86	Spend management (talk)	Add sources
3,820	Libya (talk)	Cleanup
139	Julius Lothar Meyer (talk)	Cleanup
46	Aspyr (talk)	Cleanup
878	BioShock 2 (talk)	Expand
11	Florida Holocaust Museum (talk)	Expand
7,212	The Last of Us (talk)	Expand
8	Sarah Bonnell School (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4	Riga Merchant Guild (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
29	Foreign relations of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
343	Anti-Zionism (talk)	Merge
1,392	The Dukes of Hazzard (talk)	Merge
151	Italian Libya (talk)	Merge
1,029	Homefront (video game) (talk)	Wikify
1,978	Metro: Last Light (talk)	Wikify
59	District cooling (talk)	Wikify
3	Nabhi Raja (talk)	Orphan
3	Forward Commitment Procurement (talk)	Orphan
6	Sugrivajne (Sugriva pledge) (talk)	Orphan
22	Landy Wen (talk)	Stub
2	Tarabulus Zoo Park (talk)	Stub
8	Lada Revolution (talk)	Stub
6	Ito Ang Balita (talk)	Stub
29	Skoda M1909 machine gun (talk)	Stub
8	Casting the Stones (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)