User talk:AntanO/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello AntanO:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Request on 05:27:42, 9 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Rybkovich


re One World Commune: what's the copyrighted content? What I quoted? Do you have a rule on how many words I can quote?

Rybkovich (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I took out the paragraphed quotes. Rybkovich (talk) 05:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Why a copyright violation?

You stated that you declined Draft:Christ Communion on the basis that it is a copyright violation. However, you did not state what part(s) were such. I'm really not sure why you made your decision. Can you please provide more information/clarification? I don't know how to fix something if I don't know what is wrong with it.

Thanks

Justsurfin12 (talk) 05:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Justsurfin12

76% contents are from here. Read WP:COPYVIO and WP:C-P @Justsurfin12 and Rybkovich: --AntanO 04:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

How are my lists of launches copyright violations?

You just declined List of Virgin Galactic launches, List of Delta 4 launches, and List of Atlas LV3B launches all as copyright violations. How are they one? The link you said it was copied from List of Atlas LV3B launches in was were Atlas LV-3B copied it from. This page then copied (with attribution on the talk page) Atlas LV-3B. List of Virgin Galactic launches has a comment specificly saying it not a copyright violation. List of Delta 4 launches had copied from (with attribution on the talk page) from Delta IV. It seems like Delta IV did copy and paste from there since the orginal copied content (before I added more sources), only had 1 reference. @AntanO:

Discuss at help desk. --AntanO 14:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

{{You've got mail}}

Corrections made for Tsagaan Puntsag bio

Greetings Sir,

I made some revisions such as minor text and added citations and references per your advice yesterday.

Please review my article.

Thank you much,

Bodibilguun Galsan Bodibilguun (talk) 04:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia page creation issue

Hello sir , i have created a page called Jarjangi. But unfortunately this page was named as jarjangi 2. How to edit this page. Please help me. Vetri Murugan (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Request to delete Draft:Jarjangi (WP:DEL) and them move Draft:Jarjangi 2 to Draft:Jarjangi (WP:MOVE). --AntanO 16:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

White Muslims page

i have added a few sources which use the term white Muslims, showing it's common usage in official surveys, journals and articles.

Request on 07:31:43, 24 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Janetmatina


I don't understand why this page was rejected

Janetmatina (talk) 07:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Reason is at your talk page as note. --AntanO 07:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:1947 Sirhind Massacre

I again tried my best to make the article mentioned according to wikipedia demand in light of your worthy guidance. Kindly accept it or guide me again in this regard. NKFJKFIFFF (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:1947 Sirhind Train Massacre NKFJKFIFFF (talk) 14:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@NKFJKFIFFF: I am unable to verify the article with sources. Are you referring 1947 Amritsar train massacre? Is it same? --AntanO 14:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Sir it is a separate incident. Its major sources are in urdu newspapers which are cited in references. I think Sir may be You are not able to understand urdu language but it is my request to read its references via Google Translator. You will come to know that references are according to Wikipedia Policy. As I am new on Wikipedia so I tried to copy the only style of existing relevant articles to make my article more acceptable for Wikipedia. Otherwise references and incidents of this article are independently unique and pure and dost not relate to 1947 Amritsar Train Massacre. I will be in wait of your guidance because I want to learn something on Wikipedia as this article is not final or last for me. It is beginning for me to spent time of life in useful way. NKFJKFIFFF (talk) 16:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

@NKFJKFIFFF: When it comes to reference, we need reliable sources (see WP:RS). There are websites, books. etc. We have to give RS. If you can find some reliable sources, there is no issues to work on the article "1947 Sirhind Massacre" since it is notable. --AntanO 03:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Sir for your kind guidance. My article is rejected thrice so there is no option of resubmitt. Kindly guide me that how can I resubmitt article after improving it. NKFJKFIFFF (talk) 12:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

My Page Was Declined

Can you please tell my why you declined my page. I want to know the main issue of my page. So please help me. I verify 16+ verified sources. But my page declined. Why?

Draft failed to meet WP:BIO. When you discuss, do not forget to WP:SIG. --AntanO 03:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Saïd Djabelkhir was declined

Hello, thank you for having reviewed my draft. Unfortunately, you have declined it. Could you tell me more about the reasons ? - is it lacking of english-language sources ? - is it lacking of secondary sources ? Or something else ? Thank you. --Record (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

The draft is not much cover WP:BIO guideline. --AntanO 03:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I agree that the author is not very covered. But he is not an english-speaker, his books are only in arabic language, which can explain his lack of notoriety. On the other hand, his affair has been much covered in algerian and french medias. I've added some sources. Could you please review it again ? --Record (talk) 14:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Declination of Article Mithila University

The existence of the university of Mithila is discussed in many research papers. Please go through the references. I have provided reference which is government document from British India to modern government. If you feel that standard of the paragraphs are lower than please help to improve its standard and please help in publishing the article.

https://state.bihar.gov.in/lrc/Content.html?links&page=Darbhanga Sntshkumar750 (talk) 08:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi AntanO Thanks for helping point out some needed improvements on the first round of this page. I have submitted the edit with more sources plus also, two quick comments to help:

PAGE NAME See this was wrong originally wrong, sorry my mistake. Please could you help to change the page name so it is disambiguated, thank you (or tell me what I can do on my side); DELETE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Miller_OBE_SBS_JP INSERT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Miller_(Hong_Kong_government_official) Tony Miller (Hong Kong government official)

And then that this page has a link on this disambiguation page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Miller


Also, I have connected in with the these key categories so the bio and the importance of the individual is clearer: Category:Government officials of Hong Kong Category: Hong Kong civil servants Category:Recipients of the Silver Bauhinia Star Category:Officers of the Order of the British Empire

The last two are linked to the official government gazette announcements in Hong Kong and London.

Thank you for your help

Campbell

Page on Tony Miller (Hong Kong government official)

Hi AntanO Thanks for helping point out some needed improvements on the first round of this page. I have submitted the edit with more sources plus also, two quick comments to help:

PAGE NAME See this was wrong originally wrong, sorry my mistake. Please could you help to change the page name so it is disambiguated, thank you (or tell me what I can do on my side); DELETE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Miller_OBE_SBS_JP INSERT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Miller_(Hong_Kong_government_official) Tony Miller (Hong Kong government official)

And then that this page has a link on this disambiguation page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Miller


Also, I have connected in with the these key categories so the bio and the importance of the individual is clearer: Category:Government officials of Hong Kong Category: Hong Kong civil servants Category:Recipients of the Silver Bauhinia Star Category:Officers of the Order of the British Empire

The last two are linked to the official government gazette announcements in Hong Kong and London.

Thank you for your help

Campbell

A pie for you!

Thank you for your efforts keeping the AfC backlog drive leaderboard updated! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


Antoons Draft

Hi, I'll try and respond here, and see if you will talk. I tried to talk to you on Facebook, but you appear to prefer to talk here.

About this article draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Antoons

I have a few questions:

1: You mentioned one of the issues with the article was "Irrelevant topics." Could you specifically state what topics you thought were irrelevant?

2: There is this video he did with Dragoncon, a convention big enough that it has it's own Wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_Con The video in question is right here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZceLRIZEm4Y Is that considered a reliable source, due to being from such a high profile convention?

Hope to hear from you soon. Defender miz (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

First of all, I repeat the comment It has several issues. It refs are rely on a few sources even without WP:RS. YouTube and FB are not good sources. Article tells more about early life and irrelevant topic which seems WP:SOAP, and mainly failed to meet WP:BIO guideline. If draft is not per WP:NOT, we consider "Irrelevant topics". --AntanO 23:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
I reworked the article and resubmitted it. I just have a question. I was looking at another article to help inspire me, and I notice that a good chunk of it's sources are basically YouTube videos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Everman How come it was okay for that article to use YouTube videos for references? Defender miz (talk) 00:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject SpaceX

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are, can you please make a WikiProject proposal for it (I as an IP, can not make the proposal cause I would be stopped when trying to create the proposal page). @AntanO:

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, Botswana The Rambling Man and New York (state) Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Republic of Venice Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, England Lee Vilenski, Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose, Rwanda Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. George Floyd mural Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations from WikiProject Articles for Creation!

The Articles for Creation Barnstar
Congratulations! You have earned The Articles for Creation Barnstar for reviewing an outstanding 214 drafts during the WikiProject Articles for creation July 2021 Backlog Drive. Thank you for your work to improve Wikipedia!
On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey (talk!) 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello AntanO,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution

Pls engage in the dispute resolution process. Thank you - UmdP 05:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

  1. Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
  3. Rwanda Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
  4. New York (state) Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
  5. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
  6. Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
  7. Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
  8. Republic of Venice Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding dispute discussion you have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Eelam".The discussion is about the topic Eelam. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! JohnWiki159 (talk) 08:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Review a draft

Can you review draft runixx info tech Tysanandreq1 (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas AntanO

Hi AntanO, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and healthy New Year,
Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,
   –Davey2010Talk 17:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, AntanO!

Happy New Year!

AntanO,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 00:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Request help to undo a move

Greetings. I would like to request your help to undo a move for Mother Sayamagyi. The talk page on this move topic has no further response for more than 2 months and I would appreciate your assistance to rename the article to Mother Sayamagyi which fulfills all the 5 characteristics as per Wikipedia:Naming_conventions. Thank you. Anicca837 (talk) 13:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

The indexes of Sri Lanka–related articles are up for deletion

Hi, I've nominated for deletion Index of Sri Lanka–related articles (0–9) and the rest of the pages in this set. You're welcome to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Sri Lanka–related articles. – Uanfala (talk) 20:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TopicTOC-Country-Sri Lanka

Template:TopicTOC-Country-Sri Lanka has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
  • Christmas Island AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
  • Philadelphia GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
  • SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
  • United Nations Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Flag of Pandya

Its better to Use English on this page since many people reading it are not native Tamil speakers. also as per WP:INDICSCRIPTS we should avoid the use of Indic scripts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.171.220.61 (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Read under "Linking to other Indian Language Wikipedias"--AntanO 18:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

It still says to avoid Indic scripts 122.171.220.61 (talk) 07:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

There are conditions, and discuss at talk page if you are disagree than vandalize edits. --AntanO 12:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
It's not really vandalization. It's a content dispute. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Plz look at earlier edits. --AntanO 13:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Flag of Pandya

How 'bout the original with translation in parenthesis? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Would you tell specifically? --AntanO 13:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  1. New York (state) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
  2. Christmas Island AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
  3. Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
  4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
  5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
  6. United States Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
  7. England Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello AntanO,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 817 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello AntanO,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15339 articles, as of 20:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
  • Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello AntanO,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi AntanO,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:St. Michael's College, Batticaloa, Sri Lanka.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St. Michael's College, Batticaloa, Sri Lanka.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Shaivism as the religion of Chola emperors

Hey, I hope you are having a great day.
I can see that recently you have made some edits on the pages of several Chola Emperors removing the information that they were followers of Hinduism adding that they were followers of Shaivism.
It is clearly established by WP:RS that Shaivism is a sect/tradition and a subset of Hinduism. A detailed discussion about this has just taken place at Chola Dynasty talk page. >>> Extorc.talk 15:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Why don't you discuss before make changes? I already I made my points there and then made changes. AntanO 17:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
He discussed it for more than 1 week. Don't falsely accuse others of not discussing their edits. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 04:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Did he or anyone discuss with me?--AntanO 14:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello AntanO,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AntanO/Archive_6&oldid=1122922175"