User talk:Antonio Lopez/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipe-tan

How did you get that image to float like that??? I tried it on my page, but it won't float. It stays at the bottom. I'm watchin' you,mon (talk) 01:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

just copy this code to your userpage

<!-- span style="position:absolute;top:-75px;left:-185px;z-index:-1" --> <div style="position: fixed; right:12px; bottom:0; display:block; height:{{{1|150}}}px; width:{{{1|150}}}px;"><div style="position: relative; width: {{{1|150}}}px; height: {{{1|150}}}px;">[[Image:All_your_base_are_belong_to_Wikipe-tan.gif‎|165px]]</div></div>

note: this does not work in Internet explorer yet --Antonio Lopez (talk)01:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

what's this... --Antonio Lopez (talk)03:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
well I added the the {{NoAutosign}} templete, because I have another way of signing --Antonio Lopez (talk)15:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

No te olvides de tus raices.

No te olvides de las raices que tienes hermano. Proteges a un pais mediocre, con leyes mediocres para gente mediocre.

Lamento el hecho de que seas uno mas que edita sin antes leer. Esto no es vandalismo, es justicia. Aprende a leer antes de editar, aprende a pensar antes de amanecer cada manana.


Fight for not falling into his past (recession), we fought for the dignity that you lost long ago in Vietnam. Come back field. No to NAFTA

Viva MEXICO! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.92.118.151 (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Mucha gracias por tus palabras, pero el NAFTA nos dio más trabajos en mexico; y muy buenas noticias que te tengo; El NAFTA se va acabar en el 2009 --Antonio Lopez (talk)00:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I couldn't really figure out what he was trying to say. Corvus cornixtalk 00:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I understood that part about your roots, but I didn't understand who "he" is and what he meant about recession. Corvus cornixtalk 00:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

What vandalism? re: Ingleburn_High_School

Thankyou for your message. I fail to see how facts which are not defamatory, that have citations are vandalism. Meanwhile the users Weatherstone and IngleburnProtector may make advertisements by using marketing, non NPOV statements and other unsubstatiated statements. Please reply with an explanation of why you have "warned" me and what part of my edit constitutes vandalism?

OzWoden (talk) 02:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)



Thankyou for your reply. First, what is the stub template? If i know what it is I will know not to remove it. Secondly the school graffiti is not vandalism. I did not do the graffiti. The graffiti is an artwork that the school got some of the art classes to do a few years ago. Also what about the marketing style comments of the other users such as about excess demand to go to the school and "a truly comprehensive school"? surely those statements are vandalism.OzWoden (talk) 02:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

And since i dont know what this stub template is, then according tohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism :

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism.

my accidental removal of the stub template (which i did not realise i had done, nor realised what a stub template is) means i have not vandalised. OzWoden (talk) 02:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

yes please move them if you like.OzWoden (talk) 02:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


I take it I can add back my edits apart from making sure I don’t get rid of the stub and not including the graffiti info?OzWoden (talk) 03:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

I rolled back some vandalism here, you can update your counter. KC109 (talk) 03:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

thanks--Antonio Lopez (talk) 03:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: User talk:89.244.191.138

Many thanks for reporting it, it was indeed a mistake on my part. I've unblocked. Happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 01:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

!תודה

Thanks for the revert on my userspace! :) Good catch there. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 04:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Any time! Antonio Lopez (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Nontrinitarianism

I see that you are active on the Jehovah's Witnesses discussion page,
and so I thought I would invite you to contribute to the improvemet, addition of references,
and general clean up of the Nontrinitarianism Article so that it does not get neglected!
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Actualy I am just archiving the talkpage to speed up the page load time and to avoid server lag, but I will be most happy to help in adding references and wikifying.--Antonio Lopez (talk) 03:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

I am not vandalising the Cranston West page. I am putting in information. Please tell me why you are deleting it and telling me it is vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.30.217 (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Mostaccioli

I don't understand why you un-edited the Mostaccioli page. Mostaccioli was being redirected to Penne. However, Pene and Mostaccioli are no the same pasta. Penne has ridges and Mostaccioli does not. Therefore the redirection is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.182.123.125 (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I would like to apologize

I was just bored. Hopefully you will forgive me.

One last thing:Ths is relevant to my interests D_D

Please accept ym apology thank you

-Link —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.213.36 (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your not Link, I'm Link; just kidding, sure whatever just don't do it again. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 04:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


hey, That hurt my feelings —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.213.36 (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I said I was kidding. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 05:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks

request

65.125.73.103 is an IP at a school. I am in now way affiliated with the accounts used here, if you notice, I warned this IP a couple of times. I would still like to edit from this location if possible. If it's not possible, I would just edit from home. Thanks--Antonio Lopez (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the problems. I wish I could say this wouldn't affect you in the future but that's not the case. While students at your school continue to vandalise the Wikipedia, this IP address will likely continue to be blocked automatically.  :( --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 65.125.73.103 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Yamla (talk) 16:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm aware of that.--Antonio Lopez (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

what constitutes vandalism? I'm just bored, but i didn't even curse. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.138.116 (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleting pages

I edited the page per the regulations but you keep marking it as spam.

There are other similar companies like Bvlgari listed in the wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Verragio (talk • contribs) 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Verragio

Aren't we all lazy today, reverting entire edits just to restore a template :p I also re-added the csd tag, but I was too lazy to do it manually so I used twinkle instead. Now it looks like I added a csd to a page that already has a hangon tag on it lol. Oh well. — NovaDog — (contribs) 23:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I was going to fix that, but you beat me to it.--Antonio Lopez (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Plus I was not the only one, and the edits I reverted, in fact, did looked like spam. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

St. Lucie West Centennial High School

Everything I just added about Centennial was true they have a golf team, look up chasmin davis he is the only good football player to come from there. look up there deans list. stop deleting my shit just because you don;t research it. and there are a lot of negroes there —Preceding unsigned comment added by Operationquietnoise (talk • contribs)


I did not remove your content except one sentence. Please read WP:CIVIL. Research, me research, you should be adding sources and there should not be any original research --Antonio Lopez (talk) 05:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Lucie West Centennial High School

Would you please kindly re-review the article and if you determine that your delete !vote is no longer warranted, modify it as appropriate? Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 16:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Shoot, I was to late to change my choice... --Antonio Lopez (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Syesha Mercado's page

Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article that fails to assert that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia.

Under the notability guidelines for music she meets number 9. She is on American Idol, was on ABC's The One, and won Florida's Super Singer.

Please don't delete her page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SRQtoBOS (talk • contribs) 00:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I did not delete her page, I just reverted your edit. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


Yea and by reverting my edit you deleted her page........ Under the music notability page syesha meets requirement number 9...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by SRQtoBOS (talk • contribs) 03:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not the same, because it can still be recovered, plus only an administrator can delete articles. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for handling the vandals on my talk page! So here's my thanks! a barnstar! Party!Talk to me! 19:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Anytime--Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Party's appreciation is seconded. Cheers, JNW (talk) 19:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

this guy is a dick

he is a dick i jus wanted 2 express my opinions—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom jacksonic (talk • contribs)

Yeah right... --Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, that is called a POV, if it was, seen here [1] --Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Coheed

Why don't you read into the debate on the page instead of siding automatically with POV-pushing coheed fan editors? There is a debate that sides, critically and journalistically, against the revisions being forced onto the article by the fan-editors. I committed no vandalism. Your editors are committing fan vandalism, why don't you warn them? Check the citations. A half dozen for emo, two for prog, and the prog citations come from the label and the band. That's not neutral sourcing.

Study your shit before you warn me, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.34.217.190 (talk • contribs)

Eww Gross, but it smells bad; no seriously read WP:CIVIL before you leave a message. Well that the first time I am called a POV pusher, I had no idea. The reason I reverted you was because you removed a comment that stated "<!-- Please do not change their genre; see the section on their genre below -->" and then leaving a poor edit summary shown here [2] which could be easily be confused for vandalism.Antonio Lopez (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Wait hold on what do you mean POV pushing? Antonio Lopez (talk) 00:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I prefer to show a neutral point of view, thank you very muchAntonio Lopez (talk) 00:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

re saul tillich

fyi, his edits do not constitute vandalism per WP's definitions. it's a content dispute. unfortunately, i don't know what the next step is in order to get this guy to stop. Anastrophe (talk) 23:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually it was vandalism. [3] No edit summary to why he removed it. The way to stop him is until he violates the Three-revert rule or similar, then he gets reported.Antonio Lopez (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
ah, indeed, i missed that one. content blanking. certainly can be characterized as vandalism. thanks. Anastrophe (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure, sorry for the wait.Antonio Lopez (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Polymer Clay

Hi Antonio, thanks very much for cleaning up my talk page. Since the person knows that they can't write personal attacks my talk page (because you undid the changes), now they are filling up the Polymer Clay discussion page with these same personal attacks. Specifically they are calling me a vandal when in fact I was just trying to add a useful link to a Polymer Clay discussion forum. I have given up on inserting this link, and that is not a big deal, but the user persists in filling up the Polymer Clay discussion page with this unjustified accusation. For example there is a section that was named "Vandalism by TFpbear" which is trying to give me a bad name in the Wikipedia community. I checked the Wikipedia policies and what I have done is nothing more than a content dispute. The link that I tried to add has less commercial affiliation than other external links, it is merely a useful resource for Polymer Clay artists (the site does not sell any Polymer Clay products or contain advertising, unlike the other links). What I would like to do is to undo all of the "vandal" accusations on the Polymer Clay discussion page - replace them with the term "content dispute" or just remove these sections entirely, and warn the editor(s) please do not do this kind of thing to well intentioned contributors. I am not interested in changing any of the article content, but I would just like to clean up the name-calling on the discussion area and warn the user about the improper use of the term "vandalism." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fpbear (talk • contribs) 21:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello Antonio. I reject these accusations.
  • The site Fpbear has repeatedly inserted is for a commercial organisation.
  • Also Fpbear has a personal involvment with this site - this is conflict of interest.
  • Other authors have previously disagreed with the link, and removed it.
  • Fpbear has inserted links to the same commercial site into other articles, including statue. The organisation does sell statues.
  • I returned links that Fpbear removed. I have no affiliations with these sites. I am not "protecting" them. I returned these as they had existed for a long time, with consensus of authors. I returned them after Fpbear removed them, in what seemed a fit of pique, when their link was challenged.
  • Content has been repeatidy removed from the discussion page of polymer clay. On a number of occassion I have politely asked for this not to happen. It noted this was aganst policy, and could be interpreted as efforts to confuse, distort and censor.
  • Vandalism or not the insertion of CoI links to commercial organisation is not "well intentioned" or "good faith edits."
  • I have made no personal attacks. It can be seen I have been polite. There can be no reason to "warn" me, apart from the earlier advice regarding 3RR that applied to both myself and Fpbear.
  • There have been allegations made against me. There have also been other allegations but I will not repeat.
  • I contend vandalism includes (1) link spam, (2) the removal of consensus agreed content from an article, without prior discussion, as some form of revenge, (3) changing the content of a discussion page and deletion of content from it just because the person disagrees.
  • I have asked more than once for Fpbear to comment on content and not the contributor. This has been ignored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.105.0 (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

OK let me check the article history to see whats the dipute. Antonio Lopez (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I responded on the article talk page.--Antonio Lopez (talk) 23:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Macquarie University

Hello Antionio, I am not vandalising the Macquarie University wiki site, I work for the University and have been working with other staff members on correcting problems and making sure the information is all up-to-date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Janinevdt (talk • contribs) 03:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that I responded on your talkAntonio Lopez (talk) 03:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Antonio_Lopez/Archive2&oldid=1074991031"