User talk:AnulBanul/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Anulmanul! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

An invitation

Thanks for the invitation. I am unable to participate because I am topic banned from all "post-1900 Serbia and Serbs" related articles. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Not a problem. I hope you will join when your ban expires. Best whishes. :) --Anulmanul (talk) 21:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AnulBanul. You have new messages at Vanjagenije's talk page.
Message added 22:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Republika Srpska

Hi

The talkpage template for WikiProject Republika Srpska was in some aspects broken, so I used the Bosnia and Herzegovina project template and adapted it for the Republika Srpska project. Is there any reason why you want to keep the old one? - Anonimski (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

The one I copied over uses {{{class|}}} which can handle classes, and hide them when necessary (such as template pages). And the articlespace prefixes (Template:, etc.) aren't supposed to show up like they do on the old version. - Anonimski (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Award

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your fine edits all-around, and specially for the creation of the WikiProject Republika Srpska, the least I can do is award you this barnstar. Keep up the excellent work, kindest regards, FkpCascais (talk) 01:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serzh Sargsyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Armenia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Բարև հարգելի Աննա ջան: Եթե ինչ որ բանի օգնության կարիք լինի, իմաց տվեք՝ կփորձեմ օգնել ձեզ որպես նոր օգտատերի: --Երևանցի ^talk 01:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Շնորհակալություն Երեվանցի ջան: Ես կոչ եմ ձեզ, եթե անհրաժեշտ է: --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Portal: Republika Srpska

Поздрав. Свака част за прављење портала Република Српска! Само желим да ти кажем да сам ја направио такав на српском и да сам га данас повезао линком са овим на енглеском, па ако ти буде био од користи, слободно се послужи ;) Угањао сам и овдје заставицу да нам ставе на банер за портал. Мени енглески језик баш и није јача страна, али сам вољан да помогнем ако шта буде требало.--Слободни умјетник (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Јоооој, да умрем од срамоте! Ја енглески да бекнем, ни реч. Ово што сам уређивао, то су ми превели странице које сам урадио и средио на српској Википедији. Иначе сам активан на српској Википедији, по оној нашој старој причај српски, да те читав свет разуме. Ако ти зашта требам, овакав какав сам, јави се молим те и не замери. (darkocgajic@gmail.com)--Gajdario (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Bilateral

Sorry, I don't know how to make a map. I've worked on many bilateral articles but haven't seen any make good article status. LibStar (talk) 06:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenia–Serbia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrovac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Serbia Barnstar of National Merit
		I've noticed your recent edits on Armenia–Serbia relations and have appreciated them greatly. Thank you for your contributions to an article within the scope of WikiProject Serbia! 23 editor (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Anulmanul

Hi! I see that you sign your posts as "Anulmanul" (like here) with a link to User:Anulmanul, which in turn, redirects to your user page. I just want to tell you that it is not a very good practice. Other people are not aware that your username is actually not Anulmanul, so they may want to wp:ping you using {{ping|Anulmanul}} or similar, but that would not work because there is no user named "Anulmanul". I advice you to change your WP:signature so to display "Anulmanul", but to link to your user page (like [[User:Yerevani Axjik|Anulmanul]] or something similar). That way, everybody will see that your username is Yerevani Axjik, while your signature is Anulmanul. All the best! Vanjagenije (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Salman

Hi, since there is an enormous amount of work to be done, and I am going on a wiki break, I would prefer you to fail it for the time being. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok. I'll do so. Thank you for your reply. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Destroyer Of Nyr (talk • contribs) 22:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Article. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.
Bosnian independence referendum, 1992 and Party of Democratic Action appear to be consistently vandalized by you. I hope you come to mind and start editing Wikipedia in a civil way. And learn to use real sources. The Destroyer Of Nyr (talk) 22:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Armenia–Croatia relations at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

No worries, just did this for you...[1] GregorB (talk) 10:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your first DYK

It appears that this is your first DYK. I can try to help you. The article you expanded, Armenia–Croatia relations, needs to be included in the DYK sentence. It should be the most important aspect of the sentence. The current DYK sentence (...that a Croat Jesuit Juraj Marinović wrote the first modern history of Armenians in the West?) doesn't show anything about Croatian-Armenian relations. So I think we can make different DYK sentence. For example, Armenia's diplomatic relations with Croatia is represented in Rome, Italy? Also, which one is the Lepis 2008 source? I can't find it. Is it a book? Եթէ ուզում ես հայերէն կառամ խօսամ: Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry we can help you. You did a good job with the article. I made some fixes again. Someone else should review it soon. Hopefully, it will be on the main page of Wikipedia. I think I have done over 100+ DYK nominations in Armenian related articles so I know I can be very helpful (at least I hope :D). Այո, Հայ եմ: Բայց արեւմտեայ հայ եմ :) Դուք նոր էք երեւում: Եթէ որեւէ օգնութիւն պէտք ունիք ինծ կարագ ասել: Իսկ էլ-փոստի հասցէ չունէ՞ք: Եթէ ուզում ես այդպէս աւելի դիւրաւ կառանք խօսալ: Քո էլ-փոստի հասցէն պարամետրների մէջ աւելցնելով որէւէ անց քեզ կարա անձնական հաղորդագրութիւն անել: Ես այսպէս կը նախընտրեմ որովհետեւ քո անձնական կյանքը բացէ ի բաց խօսիլը մի քիչ անհանգստություն կրնայ լինի: Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

When IPs vandalise articles

Sorry coming to you so late, and I just noticed you solved the problem you had with IP in that article. It was clear that the IP was User:The Destroyer Of Nyr evading his block. Next time you face a similar situation, if the user is blocked already, you can report the IP to the blocking admin of the master account, as it is clear case of block evasion. FkpCascais (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

REVERTING YOUR NATIONALISM

You have violated the three-revert rule, so I will be reporting you.--Sabahudin9 (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Where? --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nino Raspudić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zrinjevac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Result of your edit warring complaint

Yerevani Axjik, you are warned per the result of the complaint of edit warring on Bosnian articles. See more details HERE (permanent link). I'm also alerting you (below) about the WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions, which apply to Bosnia. It's evident that you have more experience with Wikipedia than the other party but we need to show some patience, even with such things as incorrectly restoring a PROD. Though S. is quite stubborn he has also done some article creation. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

The Balkans are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Any further discussion of the AN3 complaint

If you have anything more to say about the dispute with User:Sabahudin9 that was reported at WP:AN3 please continue at User talk:EdJohnston#Bosnian dispute. EdJohnston (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kreševo

added links pointing to Lepenica, Stephen Thomas and Dusina

Fadil Hadžić

added a link pointing to Croatian

Mehmed-beg Kulenović

added a link pointing to Ostrovica

Veselin Gatalo

added a link pointing to NIN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Mayors

Hey since you are also very active in Bosnia-Herzegovina related articles, I was hoping you would help me out with a few articles. I just ran across the List of mayors of Sarajevo page and I've created two wikis for past mayors including Fehim Čurčić, who was mayor in 1914 at the time of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, and Esad Kulović, mayor during the Bosnian crisis. I'm hoping you can help flesh them out. --Sabahudin9 (talk) 07:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll see if I can do anything. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Emina

There is a discussion here that concerns you.--Sabahudin9 (talk) 06:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Emina (poem). Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer) (Not watching)

Amin İsgəndərli

This user is vandalizing Armenian wiki pages. I've already had to make a few changes to the Yerevan page. I don't know where to report him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoravaiDrina (talk • contribs) 15:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I know. This user vandalizes Bosnian wikis too. This user is out of control--Sabahudin9 (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Sabahudin, it's not about me, it's about Amin, the Azeri editor. :) --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 06:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Armenia–Croatia relations

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is WP:ARBMAC.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Read the exact wording of the template. It means that any editor who has been given the template is cautioned to read the listed policies and guidelines, and is cautioned that they may be subject to restrictions in their future editing if they edit disruptively. Read the exact wording of the template. It doesn't restrict you from anything. It cautions you. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bistročaj

added a link pointing to Trnovo

Boljanovići, Trnovo

added a link pointing to Trnovo

Donja Presjenica

added a link pointing to Trnovo

Godinja

added a link pointing to Trnovo

Govedovići, Trnovo

added a link pointing to Trnovo

Grab, Trnovo

added a link pointing to Trnovo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Think twice as they say..

You will be reported should you keep up your flagrant chauvinist pro-Serb POV pushing. I realize that you as a nationalist Armenian sympathise with your religious brethren in the form of Serbs through Orthodox ties and a common hate of Turks and Muslims. I get that, I understand it, I do, but keep it out of Wikipedia or I will act upon it untiringly to put an end to your breaches of every civilized standard of encyclopedic editing. A quick scan through your contribution history turns up heeps of evidence that will not be to your advantage; you might be looking at a topic ban, quite easily. Nearly every single edit related to Bosnia made by you is about undermining, questioning, or otherwise disqualifying Bosnia as a state/country and the Bosniaks as a people/ethnic group, whilst proving the Serbness of everything, and of course that the RS is nothing but a "true country". All of this is so self-evident to the degree that I would think twice before entering a process if I were you. As for the Cyrillic template replaced by you in every single geographical article related to the RS part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, please know that there is a consenus to use the template contested by you exactly for the reasons that the RS is a) not a "Serb country", but also shared by two other equally constitutive peoples and b) Cyrillic is also used as an official alphabet of the Bosnian language. You have been warned, my fair lady. The ball is in your court. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 14:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

There was a consenus, including several Serb editors, don't play daft, I beg you. And the consensus, or whatever it was, was certainly not to use the template enforced by you (a template which set off the discussion in the first place). It is the Serbian Cyrillic, but there is need to stress its "Serbianness" as explained, which you however opt to do for so very obvious reasons; to portray all those places as truly and only Serb with disregard for neutrality and the very constitution of that entity. I'm perfectly aware that you have a peculiar fascinating way of interpreting eveything according to your POV. How else would you find it acceptable to enforce even a tenth of your edits? I don't give a flying rat about "Demibajkajrw", you're dealing with me now, and I'm not amused. A small~, very small, sample of the evidence that will be used against you include pushing pro-Serb revisionist and apologist sources in relation to Srebrenica, removing the Bosnian name for Dubica, Bosnia and Herzegovina (a page which you also moved from "Dubica, Bosnia and Herzegovina" to "Dubica, Republika Srpska"), and for generally showing your unsuitability to edit Bosnia/Balkan-related articles by having vented your extremist and pro-Serb nationalist views on Bosnian and Bosniak history in relation to the failed arbitration in relation to "Emina". Sounds familiar? ;) Shall we tango? ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.239.102.226 (talk) 15:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

No of course you don't, almighty as you are. So full of confidence are we? The exchange between us stops here. Your POV is to thick to break through by simple measures. You will be notified of further actions in due time, stay tuned. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm Bond, and you're a nationalist Armenian in love with a genocidal Greater Serbia. I see a box office hit coming out of this. :D But I shall be the greater one of us, and offer you my condolences on the 100th anniversary of the horrible events. But I'm not sure hating on Bosniaks, an unrelated people and history you don't know the first thing about, is the best way to go about soothing your psychological trauma. May peace find you, poor soul. :) 46.239.102.226 (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Aha, so now you wanna talk? Just a moment ago it was more along the lines of "I don't give a damn..". Fine, let's talk. I'm all for a chat. So, will you reconsider running chauvinist errands for the cause of Greater Serbia or do we need to take it elsewhere? I'm amazed that no one has ever really challenged you yet, as far as I can tell. I'll be damned..46.239.102.226 (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

IP, what are you playing some sort of dangerous guy or something? Why don't you report or otherwise just shut-up and leave productive editors to work? Working on Republika Srpska articles is love with genocidal Greater Serbia only in your sick-twisted mind. FkpCascais (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Regarding the template, there was an agreement to drop "Serbian" from the Cyrillic while still having a link to the correct Serbian Cyrillic alphabet, but to add Cyrillic to ALL Bosnian-related articles. Bosniaks failed with this second part of the agreement, despite Cyrillic being official in the entire territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. FkpCascais (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Oh come on, Yerevani! Are you trying to say that I somehow rubbed you the wrong way? You're not exactly secretive about your 'affiliations' on your user page , shall we say. That taken together with the nature of your edits speaks volumes about your agenda. But like I said, that's fine, you can have your opinion no matter how one-sided, but don't expect it to dominate these quarters without serious challenge. So let's talk, instead of templates, I could imagine using "name sections" to adress the issue in greater detail that will satisfy the sensibilities of all constitutive peoples. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 16:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Fkp, why so aggressive? Did anyone hinder Serb editors from adding Cyrillic to all Federation-related articles? As far as I am concerned, you can start right away. Serbian is after all an official language of the Federation, and Bosnian itself also uses Cyrillic, officially. So yes, that was the agreement, Cyrillic everywhere, but dropping the Serbian prefix for obvious neutrality reasons. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mostar terrorist attack at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of references

Why do you delete references? Add your content again without deleting sources. --Munja-x86 (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

The only source I had intention to delete was "Globalx.ba". Mistakenly, I did erased one other source. It is returned. Moreover, the claim apparently supported by Globalx is already mentioned by the Balkaninsight. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 14:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Fine if you deleted globalx source (we can say it's not reliable), but it was deleted much more. Why do you keep pursuing "anti-serb sentiment"? Edit made by User:Sabahudin9 is much more neutral and precise. Looks like you are pushing POV. --Munja-x86 (talk) 14:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

How come? User:Sabahudin9 wrote "but believed to be retribution against Serbs for the 1992 murder of the shooters father by the Army of the Republika Srpska and the police of Zvornik during the Bosnian War". Much is believed. The attacker was a radical Islamist, as supported by various sources, who shouted "Allahu akbar" during the attack. You'd claim there's no religious component in this attack? We can replace anti-Serb sentiment to "retribution against the VRS" --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Misliš da te ne pratim šta radiš? Nasilno namećeš srpsko, pravoslavno, kršćansko i slično, a pljuješ po islamu i povezuješ sve moguće događaje s islamskim terorizmom. Pravljenje lokacijske karte Republike Srpske dovoljno govori o tvom načinu razmišljanja. Šta fali lokacijskoj karti Bosne i Hercegovine? Kako očekuješ da tvoje izmjene uzmemo kao relevantne? --Munja-x86 (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Ако мислиш да дискутујеш са мном, онда барем да не нападаш ад хоминем. Локацијска карта ми је ирелевантна, локацијској карти БиХ не фали ништа. Да ли требам да очекујем нешто од тебе? Држи се теме о којој се дискутује, остале ствари не требају да те интересују. Убудуће нећу уопште да ти одговарам на поруке овакве врсте, а надам се да ће ти следећа порука бити на енглеском, у супротном ни тада нећу да одговорим. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

You have written on your user-page that you know B/C/S language, so I think it's fine if I talk with you in that language. OK, if Bosnian location map is fine, then why did you put RS map instead on some geography articles? --Munja-x86 (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

I know the language, however, since this is Wikipedia in English, and not in Serbo-Croatian language, it is better if we communicate in English language. Srpska location map is fine as well. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

For me, and many other it's not! RS is not state, just entity. Also Bosnia is not so big to have many maps.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Munja-x86 (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me about the discussion, I become aware of it when you linked my username. :) Republika Srpska is a federal unit, you can call it whatever you like, it's a part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and I really cannot see why this is a problem to you. We will continue our discussion at ANI, and not my talk page. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 19:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Name

Hello, out of pure curiosity, you changed your name?? Or are there two of you? :)))) --Oranges Juicy (talk) 11:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Changed it. It was first AnulManul, then I changed it to Yerevani Axjik, which nobody couldn't remember... so I changed my name for a second time to AnulBanul. --AnulBanul (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Have a nice one! <3 ArmenMM (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. :) --AnulBanul (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Map, regarding Brčko

Zdravo! :) I don't intend to comment on specific usages of File:Republika Srpska location map.svg, but I'd suggest that the Brčko District might be better represented with a diagonal stripe pattern (something like this), as it belongs to both entities. On the other hand, it might make the map a bit confusing for the general readership, so I don't know... It's just a suggestion. Vladimir (talk) 17:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Not a problem, I'll modify the map. It's a good idea. --AnulBanul (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, it's done. It just needs to be updated or something... --AnulBanul (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Good job, I clicked the top thumbnail. Some time ago when I uploaded a new version of a file, the change was also not immediately reflected. Vladimir (talk) 17:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

There's a relatively new article, Archives of Republika Srpska. Maybe it could be featured some time on the Republika Srpska Portal :) Vladimir (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mostar car bombing

Thank you for your help with DYK Victuallers (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Zvornik police station shooting

Republika Srpska is within the framework of the government of BiH in the sense of being an authority. I simply wished to reduce a convoluted section of the article and still feel that this can be done if we say "authorities on all levels". --Oranges Juicy (talk) 06:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

That's fine, that sentence would be fine as well. --AnulBanul (talk) 06:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll amend. --Oranges Juicy (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Serb/Serbian

I think that the proper use for Serb minority parties is "Serb" and not "Serbian". However, if the party uses "Serbian" in English, I support moving it to the latter. Their official page is only in Serbian language.

These use "Serb Democratic Party":

• Council of Europe: Parliamentary Assembly (8 November 2006). Documents: working papers, 2006 ordinary session (first part), 23 -27 January 2006, Vol. 2: Documents 10770-10823. Council of Europe. pp. 152–. ISBN 978-92-871-5955-7.
• International Chamber of Commerce (1 November 2003). Europe Review 2003/04: The Economic and Business Report. Kogan Page Publishers. pp. 56–. ISBN 978-0-7494-4067-1.
• Mirko Pejanović (2004). Through Bosnian Eyes: The Political Memoir of a Bosnian Serb. Purdue University Press. pp. 17–. ISBN 978-1-55753-359-3.
• Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Public Affairs. The World Factbook 2008. Government Printing Office. pp. 78–. ISBN 978-0-16-087361-4., and again in 2009 and 2015
• Bosnia peace operation mission, structure, and transition strategy of NATO's Stabilization Force : report to the chairman, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate. DIANE Publishing. pp. 23–. ISBN 978-1-4289-7530-9.
• Radovan V. Karadžić; Momo Kapor (2005). Intervjui i govori dr Radovana Karadžića. Međunarodni odbor za istinu o Radovanu Karadžiću. p. 138.

I think you should revert your moves.--Zoupan 20:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3

See a proposal for two topic bans to deal with this case. You can reply at AN3 if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic ban for three months from anything to do with Bosnia and Herzegovina on all pages of Wikipedia, including talk pages and noticeboards

You have been sanctioned because of edit warring and POV pushing on Bosnian topics. See the two reports at AN3.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EdJohnston (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

This ban expires on 26 August 2015. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

:)

)--Dragodol (talk) 04:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Violation of your topic ban

To enforce an arbitration decision and for Violation of your topic ban from everything to do with Bosnia on all pages of Wikipedia, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Per this edit at User:UBX/User Republika Srpska. The Republika Srpska is a political unit within Bosnia-Herzegovina, so this violates your ban. EdJohnston (talk) 17:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

EdJohnston, you might be interested in Template:Did you know nominations/Bosniac National Council, a much more straightforward topic ban violation. Surtsicna (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bosniac National Council is a political group in Serbia, and it represents people from the Sandžak, which is not in Bosnia. It does use the word 'Bosniak' which has multiple meanings. But there is no direct connection to Bosnia, so I would allow it. I agree that it's a grey area. But if AnulBanul is making DYKs it seems he is interested in creating content, and in the past Arbcom has been in favor of that when interpreting bans. EdJohnston (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Mentioned

Your name was mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#AnulBanul (Wustenfuchs) topic ban evasion, though you don't have to respond. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

If this IP is really you then you are clearly violating your topic ban. In that case a block for the remaining duration of the ban (until August 26) would be the obvious remedy. EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Per this comment the IPs are you. It seems to me there's little choice but to block you until August 26 for violating your topic ban. Can you see any alternative? EdJohnston (talk) 20:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

OK, now blocked for ten days. Please be more careful in the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Kasich may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | children = Emma Kasich {{small|daughter)}}{{-}}Reese Kasich {{small|(daughter)}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bosniac National Council

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:06, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenia–Serbia relations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenia–Serbia relations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 12:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenia–Serbia relations

The article Armenia–Serbia relations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armenia–Serbia relations for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 14:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenia–Serbia relations

The article Armenia–Serbia relations you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Armenia–Serbia relations for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenia–Croatia relations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenia–Croatia relations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winner 42 -- Winner 42 (talk) 04:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenia–Croatia relations

The article Armenia–Croatia relations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armenia–Croatia relations for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winner 42 -- Winner 42 (talk) 16:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenia–Croatia relations

The article Armenia–Croatia relations you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Armenia–Croatia relations for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winner 42 -- Winner 42 (talk) 16:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zvornik police station shooting

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zvornik police station shooting you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Republika Srpska

Portal:Republika Srpska, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Republika Srpska and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Republika Srpska during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)