User talk:Arabic muslim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Islamic view of anal sex appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Islamic view of anal sex constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Islamic view of anal sex. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 19:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content at Islamic view of anal sex[edit]

While I can see that you have issues with the content of Islamic view of anal sex, your most recent edit removes significant amounts of content that differs from your position and that is backed by reliable and verifiable sources. This kind of edit warring is disruptive and needs to be stopped. If you have sources that disagree with the positions taken in the article, then leave the original content as is and add content to show that there is disagreement. Do not remove sourced content without a valid explanation and proper discussion on the article's talk page. Alansohn (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing and using an IP to continue this behavior. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Icestorm815Talk 20:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arabic muslim as well. Icestorm815Talk 20:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anal sex is prohibited in Islam[edit]

{{unblock|1=This is unfair. I have modified the article and for each statement I put a reference. This article contains a contradictions, and it is about the ISLAMIC view of anal sex, which either a permitted sex action or prohibited sex action. I couldn't find a single reference that state it is a permitted action in Islam! However, some people are want to keep it as it is for a hidden reason.
As a justification for what I'm saying , take a look at the first statement in this article. There is no reference for it, while my statement, which has been deleted has 2 references. Moreover, go through the article it take a statement (hadith) from a respected reference, but the interpretation of that (hadith) is taken from a non-muslim website.
Keeping this article as it is, raise a big question in regards of the credibility of the administrator and the people who keep removing my statement.Arabic muslim (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

The block has expired, so this request is moot.--chaser (talk) 02:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps, but you're doing it wrong. First of all, substantive changes to an article should be discussed on the article talk page first. Secondly, you're just cutting-and-pasting from [1]; we don't allow plagiarism here, much less copyright violation. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is a classic example of Orientalism, which is imitation or depiction of aspects of Eastern cultures in the West by writers. Here some budding ORIENTALISTS are congratulating themselves that they have written a well sourced article on a subject about which they actually know nothing. And insisting that correct edits by User:Arabic muslim are Vandalism.

--ChJameel (talk) 13:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]