User talk:Arghya1999

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arghya1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have edited the page "Mirza Ghulam Ahmed" wrongfully for suspecting his suspected religious ambiguity. Arghya1999 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome![edit]

Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia, Arghya1999! Thank you for your contributions. I am Yash! and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Yash! 05:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heyo Arghya1999! I appreciate you editing this site and trying to fix the things that appear wrong. Thanks for editing my userpage and using the full names for Messi, Rossi and Curry. I liked that change. However, it won't be like that always. Userpages are usually edited by the editor whose userpage it is and not all the changes will be welcome. In no way I am saying that what you do is wrong, but it is better not to edit someone's userpage unless you find any obvious mistake. Today you changed "Independence Day (Pakistan)" to "Independence Day (India)". That was wrong since I brought the article about the Pakistan holiday to WP:GA status. Read the links that were in my welcome message and do keep editing. You are doing good and I hope you will continue the practice. If you ever have any questions, leave a message on my talk page. I will be happy to help. Regards, Yash! 18:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ISKCON's 4 regs[edit]

Hi Arghya1999, I appreciate your efforts to expand the list of prohibited foodstuffs but I think it might be better for clarity to keep this simple, more along the lines of ISKCON's official propaganda. Otherwise we could add gelatine (as in jelly), rennet (in cheese), red lentils (aka masoor dhal), leeks, cochineal (red food dye), edible bone filler in tablets, gelatin again (as in medicinal capsules) – the list goes on and on, if you see my point! So, I hope you don't mind if I revert your edit :-) Samsbanned (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you can revert it. Arghya Biswas 06:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool[edit]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Vinegarymass911. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bangladesh Army has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Army[edit]

@Arghya Bangladesh Army has no reserve troops...please see the given references carefully in the article . o flower! 9:59 AM, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Gulumeemee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Eastern Railway zone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Gulumeemee (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indic Script[edit]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Bihar, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indic Script Related.[edit]

Okay for that! Arghya Biswas 15:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

High Altitude Service Medal moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, High Altitude Service Medal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Catorce2016 (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:High Altitude Service Medal concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:High Altitude Service Medal, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:High Altitude Service Medal[edit]

Hello, Arghya1999. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "High Altitude Service Medal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Order of the British Empire, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No, GBE|KBE|DBE|MBE do not redirect there. David Biddulph (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sir. I'll try to discuss. Arghya Biswas 19:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Proletarians of all countries, unite! (disambiguation)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Proletarians of all countries, unite! (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Danski454 (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed at username change request[edit]

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Sam-2727 (talk) 01:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 05:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Attention needed at username change request[edit]

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. It's not for you to decide who is/isn't a Muslim, nor is there any one "true" branch that can decide what others are/aren't authentic. DMacks (talk) 09:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your vandalism. Ahmadiyya is Kaffir, Kaffir, Kaffir. You bitch is also infidel, felon. Arghya1999 (talk) 09:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Mosesheron (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 11:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arghya1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

actually I edited the pages "Mirza Ghulam Ahmed" for his suspected religious ambiguity. But actually I didn't understand it. So it will be better for unblocking me because my confusion has been cleared. Arghya1999 (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arghya1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I also confess about my wrong edit in the wikipedia and for this reason I want to unblock my account.Arghya1999 (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please specifically describe what exactly you did wrong, what steps you will take to avoid doing it again, and describe what constructive contributions you want to make. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #41803 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]