User talk:Arun.upadhyay1947

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Homework have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sri Malladi Suribabu[edit]

Hello, Arun.upadhyay1947. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Sri Malladi Suribabu.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Shahpur Bamheta, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Arun.upadhyay1947! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prometheus School moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Prometheus School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QA Infotech moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, QA Infotech, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Information icon

Hello Arun.upadhyay1947. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Arun.upadhyay1947. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Arun.upadhyay1947|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages.[edit]

Please stop moving pages. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is ‎QA InfoTech. Thank you. — GSS (talk|c|em) 09:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 12:54, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arun.upadhyay1947 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not spamming, was trying to add information about my company on Wikipedia. As other companies like Tricentis is also listed in wikipedia, I have provided the genuine refrences. I will take care of this thing next time. I am still learning Wiki Guidelines. If possible then please unblock and I will come up with better contibution

Decline reason:

We aren't interested in what you have to say about the company. You will not be unblocked to continue violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you @Yamla for the feedback. But I want to know if my article was promotional, then can you let me know if this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricentis is not promotional. I have just used the same language and kind of same content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arun.upadhyay1947 (talk • contribs)

That's not relevant because of WP:OTHERSTUFF. Nor have you provided any evidence that the other article was written by employees of that company (though if so, that would be grounds for deleting that article, not for allowing you to violate these policies). --Yamla (talk) 14:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not only a case of undisclosed paid but sockpuppetry too. @Arun.upadhyay1947 can you please disclose who asked you to move Draft:Adhyan Dhara and what is your connection with user "Lopev.7"? ‎GSS (talk|c|em) 14:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Prometheus School concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Prometheus School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:QA InfoTech concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:QA InfoTech, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prometheus School[edit]

Hello, Arun.upadhyay1947. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prometheus School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:QA InfoTech[edit]

Hello, Arun.upadhyay1947. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "QA InfoTech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Arun.upadhyay1947! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:02, Wednesday, April 27, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Arun.upadhyay1947! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:02, Wednesday, April 27, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arun.upadhyay1947&oldid=1084926177"