User talk:Axem Titanium/Archive 10

Missing important parts

Thanks. Tried to remember it on every one I edited, but success was varied. :) --IznoRepeat (talk) 04:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Cyberbrain

Hi there!

I see that in 2010, shortly after I spent a while cleaning up the article "Cyberbrain", which was a horrendous overlong mess, you merged it into World of Ghost in the Shell. Great result! Thanks for that.

Best, — Hex (❝?!❞) 02:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC) .

Not a problem, though you certainly made my job a lot easier with your initial trim. It doesn't look like I had to change much after the merge, like I did with most of the other merged articles. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Ranma ½ chapters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Skating rink and Poker face (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for being patient

with all my nitpicking. I think I've finally finished my comments on the Capcom Five! Mark Arsten (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Worry not. All your comments will lead to a better article. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Persona 4: Arena

The majority of reliable sources use the name "Persona 4: Arena" including the colon. Therefore, per WP:COMMONNAME, the colon version should be used and you have just done a massive dick move by editing the redirect, thereby preventing any moves from being made, again.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Looking at Google News hits, there seems to be a rather even split between using the colon and not, perhaps leaning towards not. Here are plenty of reliable examples. Also, the most reliable source in this case is Atlus' website, which confirms the lack of colon. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

New game plus

Please see the guideline I mentioned before hitting the revert button. WP:MOSCAPS makes it clear: "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization. Most capitalization is for proper names, acronyms, and initialisms. Wikipedia relies on sources to determine what is a proper name; words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in sources are treated as proper names and capitalized in Wikipedia." You failed to provide a source whatsoever. --Soetermans. T / C 18:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Bastion FAC

I've addressed all of your points raised at the FAC, if you want to return to it/the article. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 19:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Blank this section if you may

Hello, Axem Titanium. You have new messages at George Ho's talk page.
Message added by George Ho (talk) 16:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Congrats

Congratulations! Cave Story is now a GA! :) All the Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 13:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Whoo! Thanks! Axem Titanium (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: I AM THE BEST ARTIST Rene deletion

i'm not sure i'm addressing this in the proper place but, just in case... i am the author of the article in question, which's my first full-article submission to wiki. learning procedures as i go along. was aware from the start that my references were shaky, but made some effort for the time being as i gathered more. an obstacle for me is, references proving my subjects notability ocurred in an era before the internet, i.e.print media, &though i am not currently in easy access to such records, i know it to exist &my attention to assembling it is ongoing. barring the articles immediate deletion i would nonetheless like to add a photo, but am unsure of the procedure; any assistance in doing so is appreciated!Penwatchdog (talk) 07:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

hiya Axem & THANKS for your support~ i just went "live" with a full rewrite/revise of the article, which now includes the many new references which have been supplied... about the "deletion" banner which still tops the article: is that to be left to the proper authorities to delete?Penwatchdog (talk)

Looks like it was taken care of. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Idle Thumbs

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 08:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Trackback

I've replied on my talk page--Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Video game article to run on May 13th:

On the 13th, the video game Limbo is set to run. This is less than a month from your potential nomination of Killer 7. So if you want it to run, I recommend asking the Featured Article Director (User talk:Raul654)if it would conflict with yours. I don't really know either way. It could still run. You may request to have Limbo run on another day. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 00:11, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind, I thought Killer 7 was running in June. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

PROD of List of Halo multiplayer maps

Hi. Thanks for your input on the above list. I've removed the PROD notice and explained why on the talk page; you might wish to take a look. If you still wish to pursue deletion, I would appreciate it if you went through the AfD process. Regards Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Axem Titanium. You have new messages at Template:Did_you_know_nominations/France–Serbia_relations.
Message added 20:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WhiteWriter^speaks 20:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for République

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

RE:Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cave Story/archive1

Hi. The reason I didn't offer my support was because I haven't yet read through the entire article; I only went as far as picking up those bits I commented upon. I'll try to read it at some point before the end of the nomination and get back to you. Thanks. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. Been busy with work and other commitments, so I've had barely any time for Wikipedia in general. Don't think I'm going to be able to muster the time to look over the article. Sorry! MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

RE:Cave Story FAC

Yeah sure, I'll "check in" tommorow. Oh, and since we're talking about FACs, would you mind voting at the Ed, Edd n Eddy FAC, because there have been only two votes (minus a bunch of resolced comments), and the the article's at FAC for nearly a month! Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 19:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Note: I'm checking in today. Giving it a read-through, looks like it'll get my Support. --Khanassassin ☪ 19:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

And, yes, you earned my support. Good job! Or should I say featured now? :) --Khanassassin ☪ 19:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey, Axem, hi again! I'm just making sure, do you support Ed, Edd n Eddy at the FAC or Oppose? :) All the Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 17:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

You're right about that, actually. It was a fellow editor that suggested that the "AKA" trivia etc. should be kept, but whatever... I removed it now. I just changed the "The Three Stooges" sentence in to two, don't know what to do any further, lol... :) --Khanassassin ☪ 17:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi there!

Hey there, I'm glad to hear someone else is on top of this! It's really addicting to scramble to make it haha, although I don't mean to cut you off from the thrill. Thankfully Move is over! CaseyPenk (talk) 02:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I feel kinda dirty using the word "DYK".. but that's fantastic! Thanks for the tip. Knowing the Wikipedia editor demographics, I'm confident Watch Dogs will make it. CaseyPenk (talk) 02:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

I noticed that most of the articles I would have liked to nominate (Sony and Microsoft cough cough) are a little bit out of the time window, but I'm working on Pink Gorilla right now to promote that up. If there's something I like as much as new games.. it's retro games! CaseyPenk (talk) 06:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Watch Dogs

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

LDR tool

You might care to try:

• User:PleaseStand/References segregator

It speeds the work. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 15:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh, thanks. I'll use that the next time I convert refs to LDR. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Killer7

This is a note to let the main editors of Killer7 know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 7, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 7, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Killer7 logo

Killer7 is an action-adventure video game developed by Grasshopper Manufacture and published by Capcom. Suda51 wrote and directed the game, his first to be released outside Japan on July 7, 2005. Killer7 features first-person shooter elements and a unique "on rails" control scheme, but the core adventure-style gameplay has been compared to Myst and Snatcher. The game follows an elite group of assassins called the "killer7". The assassins, physical manifestations of one man Harman Smith, perform hits on behalf of the United States government. Through these missions, the killer7 uncover a deeper conspiracy regarding the role of Japan in US politics and secrets about the nature of their organization. The game received polarized reviews due to its unconventional control scheme and complex noir plot. Jack Thompson, an outspoken video game activist, alleged that the game contains "full-blown sex sequences", but his claims were ultimately refuted. Despite these setbacks, Killer7's cult appeal led to remakes of Suda51's older works and the successful launch of No More Heroes. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:Ed FA

Thanks! And I completely forgot to congratulate you on the Cave Story FA! Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 10:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Then look again

http://na.square-enix.com/ff7acc/

Page title in the browser: "FINAL FANTASY VII: ADVENT CHILDREN COMPLETE | SQUARE ENIX".

And next time, ask anyone before moving articles. --Niemti (talk) 13:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

On the spine and at the bottom of the page. Cheers, Axem Titanium (talk) 13:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

It's a Japanese website. Also, other major websites write it this way: IMDb, ANN, GameSpot, IGN, Variety, even Wikia or Facebook. The only ones who don't, use "-" instead, like RT or Amazon. But absolutely nobody writes as just one string of words. See Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names. And ask before moving articles. --Niemti (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't believe I have to ask anyone before doing something. But, since you objected, I'll discuss it. The article had stood without the colon for 6 years (since 2006) and was only moved in the past month (without discussion or "asking", mind you). It passed GA in 2011 without the colon. To rebut your arguments: 1) it's a Japanese website for a Japanese product. Shouldn't that matter? 2) It's ON THE SPINE OF THE PRODUCT ITSELF. That probably trumps anything the website might say. COMMONNAME generally applies when the "official" name is much more complicated and difficult to search for than the name used in common parlance. In this case, it's actually more simple so there's no need to make it more complicated. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes it should it matter, because it's English Wikipedia, not the Japanese one. And this is not only by far the most common (Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names including all the reliable third-party sources) but also currently the official one, as seen at http://na.square-enix.com/ff7acc/ - and "It's ON THE SPINE OF THE PRODUCT ITSELF" is just original reseach, unsupported by no reliable sources as for being an official name. The original rename was 100% right, that's why it was uncontested, and it turned out this article was not so much of a GA, after all. --Niemti (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Are you serious? Looking at the spine of the product is "original research"? This is ridiculous. Look at your life; look at your choices. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes. Because this is just your personal interpretation, going contrary to what almost everyone else have decided for (that's including IMDb and ANN, and various gaming websites such as IGN or GameSpot, and non-gaming such as Variety) AND what is the most common name according to random people (including at Wikia and Facebook) AND what the newest official website says is the official English title. It's your own original research VS the world, so go and revert (instead of trying to talk with me about the meaning of life or something). You can't go on like that with some "I'm right, EVERYONE else is wrong, look at your life; look at your choices." The other notable alternative naming is "Final Fantasy VII Fantasy - Advent Children" (like on RT) but that is far less common and was never official too. --Niemti (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Looking at the physical product counts as "sourcing the work itself", not original research. I'm not personally interpreting anything; the words are right there, no interpretation necessary! I'm not saying I'm right, everyone else is wrong; I'm saying that the product in question (the film, FFVIIAC) CALLS ITSELF "Final Fantasy VII Advent Children". I'm still confused why I'm the one being yelled at for changing something without discussion when it was changed from the 6 year old precedent just last month and I was just changing it back. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not yelling, and I notified Bertaut‎. --Niemti (talk) 16:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I opened up a formal discussion here. No need to call the cavalry onto my talk page. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy FLC

Hi, Axem! I was just wondering, could you take a look at the List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes FLC? :) All the best, --Khanassassin ☪ 22:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to take a look at it in the next couple of days. Relatedly, perhaps you'd be interested in taking a look at my current FAC below? Regards, Axem Titanium (talk) 17:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Read the article, supported (.hack). Could you please check the responses to your comments at my FLC? :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 17:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: .hack

I'm planning on posting comments tonight. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 13:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem, thanks a lot for the review. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to hit it up tonight or early tomorrow. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)