User talk:B7T
Gokrida[edit]
Don't worry, this isn't anything personal and I didn't stumble upon the article via you but by via one of the categories the article is in. --Sloane 16:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't really thinking it was. Not a problem. B7T 19:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Re : GoKrida AfD relist; browser-based games policy/guidelines[edit]
Yeah, there's very few voters for AfD these days, which is why some AfD don't seem to get much response even after a week or so. I decided to keep away from direct voting for AfD at the moment, as per the principle that AfD closers should not be an adovacy for or aganist the article itself (for impartiality). - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 15:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008[edit]
|
The Space-Time Telegraph |
| ||||
| The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter | ||||||
| Issue 1 | March 2008 | |||||
For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC) | ||||||
I'm interested in adding book sources to articles.[edit]
{{helpme}}
I've added ISBN numbers to books mentioned in articles before, with a link to the special page allowing you to find a copy of that book; but I've noticed that there are a number of articles where no number was given. Now it's possible that this is because there are several editions of a book, but it may be that people are unaware of this feature of Wikipedia. Is there a WikiProject for people interested in adding this feature to articles that mention books or other media with ISBN numbers? Are there other standards used in addition to ISBN numbers, like Library of Congress catalog card numbers, record company catalog numbers, or UPC codes? Can you direct me to any relevant articles for Wikipedia editors? B7T (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Did you check out WP:ISBN and Wikipedia:Book Sources Legosock (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Biography Assesment Requests[edit]
Hey, found your assesment for your Pu Ru article on the Biography:Assessment page, but a better place might be here: Requesting an assessment69.92.175.16 (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted userpages[edit]
FYI, if you have a need to delete your own user pages/subpages in future, you can use {{db-userreq}}, which will draw admins' attention to your request more quickly than plain old {{db}}. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Laugh track[edit]
Just wanted to say "thank you" for your work in the laugh track article (TOC right template to eliminate whitespace/scrolling). Much appreciated.Oanabay04 (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of I like pie for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I like pie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I like pie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster talk 01:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Mark Surman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Universal Space for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universal Space is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Space until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, B7T. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, B7T. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, B7T. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing—KidZui—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mrwoogi010✉ 16:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of List of fictional nannies for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional nannies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional nannies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PivotX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)