User talk:BetterSkatez

Eoarthropleura; Temporal range: Upper Silurian–Lower Devonian PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Arthropoda
Subphylum:	Myriapoda
Class:	Arthropleuridea
Order:	Eoarthropleuridea; Shear & Selden, 1995
Family:	Eoarthropleuridae; Størmer, 1976
Genus:	Eoarthropleura; Størmer, 1976

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BetterSkatez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Calm As Midnight 04:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaigas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kaigas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Calm As Midnight 04:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Club Penguin because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 00:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CVUA[edit]

We see that you need a little more understanding of Counter-Vandalism before you're granted Rollback. The Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy exists to help users, like yourself, understand the way to identify and handle vandalism through one-on-one instruction. Perhaps you'd like to ask a question of our instructors, or enroll in the Academy. Happy editing!

Dan653 (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Sriharsh1234. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Timeline of computer viruses and worms because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sriharsh1234 05:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Club Penguin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Begoon ^talk 03:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time templates[edit]

Before adding geological time templates to articles please check to see the results. If it produces red as this edit did, then fix the redlink first. Vsmith (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Jab843. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Barney & Friends without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jab843 (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hot Problems because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya ^(Hello!) 15:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Begoon ^talk 08:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Barney the purple and green dinosaur & Friends[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Barney the purple and green dinosaur & Friends, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Dora the Explorer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Indefinite for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peridon (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BetterSkatez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admitted that I done a severe vandalism and I deserved to be blocked because of the bad things I were doing I had made many vandalisms as of What I did of moving pages Dora the Explorer to Dora the C**t and Barney and friends aswell as placing a whole article of Hurricane Katrina on Dora the Explorer and it was all my fault, Although I don't do it every day, When I was bored, I felt like doing Vandalism to stuff and shows I hate such as Dora the Explorer,Club Penguin, and Chinooks, I read as much as I could so I can give something reasonable, My vandalism's on wikipedia were quite severe and included alot of bad words and hating, as the vandalism I did, I also attempted to revert it back for people to read the article they were supposed to be reading, I understand that this is wrong to vandalise wikipedia and I will never do it again, can you shorten my block to 3 Months please and I will never do any vandalism ever again for the rest of my life, Please and Thank you. (If this doesn't get accepted I will quit wikipedia forever or add another request involving a better reason.) BetterSkatez (talk) 00:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
• do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
• do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
• do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
• do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.

Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BetterSkatez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand and read the rules, I know that it is bad and wrong for vandalism, If you accept my request I will contribute to this wiki positively and never do any more vandalism for the rest of my life eternally and I mean it this time, I know that I deserved this block because of vandalism, But this time, I'm turning into a new leaf, A fresh new start to contribution. I'll prove it, Vandalism gets people nowhere and people couldn't get away from doing vandalism, If I would Vandalize pages likeDora the Explorer, I know I must leave the page alone and don't do any negative thing to it, And if I were to contribute it, I need to make sure if it has good spelling and grammar, So i'm going to contribute to the wiki positively, Meaning it, and never do vandalism ever again, Vandalism is what ruins pages and that is a bad thing, I tried to prove that I will not do vandalism ever again and I promise never to do it again, and I'm only going to use this as my account because users shouldn't have alts on Wikipedia because they might think dirty, That's why I'm only going to be on one account and I will be doing a positive contribution on this wiki and I will Regret and Forget about Doing any Vandalism, I'm joining the good side and this time I will actually protect this wiki from vandalism, I'm willing to be following the rules on wikipedia and I will never think of cruelty on wikipedia ever again, I promise. BetterSkatez (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your only chance of being unblocked is to accept the conditions in the offer by Beeblebrox, above, and to perform successfully therein. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, I'll comment. I feel entitled to do so, since I am one of the many people who had to waste a lot of their own time clearing up your mess. I think you're probably very young, and there's some doubt whether you are mature enough to edit an encyclopedia. However, Beeblebrox has made you what I consider to be a very generous offer above. So, all you need to do to take advantage of that offer is follow the instructions, choose an article, copy it here as the instructions above say, and edit it to show what improvements you would make. Then leave a note saying you've finished. That's what I'd be doing in your position instead of messing with wording in another unblock request. Just my advice, in passing... Begoon ^talk 07:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Key To unblocking.[edit]

Eoarthropleura

Eoarthropleura was a genus of millipede-like creatures which lived between the Late Silurian and Early Devonian period.^[1] It was similar to Arthropleura but smaller at about 120 cm long instead of the 250 cm of Arthropleura. It is known only by footprints which makes it hard to classify this animal.

References

^ William Shear & Paul Selden (1995). "Eoarthropleura (Arthropoda, Arthropleurida) from the Silurian of Britain and the Devonian of North America" (PDF). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 196 (3): 347–375.

My Edit (Something I wanted to add to this article): The Eoarthropleura is Identified but Unconfirmed as an Ancestor to the Arthropleura but It normally breathes in water because of the Atmosphere was still Hot and Toxic and Land wasn't habitable enough for creatures to walk on land until the Middle Devonian Period.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BetterSkatez (talk • contribs)

I added a reflist so the references will display here, and some formatting.

Does this proposed addition have a reliable source? If so, it needs to be provided.
The grammar needs some work, too. Why are there random capital letters in your text?
Is there anything else you think needs changing or adding to this article? Begoon ^talk 05:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Edit (Fixing Grammar): The Eoarthropleura is identified but unconfirmed as an ancestor to the Arthropleura but it normally breathes in water because of the atmosphere was still hot and toxic and land wasn't habitable enough for creatures to walk on land until the Middle Devonian Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BetterSkatez (talk • contribs)

This is Stupid![edit]

I cannot get unblocked from editing because that silly admin blocked me forever and No one would ever trust me to getting me unblocked, I hate this place, I'm leaving for good, And I will not talk to you ever again so bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BetterSkatez (talk • contribs)

Well, I think everyone is just waiting for you to answer the questions above, or finish making the "significant and well researched improvements" to the article which the instructions ask for, and say that you are finished.

It's also fine if you don't want to do that, but that's what you would need to do to get unblocked. As I said above, I think it's a very generous offer, given your history of vandalism, but ultimately it is your decision whether to take advantage of the offer or not.

Your tone above, and calling an admin "silly", though, do indicate to me that it might be a good idea for you to wait until you are a good bit more mature before trying to edit a serious encyclopedia - but that's just my opinion. Begoon ^talk 06:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[1] William Shear & Paul Selden (1995). "Eoarthropleura (Arthropoda, Arthropleurida) from the Silurian of Britain and the Devonian of North America" (PDF). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 196 (3): 347–375.

[1]