User talk:BilIsHadToDoItToEm

Hello! Feel free to leave your messages here!

Ninjago[edit]

I am not "upset that the show has ended" or anything like that. But on Ninjago Wiki, it was agreed that it should not be listed as a new series unless a writer explicitly says so, so why should here be different? Also, the trailer refers to it as a new season (although it originally said new series, but that was changed.)85.187.109.81 (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this is literally the same show. The creators refering to it as "season 11" and such is proof of this. Please stop adding false information to articles or I may have to flag down an admin to sort this out.--LegoTimeNinjaelite (talk) 19:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am perfectly aware that people on Ninjago Wiki are fans as well (since I am on there too). My point is that what they agreed on (not listing it as a new series unless a writer explicitly says so) makes sense. And, yes, the trailer used to say new series, but again, it was changed to new season and new season is what it currently says. And how is writers referring to it as Season 11 "barely any evidence"? They are the ones, who make the show. If anyone knows best, whether it is or it is not, it is them.85.187.109.81 (talk) 19:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, here you go. LEGO's YouTube calls it Season 11

<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7-evQUOFYk}}</ref>

. This trailer calls it a new season not a new show.

<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTQiAYxlTAs}}</ref>

. Tommy doesn't outright say anything has changed so we should rush to conclusions.

<ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/TommyAndreasen/status/1168873461512581120}}</ref>

It should be treated as the same show as the official sources fail to accnoledge it as a brand new show. --LegoTimeNinjaelite (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ninjago (TV series). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Ninjago (TV series). Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dorsetonian (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]