Hello BrandonPandyamonium! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Serena Ryder has been reverted. Your edit here to Serena Ryder was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7i0cYlIqmY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored the Tynomi Banks article to draft space again, which you can find here. Please await review prior to attempting to restore it to article space prematurely (you can submit it for review at Articles for Creation by adding the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft). Please ensure you review Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and requirements as well. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDb is not a notability-supporting source, and the Huffington Post just gives her an 18-word blurb in a fashion listicle. To be clear, I live in Toronto and have seen Tynomi's show many times, but the notability test for a Wikipedia article is not simply that she's verifiable as existing -- what's required is that she's been the subject of enough reliable source coverage in media to clear the general notability guideline, which requires several substantive sources and not just one short blurb.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tynomi Banks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tynomi Banks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, BrandonPandyamonium!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 18:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
You have still not added reliable sources that establish her notability. Firstly, people are not notable for appearing in TV shows, films or music videos just because you link to a streaming video copy of the appearance -- to make her notable for that, you have to show that newspapers or magazines have written and published articles about her appearances. So CBC Gem, Breakfast Television and the YouTube or Vimeo links are not notability-supporting sources. Secondly, people are not notable just because they have social networking profiles -- you cannot make a person notable by referencing the article to her own self-published content about herself, so the Facebook and Instagram citations are not notability-supporting sources. Thirdly, you cannot base a person's notability on user-generated sources like Degrassi Wiki. And, unfortunately, that's the only source left here that wasn't already wrecked by the first two points.<ref>Making a person notable is not simply a question of referencing the article to just any web content you can find that happens to technically verify a fact. To make her notable enough for a Wikipedia article, what you need to show is that she has been the subject of third party coverage in real media, that was written in the third person: journalist-written newspaper articles about her, journalist-written magazine articles about her.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tynomi Banks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tynomi Banks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
