User talk:Briansmith451

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?[edit]

  • If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
  • If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
  • If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
  • For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

See also[edit]

Good luck and happy editing. ```Buster Seven Talk 12:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Kansas - Armenia National Guard Partnership, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bjelleklang - talk 09:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kansas - Armenia National Guard Partnership[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kansas - Armenia National Guard Partnership, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 22:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Hi Brian, I think there are a number of problems.

  • It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: in order to exchange knowledge in areas such as emergency management and disaster response, border and port security, economic security, peacekeeping operations and counter terrorism... it still cooperates with the organization on several issues, both through this program but also through others... The Kansas National Guard works closely with the Armenian Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Health, Rescue Service and other governmental offices and agencies... highlight some of the great accomplishments and enduring relationships ]
  • You shouldn't have image galleries, Commons is the place for those. All those images, divorced from the main text, again give a promotional feel to the article.
  • If you recreate, give some thought to independent verifiable sources. Wikipedia and YouTube are not suitable, and you should be careful about relying on the sources themselves for anything that's controversial or a matter of opinion. Having said that, I see that other editors were working to clean up the article, so I'll recreate for now, on the assumption that the issues above will be addressed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about that, try getting a Featured Article through. I'll have another look in a couple of days if I remember Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's fine as long as you bear in mind that they may have their own spin on stuff that isn't purely factual. I don't know if this organisation has ever attracted negative criticism, perhaps from Turkey, but if so, that should go in too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And that's why we do not accept Wikipedia as a reliable source. Coupled with genuine mistakes, a favourite of the cleverer vandal is to slightly tweak numbers and dates, thus avoiding automatic reversion by Cluebot (a very clever anti-vandal bot) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article[edit]

Hi! I'm sorry that your article was deleted, I tried some minor editing but clearly that wasn't enough. I believed the article should be kept, although it didn't have too many independent sources, I'd say it was about a notable subject, and tried adding a source to that effect. Hopefully the article will stay here for now, if you have any questions please feel free to ask! Bjelleklang - talk 20:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made these edits (you shouldn't have fully capitalised titles, only one EL section, refs shouldn't be repeated in EL). It's possible that the YouTube links, often seen as problematic, may be chopped, but if it happens it's probably not worth fighting for. Seems OK now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I made these edits. There are a couple of things need fixing, it's up to if you can be bothered.
  • The external links are have the ] in the wrong place, I've fixed the first one
  • The last two refs aren't displaying properly because there is no title = parameter
No obligation on you to fix these
I assume you are going to do the other 50 or so articles (:

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not on the AfC list, and there is the usual huge backlog there. I've effectively reviewed it anyway, so if I were you, I'd just move it to article space (use the "move" button, don't cut-and-paste). Let me know if there are any problems Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

you misunderstood, I meant move it straight to U.S. European Command State Partnership Program, which I've now done. You probably need to put a project banner or something on the talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For your fine work on the US European Command State Partnership. I am wowed by what I see. Thank you for your excellent contributions to Wikipedia! The Illusive Man(Contact) 03:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation just finishing the official procedure[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Illinois - Poland National Guard Partnership[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Illinois - Poland National Guard Partnership. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Alabama – Romania National Guard Partnership. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Alabama – Romania National Guard Partnership – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Altered Walter (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Indiana - Slovakia National Guard Partnership[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Indiana - Slovakia National Guard Partnership. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Alabama – Romania National Guard Partnership. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Alabama – Romania National Guard Partnership – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Altered Walter (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Briansmith451. You have new messages at Talk:Illinois - Poland National Guard Partnership.
Message added 12:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Altered Walter (talk) 12:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've moved the remaining two drafts to User:Briansmith451/Iowa - Kosovo National Guard Partnership and User:Briansmith451/Georgia - Georgia National Guard Partnership, so they won't get deleted too. Please let me know if you want a hand with moving the pages when they're ready. Thanks, Altered Walter (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Georgia - Georgia National Guard Partnership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted contributions[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Indiana - Slovakia National Guard Partnership article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Altered Walter (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't put my name on the external site, no one can because no one person is the author. Why in the world can't we just put 'U.S. European Command Public Affairs Office authorizes the release of its contents to Wikipedia...'? Briansmith451 (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Putting your name on the external site isn't enough, and citing the source of the copyrighted material also isn't enough: please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information. I've reverted another big chunk of copyrighted material you added to New Jersey - Albania National Guard Partnership: please don't do it again. Thanks, Altered Walter (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You just said "Putting your name on the external site isn't enough...". So that I understand, please confirm that I can use the words from my own site verbatim if I put on my site "I, Brian Smith, am the author of this article, (NGB J53 International Affairs Slovakia / Indiana SPP Update), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike". Also, I understand your position, but please understand that as soon as I finish all 22 pages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._European_Command_State_Partnership_Program), I am sending out an email to all of our Bilateral Affairs Officers in the 22 Embassies and telling them they may begin to work on editing their own page. They are not Wiki experts and all I am trying to do at this point is give them a basic template from which they can go to town and populate their page with great content and their own words. If you can give me til the end of the week, I promise, there will be tons of additional new content. For example, if you look at the U.S. European Command SPP page, you will see many sources and lots of great content. That was my page and my edits, and that's what the other 22 pages will soon look like. I hope that will be ok.

Yes, on your own site you can explicitly release the content under the Creative Commons license, and that will take care of the copyright problem. Thanks for all your hard work here, but when you email out to your colleagues, please make sure you also pass them a link to WP:Conflict of interest: it can very difficult to write objectively about an organization that we're very closely connected with. Thanks, Altered Walter (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. It will take me probably til Friday to get the EUCOM pages updated because there are 22 of them and I have to rely on our Public Affairs office to upload the documents. They are pretty quick though. Thanks for the heads up and for taking the time to explain.

January 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ohio - Hungary National Guard Partnership. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was some automated type of action. I had added an additional source for a total of 3 so I removed it thinking that 3 sources for such a tiny article would be enough. I'm still working on it.

It really isn't a problem of numbers. You do not have any independent, reliable sources. Everything is either referenced to the ONG or the government. You need references from books, magazines, newspapers, etc., some sort of reference that has a fact checking process in place (in other words not most websites). You will find material on what makes a source reliable here: WP:RS. Encyclopedias are what is known as tertiary sources. We only publish stuff that other reliable sources are writing about. You need sources like newspapers, etc. to show the notability of your subject. See WP:GNG. also, when you post on any talkpage, please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. BTW, here is something that I just sent to another Wiki admin, so that you know where I am trying to take these pages... "I am sending out an email to all of our Bilateral Affairs Officers in the 22 Embassies and telling them they may begin to work on editing their own page. They are not Wiki experts and all I am trying to do at this point is give them a basic template from which they can go to town and populate their page with great content and their own words. If you can give me til the end of the week, I promise, there will be tons of additional new content. For example, if you look at the U.S. European Command SPP page, you will see many sources and lots of great content. That was my page and my edits, and that's what the other 22 pages will soon look like. I hope that will be ok."

Firstly, I am not an administrator. I am an editor just like you. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. We police ourselves for the most part. There are administrators of course, but they mostly stay out of content discussion. Secondly, I personally don't think that was such a good idea. People closely associated with a subject are discouraged from writing articles about the subject. see WP:COI. anyway, even though the overall tone of my communication with you has been kinda negative, I do wish you luck. If I can help you at all, don't hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I love Wiki and understand why it has all the rules it has, but the one thing that baffles me and is completely illogical imo, is that subject matter experts are the ones they discourage most from writing on the subject. There aren't many people that can put together a page on U.S. European Command like I have, and anyone that could would have to be an expert on it just like me. They might not work for the Command, but they couldn't possibly do the subject of State Partnership justice without being closely associated with the subject. Just doesn't make sense to me. I will continue to populate the pages with good information and encourage other subject matter experts to do the same. If someone wants to delete the content just because the people that wrote it are too closely associated with the subject, then that would be a shame. Nevertheless, thanks for the heads up and thanks for volunteering your efforts.

IMHO they do that to force writers to write from sources rather than personal knowledge. Also, it is not so much an issue in your case, as being military you know how to keep it all "Joe Friday" (just the facts, maam) cause that is how you have to write for your job. But with businesses and musicians and schools and towns, people closely connected just can't seem to keep a perspective on what they are writing and it ends up sounding like ad copy, not an encyclopedia article.Gtwfan52 (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Michigan - Latvia National Guard Partnership (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Andris Berzins
Vermont - Macedonia National Guard Partnership (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Macedonia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Briansmith451. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 20:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Briansmith451. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 11:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Briansmith451. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 12:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transatlantic Collaborative Biological Resiliency Demonstration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Guard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

State partnerships[edit]

You seem to be the principal editor for the US National Guard state partnership pages. I'd like to suggest that some of the material is essentially duplicated on the various pages, which is perfectly reasonable, as all the groups have the same general purposes, and it might be enough to cover some of it on the general page. Some of the historical background may also be unnecessary--the history of the Societ successor states is covered in the articles on them and just needs to be linked. I'm also not sure all the photos are meaningful to an encyclopedia: pictures of groups in action, yes; the formal pictures of everyone lined up on an air field, not really.

But, more important, some of the material is copied from various state national guard sites, such as the paragraph sourced by ref 10 in Kansas – Armenia National Guard Partnership. Unlike US Government pages, these are protected by copyright, and can be not used without a formal license under our usual free licensing terms, which is not likely to be forthcoming from a state government. (A few states, like California, have their web sites in the public domain, and this does not apply) Some parts are copied from US Govt pages, which is OK as far as copyright is concerned, but still amounts to Plagiarism, unless the exact material copied is indicated by quotation marks or otherwise--as an example, the California page does it properly. There's still a question of whether the full quotes are needed, as the style is, as would be expected, more bureaucratic than encyclopedic. I'm not really eager to go through them all and fix these things , though I will if I have to--but as you know the subject better, you could do a better job of it. DGG ( talk ) 00:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force Training (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 21:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl oh hello! 21:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

US ambassador in Armenia[edit]

Hello dear User. I have a question: who is the current US ambassador in Armenia? In this article it's written the John A. Heffern is. But here it is written Richard Mills (I have heard a new ambassador has been appointed in Armenia in December 2014). So where is a mistake? M.Karelin (talk) 06:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force Training (April 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force Training for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force Training is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force Training until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 17:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Briansmith451. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force Training, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Combating Transnational Organized Crime has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Combating Transnational Organized Crime. Thanks! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Combating Transnational Organized Crime (September 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KSFT was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KSFTC 20:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Combating Transnational Organized Crime (October 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Combating Transnational Organized Crime concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Combating Transnational Organized Crime, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Combating Transnational Organized Crime[edit]

Hello, Briansmith451. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Combating Transnational Organized Crime".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Briansmith451. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transatlantic Collaborative Biological Resiliency Demonstration[edit]

Notice

The article Transatlantic Collaborative Biological Resiliency Demonstration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, self-references, reads like a press release

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Briansmith451&oldid=1142905212"