User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 171
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 165 | ← | Archive 169 | Archive 170 | Archive 171 | Archive 172 | Archive 173 | → | Archive 175 |
Tree traversal: protection?
Hi! In Nov 2019 you helped me to protect the article Program synthesis (see User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 73 - thanks again!). Therefore I dare to ask you again with a similar problem.
On 21 Oct 2019, I changed "Pre-order" to "Post-order" in the first sentence of Tree traversal#Applications. Since then, this edit has been reverted several times; I therefore started a discussion at Talk:Tree_traversal#Tree_duplication_in_pre-_or_in_post-order?, elaboration on my reasons. However, nobody showed up there. Instead, reverting (and my counter-reverting) is going on, the most recent occurring today. I feel that since I tried (and still try) to discuss, it is ok when I engage in this kind of edit-war - correct me if I'm wrong. If not, I wonder if we can do better, such as blocking the page for anonymous users. Could you help me with that?
Many thanks in advance. Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- I just submitted a request. CLCStudent (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2020 (UTC)