User talk:CX Zoom/Archives/2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ARCHIVES
(Messages on talk page with no activity for more than 6 months will be archived manually.)
2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023
Newsletters & automated messages
Newsletters (sub) 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024
FRS 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024
Userpage • Talkpage • Contributions • Other useful links

Current U.S. representatives templates

Hey, you've created all these Template:Current U.S. representatives from Alabama style templates but haven't used them in any article. Are these abandoned? Gonnym (talk) 10:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: I made them to standardise the list of representatives across the various articles such as United States congressional delegations from Alabama, Alabama's congressional districts, List of United States representatives from Alabama, and so on for the various states. After doing it for certain states, I lost access to my PC, and now I'm editing only from mobile, and doing this on mobile is very painful. So I wasn't able to complete the project but the existing ones are ready to use and I'll update it accordingly in a week or so. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 13:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
6 months later they are still unused. Gonnym (talk) 06:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: Most have at least 1 non-self transclusion, the only ones that do not are Delaware, Montana, ND, SD, Wyoming. Those in this list (User:CX Zoom/TestPage18) have 2 transclusions. I know I've been very slow, but I'm going to blame my exam schedule and ADHD-brain for that. *Hopefully* by the end of this month I shall complete it. Thanks for trouting! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 10:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at Wikipedia:Database_reports/Unused_templates/1 there are 5 representative templates, and 45 senators templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair thing, the senator templates will have transclusions, as this list (User:CX Zoom/TestPage18) continues to get updated. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 13:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Responded at user's talk page (User talk:2409:4060:E80:85C1:0:0:58C8:B30E § Regarding your message at my talk page) ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 13:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of Joe Biden's political career

Template:Timeline of Joe Biden's political career has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 05:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 19:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of Nancy Pelosi's political career

Template:Timeline of Nancy Pelosi's political career has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 19:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template section sizes

Hello. Regarding your recent edits to Module:Section sizes, would you please reinstate the "hidden" subsection total sizes from the "Section total" column? These are needed to properly sort the table. --Ita140188 (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ita140188: I was unaware that it was required for proper sorting. Thanks for letting me know. The existing coloring did not give intended result when WP:Dark mode (gadget), etc. were used. So I removed it. I'll change it to color:transparent to (probably) fix both the issues. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 09:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:US multiparty balance shading

Template:US multiparty balance shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 14:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

Hello, CX Zoom. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 13:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PVI

Template:PVI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 14:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change code to allow move of Template:Rfc

Hello. I have closed the template RM. Are you ok to do the code changes needed before the template is moved? Pinging @EpicPupper: also in case he needs to do the actual code changes (not sure who has the right permissions to do so). Vpab15 (talk) 21:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CX Zoom and Vpab15: I've opened a pull request for the code change. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 23:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panwar (caste) to Panwar (surname)

It is shown wrong. Panwar (caste) to Panwar (surname) please fix it TheManishPanwar (talk) 14:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheManishPanwar: Aap jis article ko rename karne ke liye madad maang rahe hain, wo to Panwar rajgharane par tha 16 saal se. Aap usko surname mein kyu badal rahe hain? Agar Panwar ek popular surname hai, to aap alag se "Panwar (surname)" naam ka article bhi bana sakte hai. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • C • L) 14:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You Sir ji TheManishPanwar (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TheManishPanwar: Panwar (surname) ko Panwar (disambiguation) pe hi rehne dijiye. Panwar (disambiguation) mein Panwar naame wale logo ki ek achi si list di hui hai. To surname ke liye alag se article banane ki zaroorat nahi padegi. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • C • L) 15:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:User hak-0 has been nominated for discussion

Category:User hak-0 has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • C • L) 07:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panwar dynasty

Please protect which article semi-protected.Panwar dynasty TheManishPanwar (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheManishPanwar: Main article protect nahi kar sakta. Agar iss article pe bahut zyada vandalism hota hai, to koi aur ise tab protect kar dega. Agar tab bhi protect nahi hota, to tab aap Wikipedia:Requests for page protection par chale jaye. Jo page protect kar sakta hai, vaisa koi kar dega. Par abhi, bahut zyada vandalism hai nahi. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • C • L) 17:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You for Helping TheManishPanwar (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion to move Ukrainian Insurgent Army war against Russian occupation to Ukrainian anti-Soviet resistance movement

I note you had participated in the discussion on the requested move on the Russian information war against Ukraine to Russian–Ukrainian information war. There is currently a similar discussion ongoing at Talk:Ukrainian Insurgent Army war against Russian occupation where your input may be valuable. Kind regards.79.155.36.178 (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No proof that Warner Bros. Feature Animation is the new name for Warner Animation Group.

This makes no sense. There is absolutely no information on the Variety article that Warner Animation Group is going to be renamed to Warner Bros. Feature Animation, as the "Warner Animation Group" is still used today. The Warner Animation Group name and logo are still used. Warner Bros. Feature Animation (1994-2004) is the successor to Warner Animation Group. The Variety article accidentally called it "Warner Bros. Feature Animation" without the information that Warner Animation Group will be renamed. With the case of that studio, it still uses the Warner Animation Group name. Therefore, the information that Warner Animation Group is going to be renamed to Warner Bros. Feature Animation is actually false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorPinas17 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

Hello, CX Zoom. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 12:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated page

Thanks a lot for the heads up about the recreated page. I've checked and was able to carry out a speedy deletion. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 15:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, the user who created the second page appears to have been a sock; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sirspinzalot. Thanks again for brining this to my attention. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Modussiccandi: I did suspect that it is a sock of Sirspinzalot, who !voted in the AfD, but did not have access to the deleted page or it's history to confirm the same. Thanks for doing all that. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Davidson

Thanks for reverting to the correct version of Warren Davidson. When reverting the newest vandalism I didn't notice that unsourced allegations are still in. You've fixed it. Thanks! --RealLifeRobot (talk) 19:34, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the appreciation! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 20:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Hi, I just wanted to let you know I've already opened an SPI. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhantomTech: That's great. Thanks for letting me know. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PhantomTech: I think we did something wrong here. Going by the RM Gangnam style is opposing the RM, the suspected socks are supporting it echoing TheCurrencyGuy. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, I'm dumb. Understood what you're upto. My CPU is sometimes a bit slow. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I didn't come to the conclusion immediately either. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 07:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request Tool changes

Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 15:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quiz generation

Based on the current VPR conversation, what should the quiz be on? I was thinking there should be some question(s) from WP:TFA, since those articles are definitely at a higher standard than ITN / DYK. Sungodtemple (talk) 22:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sungodtemple: Sorry for the late response. Well, I haven't really thought about it. Personally, I'd think of questions from a variety of topics (provided that they're supported by inline sources) and possibly a bonus question from that day's TFA. Thoughts? —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:23, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, which topics precisely? The 'topic selection' process is probably the most difficult one, and I think it would be very prone to bias. What about one question from each of WP:VITAL1 topics? I can't seem to think of anything better. Sungodtemple (talk) 03:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
VITAL1 is too small a list. Wouldn't it be repetitive to have questions come from the same 10 articles every now and then? Further, there are 1 FA & GAs each, and 6 are C-class. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 05:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sungodtemple: Forgot ping. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 05:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How about 5 random WP:GA / WP:FA? Note that just WP:FA I feel is a bit too small of a list and could lead to some issues after say a year of quiz generation.Sungodtemple (talk) 20:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sungodtemple: That should be a good collection to get questions from, I think. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late reply. I'm a bit tired right now, can you create a user subpage or Wikipedia page just for a collection of questions? Sungodtemple (talk) 02:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. representatives from Montana

Template:Current U.S. representatives from Montana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. representatives from Delaware

Template:Current U.S. representatives from Delaware has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe

DYK: Miss Universe Is now a Philippines based organization? I'm not sure where to revert back to on that article. There seems to be a lot of hanky-panky going on with the Miss World/Universe/Earth content. Thanks for opening the sock ticket! I'm tired and signing off for the night. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up the mess. Even I don't know which is the "good version" in these articles. Tbf, I don't know a thing about beauty contests, except that Rachellegeneroso's additions are just hoax. These articles are so heavily vandalised by socks (with different sockmasters) that we also have a WP:GS/PAGEANTS sanctions. But that ain't stopping the vandals yet. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 08:27, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Board of Trustees election

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MB: Thanks for the reminder. Just to let you know, I already voted, not just for NPP but for numerous other reasons. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LTA

[1] he is long term vandal. I had reported on ANI, where I came to know Venkat TL (talk) 06:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Venkat TL. Well, at this point, at Talk:Mamata Banerjee, I have been reverted again but I don't have power to edit war. Plus, not a huge harm is being done by that person, so not sure what to do. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 11:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Revert three times and then ask for temporary semi protection due to sock puppetry. Sorry I forgot the name of this sockmaster. But it is possible to search that ANI thread, if you are interested. Venkat TL (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CSD...?

Just curious, why put this up for deletion? (and why notify PaleoNeonate about it?) I only ask because I was about to revert you, but Liz beat me to it. Thanks - wolf 18:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Thewolfchild: Typically IP users don't (shouldn't) have userpage. That's a reason why default MediaWiki IP signature links to their contributions instead of userpage. Further, the page was created by PaleoNeonate with the text User page creation attempt for IP address user 142.160.131.202 which appeared pretty much a test edit (WP:CSD#G2) Also, the IP talk pages of those who haven't edited in a long time with {{Blanked IP talk}} and removing all content from those pages. In view of all them, I thought it was appropriate to delete that userpage. Now, I think probably not. Will take care of that going ahead. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "typically" IP users don't have (active) user pages but many do, and is there a policy that says they can't or "shouldn't"...? But as you point out, it was PaleoNeonate that activated the page, way back when they were new(er?), five years ago. All that IP user did was redirect their (now active) user page to their talk page, something that many registered users do (myself included), and which is about as benign an action as they could possibly do. In the case of IP user pages, such redirects makes very little difference, since they're not typically used anyway. That said, I just didn't see the need for deletion request or the ping, and was just curious about the reasons. Thanks for the response. - wolf 23:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_29#File:Winterlink_Group.png

Hi @CX Zoom: Thanks for that comment your made at the Rfd on File:Winterlink Group.png redirect, that I was trying to delete. I didn't know that before and thats an important point. At the time I never gave it a thought. :) scope_creepTalk 10:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Sun request

Greetings, CX Zoom! In case you did not see it, I answered your question on the Justin Sun Talk page. Let me know if that source works. Thanks again for taking the time to review my request. Ron at Tron (talk) 20:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ron at Tron: I've done most of it with some input from my side too. I've left a response the article's talk page. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahsa Amini page move

Hi CX Zoom, I'm writing to follow up about your close of the page move discussion while the Mahsa Amini(Jina) AfD was pending, when two participants objected to the move happening while the AfD was pending, and one said "but would also recommend a merge discussion with Death of Mahsa Amini". It is unclear to me how this constitutes what you cited as WP:AVALANCHE & WP:NOTBURO. If you could clarify your reasoning, that would be appreciated. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beccaynr: It is clear that Mahsa Amini(Jina) is a very improper article title and falls short of guidelines at WP:NCPEOPLE. The disambiguation is so improper here that now that it is a redirect, it would be WP:RfD‍able, which I'm holding on until the AfD is complete. For (1) Elli had already moved the article, which I could've reverted, but (2) the consensus on RM was overwhelmingly in support of name change, including Keivan.f. PamD opposed the RM on the grounds that AfD is currently on, and did not oppose on the basis of (de)merits of the proposed name, which was a !vote I did not give much weight to because of this very recent failed RfC that sought to ban moves during AfDs. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 22:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply, CX Zoom. My concerns are 1) there did not appear to be overwhelming support for the move, which also replaces the redirect to the Death of Mahsa Amini, 2) the editor who created the Mahsa Amini(Jina) article and page move discussion had attempted to rename the Death of Mahsa Amini, was reverted, and then the page was protected (this is discussed in the AfD, e.g. [2] ) and 3) the article now named Mahsa Amini appears to be a POV fork. While Mahsa Amini(Jina) is an improper article title, it may have been chosen to evade the page protection implemented by Tamzin, so I have some concerns about this move being made during this AfD, due to the particular circumstances. It may be better to revert the move by Elli and allow the page move discussion to continue after the AfD concludes, if the article is kept instead of deleted or merged. Beccaynr (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I think the RFC: Add Instruction Not to Move discussion does not necessarily support downweighting participants who supported waiting for this AfD to end. This may be an unusual situation, but the RfC outcome appears to encourage flexibility and responsiveness to the particular circumstances, including consideration of participants who suggest waiting for an AfD to conclude. Beccaynr (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Beccaynr: Sorry for the late response. Actually I think all things considered, the move was appropriate. Ofcourse a consensus at AfD will supersede a local RM and it may get deleted, renamed, draftified. I'd like to know what @Elli thinks and if she would vacate her move, I'll reopen and relist the RM. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 05:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, CX Zoom, I appreciate your perspective on this as an uninvolved participant in the AfD, and for considering my perspective. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 06:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Beccaynr: I apologize for not closing the RM when I did the move, that was an oversight on my part. It seemed to me that the RM was opened because the editor who opened it did not have the technical ability to move the page, and not because they thought the move would be controversial. There was no substantive opposition to the move (obviously, because the previous title was blatantly incorrect), and it explicitly is allowed to move articles that are at AfD (and while for more controversial moves it's good to avoid that, this was effectively just fixing a typo). Elli (talk | contribs) 07:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Elli, and one of the things I appreciate about Wikipedia is that it has a lot of self-correcting mechanisms, so one way or another, the underlying issues will get resolved. This does appear to be an obvious move because of the blatantly incorrect title, but may be controversial based in part on the September 2022 discussion on the talk page of the editor who created the article and the page move discussion. However, the AfD will address the larger issue of whether this article should currently exist, and if the article is kept, editors can continue removing unreliable sources and applying NPOV policy. Thank you both for discussing this with me - I am not very familiar with the RM process, so I also appreciate your help with my learning process. Beccaynr (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Padmakshi Renuka jagdamba

Hello, CX Zoom,

Just a reminder, when you move a page, remember to move the talk page, too. If it is an orphaned main space talk page, it can easily be deleted when it should be moved instead. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liz: Thanks for pointing this out. Although I typically take great care to do that, and have myself been de-orphaning old talk/archives for about a week now, I really don't know how this one got left out, because as far as I remember, I had checked the move talk button. I would certainly make sure to double check that everything is properly moved going ahead. Thanks again! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Sun request

Greetings, CX Zoom! In case you did not see it, I answered your question on the Justin Sun Talk page. Let me know if that source works. Thanks again for taking the time to review my request. Ron at Tron (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ron at Tron: I've already made some of the requested changes and responded there. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilded materials

Responsibility accounting 7,197 and control of factory over head, 198; and maintenance cost, 200; basic concepts,198 personal factors in, 198; variance analysis, 204 112.198.69.52 (talk) 13:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear what do you even mean to say here, please elaborate. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 14:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:London public art articles by quality

A tag has been placed on Category:London public art articles by quality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. representatives from North Dakota

Template:Current U.S. representatives from North Dakota has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. representatives from South Dakota

Template:Current U.S. representatives from South Dakota has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. representatives from Wyoming

Template:Current U.S. representatives from Wyoming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Hawaii

Template:Current U.S. senators from Hawaii has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Indiana

Template:Current U.S. senators from Indiana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Louisiana

Template:Current U.S. senators from Louisiana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Maine

Template:Current U.S. senators from Maine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Maryland

Template:Current U.S. senators from Maryland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Massachusetts

Template:Current U.S. senators from Massachusetts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Michigan

Template:Current U.S. senators from Michigan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Minnesota

Template:Current U.S. senators from Minnesota has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Mississippi

Template:Current U.S. senators from Mississippi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Missouri

Template:Current U.S. senators from Missouri has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Montana

Template:Current U.S. senators from Montana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Nebraska

Template:Current U.S. senators from Nebraska has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Nevada

Template:Current U.S. senators from Nevada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from New Hampshire

Template:Current U.S. senators from New Hampshire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from New Jersey

Template:Current U.S. senators from New Jersey has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from New Mexico

Template:Current U.S. senators from New Mexico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from New York

Template:Current U.S. senators from New York has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from North Carolina

Template:Current U.S. senators from North Carolina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from North Dakota

Template:Current U.S. senators from North Dakota has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Ohio

Template:Current U.S. senators from Ohio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Oklahoma

Template:Current U.S. senators from Oklahoma has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Oregon

Template:Current U.S. senators from Oregon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Pennsylvania

Template:Current U.S. senators from Pennsylvania has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Rhode Island

Template:Current U.S. senators from Rhode Island has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from South Carolina

Template:Current U.S. senators from South Carolina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from South Dakota

Template:Current U.S. senators from South Dakota has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Tennessee

Template:Current U.S. senators from Tennessee has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Texas

Template:Current U.S. senators from Texas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Utah

Template:Current U.S. senators from Utah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Vermont

Template:Current U.S. senators from Vermont has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Virginia

Template:Current U.S. senators from Virginia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Washington

Template:Current U.S. senators from Washington has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from West Virginia

Template:Current U.S. senators from West Virginia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Wisconsin

Template:Current U.S. senators from Wisconsin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Wyoming

Template:Current U.S. senators from Wyoming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. senators from Alabama

Template:Current U.S. senators from Alabama has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current U.S. representatives from Alabama

Template:Current U.S. representatives from Alabama has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current members of the United States House of Representatives by state templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Current members of the United States House of Representatives by state templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CX_Zoom/Archives/2022&oldid=1159942113"