User talk:Calliopejen1/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A kitten for you!

Hi, Thank you for the help. I'm friends with Jimmy Lyon and I'll also see if he would list on his Wikipedia page that he went to Marina High. I'll also do some more research on other Notable Alumni. I did have another question. How do I add a text box to the right of the article to add our School Emblem and information about the high school? Thanks and have a great weekend! Ellen H.

Eholmgren (talk) 04:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Eholmgren -- For his Wikipedia page to list that he went to Marina High, there would be the same problem. All Wikipedia pages need to be based on reliable sources, and one Wikipedia page can't be the source for another Wikipedia page. Does he have an official website? I don't see an obvious one. He could list his high school there if so. Another way would be to ask him if he happens to know any press articles about himself that mention his high school. I'll add a partially filled-out "infobox" to the article for you in the next five minutes or so. Happy editing! Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Eholmgren I put up the infobox for you. You can add extra information to it if you know the answers to (and ideally have reliable sources for) any of the blanks. To get a logo in the infobox, you'll first have to upload a file. It's a pretty complicated process but there is a file upload wizard that hopefully can help you jump through all the hoops. Just click "Upload file" in the bar at the left of any page to start. Then, once it's uploaded, specify the filename in the infobox (e.g. | image = Schoollogo.jpg). Let me know if you have any questions. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thank you, again, so much. I'm so new at doing this. I just told my friends about this, so there should be more activity on the page. I'll read up on how to add the logo. Thanks for adding the text box. It probably would have taken me a couple of hours to do! Best of luck to you in all you do! Ellen H. Eholmgren (talk) 05:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

21:15:42, 17 May 2015 review of submission by STwardosz


I added numerous links that go to why this page is notable. The links are from various publishers who have cited this show or episodes of the show. Links include USC Cinema, Filmmaker IQ, Cultural Weekly, No Film School, ScriptMag, and Good in a Room.

STwardosz (talk) 21:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I looked at those links and did not find them to be sufficient. Most are just mentions or are links to show episodes. That is not enough. Also, the USC source is not independent. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Notability of educational institutions?

Daer Calliope,

Thank you for the cookies. I got your message, and also the invitation to the Tea House, but could not quite figure out how to use the latter, so please allow me to contact you directly in this way.

You noted in your review that more evidence was required to underpin the notability of a given entity, and read through the exchanges between you and other users on your talk page. I have come to understand (I think) that membership/ affiliation with a notable body does not automatically confer notability on an institution, right? (e.g. in the Case of a Library, with multiple memberships in organizations that have a Wikipedia entry).

On the other hand, I saw that there were a few entries on High Schools in the US, which would most probably be referenced in newspapers -- can I infer, then, that press coverage is something that would be an index of notability?

Any other leads and comments would be much appreciated. This is the first draft that I have every written, and I am eager to learn. Also, if I edit and resubmit, will you be looking at it again -- in other words, are you 'my' editor that I can work with?

Best, Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.muehlhaeusler (talk • contribs) 09:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Mark.muehlhaeusler WP:GNG is the page that lays out the general notability guidelines that apply to pretty much everything on Wikipedia. The basic yardstick is whether there is significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. That could be "press" coverage, or could be coverage in any other such sources (in the case of an academic library, I'm not sure if the library's collections would be discussed in library-related scholarly journals, for example). I'm not your assigned editor -- if you resubmit, it goes back in the general pool. If you think you have made progress with adding more independent sources, feel free to contact me on my talk page again. If I think it's good enough, I'll approve it. And if I still don't think it's good enough, I'll let someone else review it in case they disagree with me. (win-win!) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Calliopejen1

Dear Calliope, Thanks for the hints, and the kind offer to take another look. After your response, I re-read your original note, and get the sense that the issue at stake is: whether the Library is commonly seen as sufficiently independent from its parent institution to merit separate treatment. I guess that with larger institutions, one can argue both ways ... but for the sake of the draft, I obviously assume that it *is* a topic in its own right. So, I went and gathered some references, which I tried to insert in the right spots throughout the draft. I don't expect to sway your judgement all at once --there are a few more references that I could add--, but wonder if you can tell me if I'm on the right track here. Best, Mark Mark.muehlhaeusler (talk) 11:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Mark.muehlhaeusler, that's somewhat better -- though note that the interview with David Arnold isn't independent given that Arnold is describing his own university's library. Another idea is to look for sources in Arabic (sources need not be in English to be used in Wikipedia). Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

17:59:23, 20 May 2015 review of submission by Ravin9976


How would you recommend i account for the early history of the company from 1925-1990? The one main reference is a book written about the company. I used an amazon reference which I guess is not good. But I think referencing the book is good. Please advise.Ravin9976 (talk) 17:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Ravin9976 (talk) 17:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Ravin9976 -- For now, I would recommend leaving that section out entirely. See what can be written about the company using only secondary sources. Eventually, some content sourced to primary sources could be acceptable (see WP:PSTS). Given that the main problem with the article is that notability has not been established, and primary sources cannot be used to establish notability, I'd just concentrate on getting as much good content from secondary sources as possible. Once you have fleshed it out that way, some content can be added sparingly from primary sources. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thank you.Ravin9976 (talk) 18:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

May 2015

Thanks for telling me info on why you rejected my page. I appreciate the information and I will now do that correctly from now on. :) Emeraldminecart (Talk) 10:18 AM May 20

You're welcome! Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Cathleen Miller

I'm not sure how to fix the "notability" issue on the page I'm trying to create (Cathleen Miller: Author). I've included articles from numerous sources, including a New York Times article. I'd really appreciate a few pointers on how to establish this and make the content sound less like an "advertisement." Thanks. 2602:304:CDC1:CF20:CD15:8141:ED13:A3F1 (talk) 03:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

2602:304:CDC1:CF20:CD15:8141:ED13:A3F1, I think if you cull out the promotional content and sources affiliated with the author (i.e. remove references to her website, her books on amazon, etc., and content sourced thereto), and write the article strictly based on what has been published in high-quality secondary sources, you will make the best case for the notability of this author. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

19:13:54, 21 May 2015 review of submission by Stephanieelle


Hi

I recently wrote an article on Alix Malka/Photographer that was declined. I was wondering if you could inform me as to how to create an article that establishes his Notability.

In my article I listed his cover work with the dates/issue and volume of the magazines, is there a better way to cite these? I have also used sources like the Photo Magazine and Essays written about him for Art Basel, how do I properly cite these?

Any other pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks E.

Stephanieelle (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Stephanieelle -- Generally, you should be citing references about him and his work, not citing his work itself. Right now there are plenty of references to his work, but those primary sources don't help to establish notability. Sources like essays written about him for Art Basel could be helpful to establish notability. You can check out Help:Referencing for beginners to learn how to make footnotes (the videos are the most helpful part of the page IMO). In general, though, formatting of references is not terribly important so long as you include the key facts about the reference -- author, title, date, publication name/volume/number if in a periodical, publisher, ISBN if a book, etc. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Japan Trench Fast Drilling Project (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JMHamo (talk) 06:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

17:22:26, 15 May 2015 review of submission by MMacClark


Submission: Effective Intelligence

Hello. Thank you for your feedback. This is my first wiki submission; I'm still finding my feet.

I had a moment of clarity when I realized that the references should be to third parties. I was stuck in my uni paradigm of footnotes. In this case, my references were to the popular works based on Jerry Rhodes' original research. I have found 3rd party references and will edit accordingly (once I figure out how to edit references).

Re your comment about "not catching on", it's an interesting point. Over 150,000 people around the world have been exposed to the Effective Intelligence model (typically through the Thinking-Intentions Profile), but the online proofs of that are admittedly scarce. Perhaps because the model was originally built for the Philips corporation and not in academe.

Hmmm. May I clarify that you have declined the entry for both reasons? References and "catching on"? I know I can improve the references, but I don't know how to convince you about the models "widespreadness". CAn you suggest something?

Thank you again.

Michael


MMacClark (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

MMacClark -- "Catching on" and references are essentially the same thing. "Catching on" is basically my shorthand for a lot of third-party references discussing the idea. I'm skeptical that enough third-party sources exist in the first place given the citation counts at Google Scholar, but maybe you could prove me wrong. I'd recommend putting together a new list of reliable independent sources (without rewriting the article yet -- if the concept isn't notable I don't want you spending a ton of time writing that is ultimately wasted!) that explicitly discuss Rhodes' concept of "effective intelligence". Then I'd recommend asking me or someone else at Wikipedia:Teahouse for guidance about whether the references show notability. Once you've gotten enough references, then you can work on rewriting the article (probably from scratch) based mainly on what third-party references say, with limited references to Rhodes' work itself. The point of an encyclopedia article is not just to summarize Rhodes' findings but to put them in context -- what have other people said about them? etc. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Calliope.

Many of the articles I list in References are available in PDF format, but behind a purchasing front for the journal in question. Firstly, may I cite something behind a paywall? Secondly, may I cite articles by Jerry Rhodes, himself. Can we assume that, say, the journal "Industrial & Commercial Training" would not publish something they hadn't vetted, effectively proclaiming the article's veracity?

Another question, Is it possible for a concept to be notable while not having many web references? If yes, I'm trying to think of some way to prove that the model and its tools have been used by over 150k people around the world. Hmmm.

In other news, I have updated my citations to independent sources, limited though they are. Should I resubmit the posting, or shall I provide the citations to you in this mode?

Looking at other "profile" instruments on wikipedia... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DISC_assessment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Thinking_Hats https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herrmann_Brain_Dominance_Instrument ...I notice there are citations to the originator's own website and even practitioner's websites. May I use material on the Effective Intelligence http://effectiveintelligence.com/home.aspx as a citation? Or practitioner's?

Thank you for continuing the conversation. I want to get this right, and I appreciate your time. M — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMacClark (talk • contribs) 18:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

MMacClark -- Re paywalled or offline sources, those are fine. Re sources to Rhodes' site/books/etc, those do not help to establish notability so I would omit them almost entirely for now. Works by Rhodes published in journals also do not help to establish notability. (Sometimes if an author has a high h-index it can be an indication of notability, but that standing alone is normally insufficient -- and Rhodes is nowhere near the ballpark we're talking about, i.e. minimum double digits.) If all that exists about effective intelligence is in those very few references you have cited, it is probably not notable and probably does not qualify for a Wikipedia article. I'm not sure investing more time in drafting this article will be worth your while. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Calliope. I guess I'm sure of the subject's notability, notwithstanding the lack of linkable citations. I'm looking at the wiki entry for DISC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DISC_assessment which is likely better known than Effective Intelligence, and yet it contains fewer citations and references, and of lesser independence than the citations and references I'm providing for Effective Intelligence. I don't understand how it warrants a pass, and EI doesn't. I'm not being obstreperous, just looking for clarity. Thanks for continuing the conversation, M. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMacClark (talk • contribs) 17:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Maybe DISC should be deleted too, but no one has gotten around to it yet... Notability is synonymous with editors' ability to provide suitable citations. If what you have cited so far is the best there is, the article is unlikely to be approved, and if approved is likely to be nominated for deletion. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Bird name capitalization

Hello, I saw one of your recent edits, looked at your recent contributions, and see that we are doing similar things. I'm going through groups of birds, right now Charadriiformes, looking for links that redirect through the old capitalization and fixing them using AWB. If you are interested, I'd be willing to share the AWB file that helps me make the corrections. Also I'm wondering if you know anyone else who's working on this, and if there would be any benefit in coordinating; at least not duplicating. Either way, it's good to know someone else is working on the same thing and thank you.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  00:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

SchreiberBike, I'm working intermittently doing the same thing, using the list User:Calliopejen1/Bird caps. I don't know of anyone else working on this, though it's definitely possibe! Would you like to check off what you have done so far so that I don't end up covering the same territory? How exactly are you using AWB to help your review? Just to find targets to fix, and then fixing them mostly manually? Or do you somehow have a script that fixes wrong capitalization throughout an article? I don't know of anyone else doing these sorts of edits.... Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I'll look at your page and see how I can record what I've done there; my notes are less systematic at User:SchreiberBike/Workspace/Bird names. Using AWB, I've set up a list of over 2000 search and replace rules which looks for capitalized species name words and replaces them with lower case. For instance right now I'm working on Great Auk; it finds each instance of "Great" and changes it to "great" and "Auk" to "auk". It would also pick up "Great Britain" and many others, but I've written rules to work around them. It does still pick up "Great Gold Robbery" and turns it into "great gold Robbery" (since "Gold" also has a rule), but it is very easy to undo the automatic changes in AWB before they are saved. I'd guess that it gives more false positives than real corrections, but undoing them is quick, and it catches nearly all of the real problems. I do find new problems to add to the list though, e.g., your correction of "Nothura" that I saw recently. I think it makes me much faster, and I've expanded to try to cover all species' common names. Like any automation, it's got to be used carefully and I've made a few messy errors. If you are interested in trying AWB, I'd be happy to share.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  19:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
SchreiberBike -- sure, I could give it a try. I'm not sure how AWB files are formatted -- is this something you'd share by email? My email is linked at "Email this user". Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
SchreiberBike Another thing I've noticed is that articles that incorrectly capitalize birds also incorrectly capitalize animals and plants. Is this something your script captures, or are you fixing these manually? Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I'm trying to cover all species' common names, but I still do many rarer plants manually. I'll send you an e-mail through the system, then if you reply to my address I'll be able to send you the file. User:Julia W initially send me a file to use in AWB to work on the "List of birds of ..." series where it only needed to pick up the second word in a name and I've expanded it from there.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  20:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
File sent. Since I'm already using an automated tool, I've added some of my other pet peeves to the search and replace list. Most of them are at the top of the list, so they can easily be removed. To exclude false positives, I go through a process where I first rename, for example, "Great Britain" to "G!!reat Britain", then change all the other "Great"s to lower case and then change "G!!reat Britain" back. For that reason, the order of the list has to stay pretty much the same. I suspect there are quirks to the list that I'm not aware of, but I'm happy to answer questions.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  20:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't know how to write things like this, so maybe I'll make a running list of suggested revisions and send it to you periodically for you to incorporate if you'd like. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
That makes sense, but it's not too hard. If you go to "Options"/"Normal settings" you can see all the rules. It's lots of simple rules that all together make something complex. As I've done some more edits this afternoon, I'm seeing that sometimes there are a lot more false positives than real fixes. I hope that doesn't make it too confusing.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I've made a bunch of marks at User:Calliopejen1/Bird caps indicating what I've done. If I've messed up any of your formatting feel free to fix or let me know. As I start on something I'll mark it as "working" and later "done" so we don't overlap. Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  19:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
I can't help it. When you said mammal caps, something like this comes to mind. Keep up the good work.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  23:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

13:03:32, 26 May 2015 review of submission by ENVS6178



Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to review my article Bill C-634: Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights. I wanted to let you know that I will be updating and reviewing my article using your comments but I do not feel that news coverage necessarily dictates notability. Bill C-634 has actually passed the second reading within the Canadian House of Commons which notes that members debated the bills principles and decided that the bill meet the Canadian public needs and that the ideas were sound. This is turn makes the Bill more significant than a "run-of-the-mill legislative proposal going nowhere" as you commented on.

I would argue that where pieces of legislation are considered the process and intent behind them is just as significant as the media coverage they receive. Especially for students of the law, policy and environment within Canada. This is why I will be reviewing my work and resubmitting it soon.

Thank you again for your help and have a wonderful day. ENVS6178 (talk) 13:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

ENVS6178 Please read WP:GNG. Coverage by reliable sources (which in the case of proposed legislation would be newspapers) is the be-all-end-all of notability here on Wikipedia. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

18:23:00, 20 May 2015 review of submission by JenniferTyler1


JenniferTyler1 (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Hello Calliopejen1,

Thank you for your review and critique. I have trimmed the fat of the article to the bare bones that are backed up by the sources. I had composed the article based in part on the subject's LinkedIn bio trimming out the parts that are not supported by the sources.

In the edit I have tried to avoid sounding like an advertisement and have highlighted what is important about the subject. As a music executive, he was the man behind some of the biggest record holding albums and global celebrities (Beyonce') that we know today. As we can see he has also created a successful deal and product with Cohiba Cigars and Jay-Z.

Many of these types of subjects are very silent and do not seek attention, which is why I like and decided to pick such a person. My research has shown me that one would have to be at a very high level within the music business or cannabis industry to come into contact or do business with one of these subjects. For instance, Clive Calder may be the most successful record label owner in the history of music (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clive_Calder) but his Wiki entry is scant when compared to contemporaries David Geffen or Jimmy Iovine. Partly because until he sold to BMG, he did not seek the spotlight and therefore very little written about this powerful man, yet the world knew about the artist he spawned (Will Smith, Britney Spears, N'Sync, The Backstreet Boys, R. Kelly).

I decided to try to encapsulate another important figure before he dies or has reached the lexicon. I believe it is an injustice that only the stories of those who seek the media are being told in Wikipedia. I ask that you please review the changes made and reconsider.

Cheers,

JT

The sources don't support the claims you're making here about Wright's importance. Wikipedia judges notability by coverage in reliable, independent sources and doesn't make special allowances for people who "do not seek attention". I really don't see a valid claim to notability here but leave the final judgment to another reviewer. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your re-edit... I now understand how it should be written. Also, thank you for your impartiality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferTyler1 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

In my research post resubmission, I have come across multiple pages on Wikipedia of artist such as flykingi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flykingi)that have extensive Wiki articles, sketchy sources and have not done .1% that my subject matter has in their given industry. I am asking for clarity as to the standard of significance/criteria for a Wikipedia article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferTyler1 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@JenniferTyler1: I recommend reading WP:OTHERCRAP (why it's not helpful to point to other crappy articles) and WP:GNG (the rules about notability, i.e. who qualifies for an article). Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

04:38:05, 28 May 2015 review of submission by Kunal.v.v


Dear Calliopejen1, this is regarding my article about an Indian Fashion Designer. The subject is notable because she has been there in the industry for a decade now as a quite worker, working away from limelight. All the references made gives impression of notability and being notable. There is very limited references as she been not at all in limelight. some people makes effect and work for society being an unknown that doesn't mean they aren't notable. Kunal.v.v (talk) 04:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Kunal.v.v, Wikipedia judges notability by coverage in reliable sources. A person who is a "quiet worker" and does not receive press coverage simply does not qualify for a Wikipedia article. I see you have resubmitted the article for review without improving the referencing. I can all but guarantee that the next reviewer will decline your article as well. Nayyar needs to first employ a PR person to get some news coverage, and I recommend reworking the article a year or two from now. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Columbian mammoth


The Signpost: 03 June 2015

Ray Whitley

Hi Jen I have raked through the internet with the finest of tooth combs and found several new sources for information about Ray Whitley. A question for you, I have an email from a friend of Whitleys who knows Rays sister. Am I able to use this information or is it strictly only usable if its from a website? One other question I have is hopefully when the article is accepted I need to somehow make a difference between the two people with the same name. I believe it's a Disambiguation but not sure of how to go about it, or if it is myself that does it, or someone in higher control at Wiki. Also I would like to use a picture[1] I have found on the internet but not sure who has the copyright or how to go about aquiring permission. Maybe I'll just hold on a while... Thanks for your help. Tim Artofwork (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Artofwork: It looks like there should be enough there to write an article, though the article may have to be somewhat more bare-bones than what is there already. I'm working on some cleanup now. You can't use a non-published email because of Wikipedia's policies about original research and verifiability. Note that not all sources need to be "from a website" -- e.g. a published book that isn't online could also be a source, or a newspaper article from the 1960s or 1970s that hasn't been digitized. Regarding disambiguation, I can help you with that once the page is live. Finally, re: the picture issue, it's fairly complicated. Given that you have that email, could you contact a member of Whitley's family for a photo? That would be the best method. They would have to release a photo of Whitley under a free license, meaning that anyone (not just Wikipedia) could use it. See this page for more information about media donations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
@Artofwork: Do you have a better source for him being inducted into the Georgia Music Hall of Fame? The problem is I'm not sure how we can tell that it's not the other (more famous) Ray Whitley that was inducted. That 45cat website doesn't look reliable, and the death notice placed by his family isn't a great source either. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
@Artofwork: Nevermind, I found something! Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Jen I appreciate your hard work in untangling the two Rays. I'm sure he can rest in peace now. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artofwork (talk • contribs) 18:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft Article of James A Bushnell

I do not know why the draft is still there because the article has been published for some time now. You can delete the draft then. 50.202.219.2 (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Tim Bergquist

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equisetum californicum has been accepted

Equisetum californicum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Sterling/Winters Page

Hey Jen, can you help me understand why this new page is marked for deletion? I'd appreciate your mentorship. Thanks.

Borntodeal (talk) 21:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

I'd like to delete the Sterling/Winters page so that I can research and prepare content that won't have the deletion notice. What's the process for deleting?

Borntodeal (talk) 03:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

I've moved it back to draft space for you at Draft:The Sterling Winters Company. It's not up for deletion anymore. It cannot stay in draft space indefinitely (by default, pages are deleted after six months), so please try to improve it in the near future. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Kataxu

It's too difficult for me to create an article about Kataxu. I'm french and my english is bad. I prefer drop the article. So much for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Telchar2 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Telchar2 -- if you would prefer to write in French, you can contribute at http://fr.wikipedia.org. You may have the same problems if there are not more reliable sources on this topic, however. Note that (as far as I know) it is fine to use English-language sources for the French Wikipedia. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

CAFAM edit-a-thon canceled

Just wanted to be sure everyone saw the message on this. The Craft and Folk Art Museum canceled due to some issues with their WIFi that we weren't able to get around. I'll try to work something up for July. Sorry about that! At least it's a lovely, sunny day—hope you enjoy it! StaceyEOB (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

5th Annual Wiknic

5th Annual Wiknic (Saturday, July 11, 2015, ~9:30am-4pm)

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You are cordinally invited to the fifth annual Los Angeles Wiknic!

The Wiknic is a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is tentatively planned for Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Saturday, July 11, 2014 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!

I hope to see you there! Howcheng (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Edit summaries, etc

Please use edit summaries. They are helpful, especially where you are deleting without explanation. Here, what you deleted made sense to retain -- as this is also the indicated person's nickname. Thanks. --Epeefleche (talk) 04:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Panama

You're good with excel. Any chance you could use this to generate stubs for all of the Corregimientos of Panama? I asked Acorterion to import this from Spanish wiki.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld, I'll work on this. It may take a little while -- check back with me in a week or so if I haven't replied. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
tThe best way I think would be to put on excel and then get a set format like xxx is a village and corregimiento of xxx Province, Panama. As of 2010 it had a population of ddd, and covered an area of xxxx km2. Then simply start them all feeding off the common data. That could be done fairly quickly I think!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld, The problem is that there isn't a one fact per column format so it will take some manual reformatting to get to a good starting point. And then there are inconsistencies in the data e.g. some have historical population data and some do not, some have provinces and some have comarcas, etc etc. I can get there but it will take a bit of doing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld, I've made a good start. What categories should each of the corregimientos be filed under? Corregimientos of X (either Panama, District, or Province), and that's enough? Should Category:Corregimientos of Panama be broken down by province or district? FYI, there are 631 corregimientos, ~69 districts, and 12 provinces/comarcas. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld -- for your review, a few samples! User:Calliopejen1/Panama QC. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Perfect! I think Category:Corregimientos of xxx Province would work better and then a Category:Populated places by district. I think ones like Miramar, Bocas del Toro should be restarted. We seem to have provincial templates for the corregs anyway.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld -- The first 100 articles are one after the other at User:Calliopejen1/Panama QC. Let me know when you're finished with them so I can put up the next batch for you (it's too big a page size to save all at once). Or let me know if you'd prefer me to send you the Excel file, or whatever. You'll have to start categories (and maybe some navboxes) as you go. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Oh and about the ones that exist currently, some of them are better than what I've got, and some are worse. Most at least have coordinates for the places, which my articles don't have. And be careful with the two comarcas that are at the corregimiento level -- Kuna de Wargandí and Kuna de Madungandí. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
That's great, thanks, will start when I have more energy!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld -- Cool. I see you've done a few. Based on your work, I just redid the articles to include the panama-geo-stub template. I was also thinking of eliminating latm/lats/latNS/longm/longs/longEW (currently blank rows) from the infobox because I normally just use decimal cords pulled from Google maps. Thoughts? I think you'll be doing most of these, and not sure what your standard operating procedure is. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Well you could add {coord missing|Panama} and Anome will take care of that later I suppose. Keep the parameters as they are, I never use decimal in infoboxes. Next month I won't have so many entries for the Intertrans project so I should be able to focus more on that.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld -- Done. BTW before we start on Panama province, we'll need to sort out those entries between Panama and Panama Oeste (a new province that was created after the last census -- see es:Provincia de Panamá Oeste). I'm also looking into whether there's an easy way for me to include interwiki links in my generic articles... will keep you posted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for creating a few of them!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

First batch done. Can you check Kuna de Wargandí, doesn't seem right. It's an independent comarca/province. Is there another one of the same name in Darien Province? Should be separate I'd guess, can you sort it out?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld -- I added a new batch for you. Kuna de Wargandí is actually right -- there are three comarcas that are province-level, and two that are corregimiento-level inside other provinces (including Kuna de Wargandí). Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry I've been rather sidetracked, will try to get the Panama ones finished this week. Finished the last lot, but there still seems to be a missing one in Template:Panama Province . Where are we now, about half way?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't think that's actually a corregimiento. See the Spanish article -- the city (the capital) is a district, and its subdivisions are corregimientos. I think that it's included in the template because it's the capital, not because it's a corregimiento. That happened to me once in Panama Oeste Province. We may want to redirect the link in the template to a combined city/district article like es.wiki has done. We're about 60% done I think -- I'll put some more up a bit later. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld -- New batch ready for creation! Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Will continue tomorrow, just making a start on sorting out the French building stubs. Considering how many departments rather a large task!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Thine Antique Pen created the last batch, next lot :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld, Thine Antique Pen -- just posted a new batch. For these, it looks like we are currently missing the comarca (=province) templates, the articles on many or all districts, and the categories. So that should probably be sorted before or at the same time as posting these articles! Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Co-op Pilot Results & Mentoring

Hey there! The Co-op has been on a hiatus for a bit, but we are planning on opening up shop again soon. When you're able, please read over and respond to this update on our talk page. We have favorable results from our final report regarding the pilot, and we are interested in seeing who is available to mentor when we reopen our space and begin to send out invites again. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

This message was sent by I JethroBT (talk · contribs) via Mass Message. (Opt-out instructions)

Proposed deletion of Construction methods for private pools

The article Construction methods for private pools has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a 'how to' and ostensibly art spam for a pool construction company (links). See: WP:NOTADVICE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

Hi. I'm probably in the dummies category but I'm doing my best to edit an article on the First Robot Olympics that took place in Glasgow in 1990 (it's in Guinness book of records etc etc). I started the piece a year ago and put in a lot of work a year ago to get an initial draft and was then waiting for input from others to contribute. Then, after six months I was told if it didn't get completed it would get deleted. I requested it to get put back but when it was all the content had disappeared. Bit demoralised. You just sent a message saying that by now empty document will be deleted. Please, please, if there is any way of getting back the original document I promise to get it finished quickly and to get input from the dozens of robot builders (US, Japan, Russia, India .....) who competed at the time. Any help, guidance etc would be GREATLY appreciated. Many thanks, Peter MowforthPetermowforth (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

DC Current (MLU)

I am new to (attempting, all attempts have failed) creating Wikipedia pages. Why would you leave me a message at the same time you deleted my page, rather than before doing so? It does not give me an opportunity to do anything about it such as update or submit the page. --DarrenShultz (talk) 17:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikinic rescheduled

5th Annual Wiknic rescheduled to Saturday, July 25, 2015, ~9:30am-4pm

Due to a conflict with the Redondo Loves Wikipedia edit-a-thon, the fifth annual Los Angeles Wiknic has been rescheduled. As before, the location will be at Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Saturday, July 25, 2015 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!

I hope to see you there! —howcheng {chat} - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


Mickey Thomas Terry

Thank you for sending the warning that my page is up for deletion. However could you guide me so I can make all necessary changes and have this article move into the mainspace? Stltigga (talk) 03:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


The Signpost: 08 July 2015

This is a test message. --Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:49, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

You're invited to the Ally Skills Workshop at Wikimania!

You were suggested as someone who might be interested in the Ally Skills Training Workshop at Wikimania! The workshop is designed to train Wikipedia admins to be more aware of sexism and is funded by an Inspire grant. The workshop will focus on teaching specific skills and techniques directly relevant to Wikipedia admins and editors, and in particular will teach people about the psychology of trolls. The workshop will be on Thursday July 16 from 2pm to 5pm in Don Diego 3.

If you are attending Wikimania, you are invited to apply to the Ally Skills Workshop! Space is limited and we may not be able to accept all applications, so apply now. More information, including a link to the application form, is here:

Ally Skills Workshop description and application form

People of all genders are welcome to attend. Unfortunately, travel scholarships for Wikimania are already closed and we don't know of any other sources of travel funding. If you know anyone else attending Wikimania who might be interested in attending this workshop, please encourage them to apply!

Thank you for your time,

Valerie Aurora (Instructor and Interim Executive Director of the Ada Initiative)

Valerietai (talk) 22:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Hi Calliopejen, I didn't realize you were going to Wikimania and if you are, I look forward to meeting you there. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:AfC postpone G13

I see you're doing a lot of Template:AfC postpone G13 but remember that the template should be included as {{AfC postpone G13|1}} so that it shows up at Category:AfC postponed G13 with the number of post-postponements and not just {. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Ricky81682 -- Sorry, can you give me an example of what you're talking about? For 99% of what I'm doing, I use the AFC helper script. So I just press the "postpone" button and it does the rest... Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Seems like the helper script should be working like this rather than how it's currently done. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Theopolisme -- I think you're who would look into this? Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script instead. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

JC's Girls

Hi Jen,

Might you have time to review an article I currently have up for featured status? It's called JC's Girls. The reviewers who have contributed to the FAC so far seem sharply divided, and, because the FAC has been open for so long, I am concerned that it is going to close as "no consensus". I would greatly appreciate your thoughts.

Neelix (talk) 15:20, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

I may be able to return to this later, but I started reading and got bored because evangelism is probably one of my least favorite topics to read about. One comment I have is that the "ideology" section (and perhaps other bits of the article) seems a little "in-universe" -- e.g. "JC's Girls connects female sex workers with churches the organization believes to be non-judgmental,[5] hoping that the women will experience the love of Christ through these churches". This is written as though "the love of Christ" is a thing that uncontroversially exists in the world. Overall, it doesn't seem too bad, and I might be able to lend my support but I'd have to set aside some time later to come back to it and think about it more thoroughly. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, Calliopejen1. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Bananasoldier (talk) 21:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Calliopegen1! Our WikiProject runs weekly collaborations. I hope you might be interested in seeing what we have to offer. Regardless, thank you for all of your contributions to WP! Bananasoldier (talk) 21:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Request for help

Hi User:Calliopejen1. I am looking for some help setting up an event page for the upcoming editathon I'm planning (November 4). Clearly my wikipedia community and editing skills are not up to my organizational skills. If you are still serving as a mentor, I could use some general help. Thanks LLRungegordon (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@LLRungegordon: -- Sure, I'd be happy to help. Do you have a page somewhere with the event information for me to start from? Time, date, place, theme of editathon, suggested worklist, etc.? Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I just created it. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Aphra_Behn_Society_Editathon LLRungegordon (talk) 21:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
LLRungegordon -- My first basic question: Why did you create this page at Mediawiki? (I.e. was it a conscious choice to put it there vs. English Wikipedia?) It would likely make sense to put the page on en.wikipedia if you are expecting generally English-speakers editing English Wikipedia. Then when people sign it their RSVPs will be linked to their en.wikipedia userpages. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
And this is why I need help. I was attaching the event page to Wiki-meetup, and I wasn't aware of the difference between Mediawiki until I tried to link to Wikipedia articles. Also the Inspire grant site is on MediaWiki, and they asked for a "target site" which I thought meant a wiki page for the event, but maybe not? Sigh. I should create a new page on English Wikipedia. Is that standard operating procedure for editathons? All the links for advice on how to organize the editathons have proven very unhelpful. I get the sense that Wikipedia and all its organization (like Wiki Education) are developing so rapidly that there isn't a general introduction for the newbie available to orient herself. That's what I really need. thanks for any help you can give.LLRungegordon (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Varanasi

Finally at Good article review. Any assistance in responding to the review would be appreciated. Where are we on the Panama stubs? I thought I left it to Thine to complete.♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld -- Hmm. Maybe I'll be able to help. If I recall from when I was working on it, much of my work (which I thought was much better than what existed -- good sourcing etc.) was quickly removed by others, so I'm not sure I care to invest much time in that article. Re Panama, I posted more stubs here and it has kind of stalled. Now we are just needing to finish up the comarcas. They don't have templates yet, though, so those likely need to be created before the stubs can be. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about the stalling, I though Thine Antique Pen was finishing them off. I guess I'll do the remainder myself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Bummer, seems acceder.buenosaires.gov.ar has been taken down. Can you find if it it's been moved domains or something? It had a massive amount of images for Argentine films and actors. I was trying to look for more images of María Teresa Ferrari, currently at GAR.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

@We hope: Might be of further help.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld:. I had a look at the Cultura website and got no results with a search. Did a check of the site as a cached page; it was up and running as of the end of July, (most recent crawl) so they may be moving servers or something like this. Would say keep your bookmark and check back after a while. If they have moved the information, they may not yet have gotten around to redirecting the URL. We hope (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

Thanks

Hello again. I'll wait until the time arrived for one of the mentors to help me.

Meanwhile how can i offer help to other users who need to create userboxes as I did to others. And am I allowed to help other users who asked my help without your - permission?

Thank you very much, i want to be one of you guys so that i can help to improve wikipedia. But first things first!

Ras Benjih (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

@Ras Benjih: You don't need my permission to do anything here -- my job is just to give helpful advice. I'm not sure that there is a high demand for help creating userboxes, but I recommend (1) adding your name to the list of members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Userboxes/Members to join the userboxes wikiproject and (2) posting a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Userboxes saying that you'd like to help anyone that needs help creating a userbox. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Draft:Richard Pick (musician) (G13: Abandoned AfC submission

Dear Calliopejen1, In September 2014 I was in the process of creating a page for Mr. Richard S. Pick (musician) who made a very large contribution to the study of Classical Guitar. I was having some trouble with the documenting process of Mr. Pick's many publications and then was sidetracked by my job responsibilities, thus setting aside the draft for later returning and publishing it. I have since done more research, have traveled and met with some of Mr. Pick's former students from Depaul University (Chicago) who provided me with some additional background and detail for the article. I see now that my original article has been deleted and understand that there are procedures for bringing it back for further editing and backup material. I am hoping that I can request your guidance in getting me back to this project in an orderly, acceptable fashion. You help would be greatly appreciated. Thank You Horse Attack Mark (talk) 10:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

@Horse Attack Mark: I restored the page for you. Please note that there is still a need for published, reliable sources (see WP:GNG) so if you are unable to add them, the article will likely be deleted again. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Spade Cooley

Copy of question and reply on my talk page.

Why did you revert my edit? Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

There was no option when I did the revert, or I would have stated that, although I appreciate the effort you put into finding that image, it is no where near as good as the one you replaced. It pretty much makes Cooley look like a goofball, is cluttered with parts of whatever the whole was being used to portray, and is basically a head shot pasted on a cartoonish image. Perhaps that page from Billboard could be used to demonstrate Cooley's popularity somewhere else in the article. Cooley was an important figure in his prime, and the up front image of him should reflect that.Steve Pastor (talk) 22:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trimble 3D Warehouse

The article Trimble 3D Warehouse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

St. Louis Jain temple

You wrote:

(unsourced, and no jains in the united states claim seems somewhat dubious (how would you even begin to verify if this was true? 1900 census at least indicates a number of people with last name "jain"))

1. I saw http://www.censusrecords.com/Search?LastName=jain&CensusYear=1900 There is apparently a last name of European origin with the same spelling. None of the individuals in the 1900 census have any connection with India. Also note that the custom of using "Jain" as the last name by some of the Jains in India became common only in 20th century.

2. Books and articles explicitly mention the first Jain settlers arriving in 1944 (Jains in India and Abroad, Prakas C. jain, ISJS, 2011, see p. 99). I have seen the names of the families somewhere.

Malaiya (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of public art in São Paulo has been accepted

List of public art in São Paulo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elmer Wachtel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Gabriel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

08:11:38, 20 October 2015 review of submission by Cinemaclosed


Hi there Calliopejen1, I'm just wondering why this article was declined when the one relating to David Quinn (artist) from Mayo wasn't. There are no references on that page. Kind regards, Cinemaclosed Cinemaclosed (talk) 08:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC

please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Perhaps that article should be deleted but no one has gotten to it yet. better to compare your article to the criteria than to other articles. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

05:47:23, 20 October 2015 review of submission by Thillerbrand


Hello Calliopejen1, as you can see, I am pretty new to Wikipedia, so perhaps I need some help :-). You rejected the article because of missing reliable references, if I understood correctly. Well, Andy is referenced on the Wikipedia article of sweet, so should I reference this article into his page? Would that be enough? Would it be also ok, if I add some more references to the record, he published with his band? Regards Thomas Thillerbrand (talk) 05:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

No, citing another Wikipedia page is not useful (WP is not a reliable source). Re citations discussing his work with the band, those probably won't be helpful either-- see the note after #12 of Criteria for musicians and ensembles at WP:MUSIC. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

07:34:43, 22 October 2015 review of submission by Ifr ko


Hi Calliopejen1, I have concerns regarding the Admiral Markets article which was declined for lack of reliable sources. I have looked at other articles in the same industry and mentioned the sources accordingly. So it seems a bit unclear as to which sources are not reliable. It would be very helpful if you could please point out which sources needs to be changed so that I can fix those. I will be eagerly waiting for your reply. Thanks.

I declined the article for lack of notability. If the only attention the company has garnered in third party sources is four articles at financemagnates.com and one article at leaprate.com, I don't think the company is significant enough for a Wikipedia article. I would recommend reading WP:OTHERSTUFF because sometimes other Wikipedia articles are poor models. If you disagree with my assessment, I would recommend posting at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Finance or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business to get a second opinion. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Taxco el Viejo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Taxco el Viejo, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://maps.thefullwiki.org/Taxco.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taxco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Universal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Article on Vidal Pego

Hi, first of all, thanks for trying to bring this article (Draft:Manuel Antonio Vidal Pego) to the attention of a larger audience. Unfortunately, I can't find it on the noticeboard anymore. What type of feedback was received? Thanks, Fraenir (talk) 04:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

@Fraenir: See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive230#Draft:Manuel_Antonio_Vidal_Pego -- no one responded, unfortunately... Might make sense to repost? Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

09:32:20, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Epg2015


I am unsure what needs to be done for the article to be accepted. Please could you be more specific about what needs to be changed?

Epg2015 (talk) 09:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

@Epg2015: To be frank, I'm not sure this organization qualifies for an article (no matter how it is written) -- see WP:ORG and WP:GNG. But if you would like to keep trying, I would recommend finding only the highest-quality five sources about the organization and removing all other sources/references from the article. The best sources = sources that are independent of the organization and discuss it in some depth (typically this would be newspaper articles). Then rewrite the article using ONLY what those sources can support. Delete all content referenced to the organization's own website and to sources affiliated with the organization. Please also read WP:PSCOI if you are affiliated with the organization (disclosure of your affiliation would be required if applicable). Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Duplicate

Thank you for approving the article. It said it would be several weeks to be approved, so I made one too by accident, but with a slightly different name (TV series). Can you erase it? Also, do you know why my first edits were "not constructive"? I fixed some typos and they got changed back. I asked that person but they did not answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YL4604 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

@YL4604: I fixed the duplicate articles. Re the not constructive notice, maybe that editor was referring to this edit? I think it was probably a mistake that this got saved. I'll check and make sure the typos you spotted get fixed again if your fixes were undone. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so for volcanos/volcanoes both are correct, I left it as the original. For "well established black community" there should be a hyphen so I added it back. I think the user who reviewed your edits was a little too fast to call them vandalism/testing -- but I wouldn't take it personally, sometimes things like this happen here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black-and-tan faction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reconstruction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

Proposed deletion of Splay (Japanese band)

The article Splay (Japanese band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMG, looking at the webpage in Japanese has only primary external links, while the French wiki has nothing in terms of sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Japan Trench Fast Drilling Project has been accepted

Japan Trench Fast Drilling Project, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 18:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Great Historian you're! Just came across this you started. Best. →Enock4seth (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Caesars

Hi, can you upload this?♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: see File:Caesars Palace from nearby hotel (2).jpg. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Cheers for that!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

So sorry about the Panamanian articles, I thought Thine Antique Pen completed them all. If I'd know I'd have finished them off. We should finish them off asap!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Stats for MENA and AR wiki

Hi! Hope this finds you well. I saw you were one of the editorss who contributed to this page here so I figured out that maybe you can help find up-to-date statistics for MENA and AR Wiki. Specifically, I'm looking for the number of edits coming from each MENA country to the AR Wikipedia. Thanks!--Reem Al-Kashif (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@Reem Al-Kashif: Sorry, no idea! It looks like the only user that has contributed to the page substantively is on an indefinite break, but you could try emailing him.[2] Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
@Calliopejen1: Thanks a lot for your reply. Will do email him. edit: Sorry, do you know where is his email? Can't find it on his Meta page :$--Reem Al-Kashif (talk) 11:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

Season's Greetings!

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Speedy deletion nomination of Human trafficking in Gabon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Human trafficking in Gabon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2010/142760.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WormTT(talk) 14:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

Nomination for deletion of Template:Country study

Template:Country study has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —PC-XT+ 08:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chiamatemi Francesco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Interested in fixing fashion articles

Hi Jen, congrats on the new baby! I'm going to try to edit some more fashion articles to help improve the WikiProject Fashion coverage and saw you were involved there. Hope all's well! -- Fuzheado | Talk 21:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!! I haven't been active with fashion articles lately, but they're pretty much all a disaster. The first one I picked at random Valentino (fashion designer) would be a great candidate for improvement with better sourcing and an eye toward making it a more coherent biography. Let me know if you need more ideas for articles to work on or help with anything! I'm not always checking Wikipedia so may not answer quickly though! Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

Wik-Ed Women Session #5

Wik-Ed Women Session #5

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

I would like to personally invite you to the March edition of the Wik-Ed Women meetup, which will take place on March 15, from 6-10 in the evening. It will occur at Los Angeles Contemporary Archive, 2245 E Washington Blvd, Los Angeles, California 90021 (downtown LA -- map). The building has a pink top with old signage for American Accessories, Inc. dba Princess Accessories (Photos [PDF]). There is on-site parking in the back, which also has an entrance. If you cannot attend in person, you are more than willing to work remotely, as we appreciate all help that you can provide. Finally, here is a link to the Facebook event, in case you want to invite friends, as we are always looking for new editors to help expand coverage of women on Wikipedia!

I hope to see you there! Cosmicphantom (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

A reminder

I'm sure you've not forgotten but the WP:Awaken the Dragon contest starts in 4 and a half hours time. I wish you the best of luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rats in Boston concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rats in Boston, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Emily Ratajkowski

In the past you have been active at WP:FASHION, which seems to be inactive. I am trying to get the model Emily Ratajkowski promoted to WP:FA in time to be considered for WP:TFA for her 25th birthday. Although I know you are not as active as you once where, it would be great if you could get involved at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive3 and in her article directly. Let me know if you are interested.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Files for discussion

Thanks for helping to reduce the backlog in that forum. FFD does not see much admin activity so your work of the past two days is deeply appreciated.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Deleted image without summary

You deleted File:Norton Wankel air induction cooling.JPG at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 29 where the discussion was two editors in favour of keeping versus two regular image volunteers against. There was no summary closure. Did you actually look and read through? I can see you are using a bulk-listing tool, but there is no entry for timestamp 20:39 in your worklist. Is this a double server-lag instance? Thanks.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

I did read through. I'm not using any special tool for deletions (I just pressed delete). I'll write a close rationale now. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I've adopted of late a new directive in becoming a 'better editor' by finding reasons not to delete, instead trying to improve, so I still think this technical deletion is a retrograde move that worsens the reader experience.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 20:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Turkish images

I'm sorry: I misunderstood the situation. Please expand your rationale for deletion with the statement given at my talk page; once you've done that, I'll un-close the nominations, or you can feel free to un-close it yourself. I'll restore the deletion tags on the images if you've not already. Nyttend (talk) 02:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

PUF closed

WP:PUF has been closed. Could you please move all of your nominations at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 April 22 to WP:FFD and tag that page with {{db-g7}}? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 13:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

GeoffreyT2000 All discussions have been copied to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 23 with the PUF tags removed, the uploader re-notified, the PUF page deleted and the PUF category deleted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I wasn't aware. The image listing script should be changed -- I'll talk to the user who made it. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 26#File:Epoth Biosyth.gif

Hi Calliopejen1. What about File:Epoth Biosyth II.gif mentioned there? --Leyo 15:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Done. Sorry, didn't understand that was an additional nomination. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Uitsig_Camp_Building.jpg

Hi Calliopejen

This image is South African and was originally used on a page for a city called Welkom in South Africa.. South African copyright specifies rights only for 50 years from original publication; or 50 years from creation if unpublished (collective work, anonymous or pseudonymous work, audiovisual work, posthumous work) 50 years from creation (photographs or the work of applied art. The original image is circa 1940, therefore it is deemed in general public use. South African Copyright Act of 1978. P.S. I travel a lot and may not always have access to the internet. I do find it a bit unfair that the time frames are so short for people to respond to, or that the person who is asking for more details does not fully clarify their issue. I see that you are American and I urge you to understand that different countries have their own distinctive specifications to copyright. Kind regards.

@Caracal Rooikat: The issue is that everything uploaded to Wikipedia must be public domain in the US, because Wikipedia's servers are in the US. Because of some unusual and arbitrary legislation in the US, works have to be public domain in their home country as of 1996 to be public domain in the US. So we have to count back the 50 years from 1996, not from the present day. So that is 1946, and this image might or might not qualify. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
@Calliopejen: Well then in that case I dont know how to proceed?? I dont think this information on where Wikipedia's servers are situated and the implications you are suggesting has ever been clear to users from the rest of the planet. I would urge someone, anyone to place some clearer signage up in this regard. ??????????????????
@Caracal Rooikat: The relevant signage is on the copyright templates, e.g. {{PD-South-Africa}} -- making clear that it has to be PD in the US too. (Whoever uploaded this tagged it with the PD-URAA tag which isn't accurate because it may not have been public domain in 1996 -- which is what that tag is about.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Help with removing error from Fire article

For reference 17 on this article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire

This error is listed in the references at the bottom of the page, about the tag/name Bowman2009 being defined multiple times with different content, I've searched through the article and can't find the error in the text so it can be removed, can you help with fixing this error in this article? Thanks, here's the error:

Bowman, D. M. J. S.; Balch, J. K.; Artaxo, P.; Bond, W. J.; Carlson, J. M.; Cochrane, M. A.; d'Antonio, C. M.; Defries, R. S.; Doyle, J. C.; Harrison, S. P.; Johnston, F. H.; Keeley, J. E.; Krawchuk, M. A.; Kull, C. A.; Marston, J. B.; Moritz, M. A.; Prentice, I. C.; Roos, C. I.; Scott, A. C.; Swetnam, T. W.; Van Der Werf, G. R.; Pyne, S. J. (2009). "Fire in the Earth system". Science 324 (5926): 481–4. Bibcode:2009Sci...324..481B. doi:10.1126/science.1163886. PMID 19390038. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Bowman2009" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Neptune's Trident (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

@Neptune's Trident: I fixed it for you. The page was transcluding Template:Origin of fire which is apparently reused in multiple articles. That bit of text had Bowman2009 defined differently. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:African-American Civil Rights Movement

Template:African-American Civil Rights Movement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Sandstein  21:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Files for discussion: Australia's map

Hi Calliopejen1:

Regarding your emails concerning low resolution files that I uploaded a long time ago. You can delete these files. Best wishes --Sniedo (talk) 05:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Moving content around

Remember when moving content to say were you moved it from such as in this edit[3] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@Doc James: Yeah, I realized just after clicking save (which is why there is this edit one minute later). Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Perfect thanks :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Beaded listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beaded. Since you had some involvement with the Beaded redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daran Kravanh has been accepted

Daran Kravanh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

Hi there. I've started a new initiative, the Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. It's a long term goal to bring about 10,000 article improvements to the UK and Ireland. Through two contests involving just six or seven weeks of editing so far we've produced over 1500 improvements. Long term if we have more people chipping it and adding articles they've edited independently as well from all areas of the UK then reaching that target is all possible. I think it would be an amazing achievement to see 10,000 article improvements by editors chipping in. If you support this and think you might want to contribute towards this long term please sign up in the Contributors section. No obligations, just post work on anything you feel like whenever you want, though try to avoid basic stubs if possible as we're trying to reduce the overall stub count and improve general comprehension and quality. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lake Urana Nature Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red gum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

A user is trying to change the placement of expand language templates without consensus

Dear Calliopejen1, another user, User:Ettrig has been single handedly trying to relocate the expand language templates to the bottom of pages across multiple pages against the consensus[4], having already begun the process, a few examples shown here[5][6][7][8], and is continuously trying to force this new guideline onto the howto template[9] which is transcluded on the documentation on all the expand templates. I have suggested that things should remain at status quo ante until a proper discussion is started, but he continues to revert to his version, I am contacting you because you have the most experience with past discussions and conflicts related to these templates and could perhaps mediate this issue. — Abrahamic Faiths (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Calliopejen1. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. You helped out with my Environmental Law class a couple of years ago where I had a wikipedia assignment. It was very helpful for the students to get feedback from members of the community. I'm wondering if you'd be willing to do the same this semester? As a reminder, it is a Master's level course in Environmental Science at the University of San Francisco and the students (who are mainly working professionals), in teams of two, will be asked to write a new article. The articles would start in their sandboxes early to mid November and then go live by the third week in November. Any help is greatly appreciated and just having them know that there are wikipedians (and lawyers) out there that will be looking at their work adds a level of meaning to their work. Let me know and, in any case, thanks for your help in the past. Aarf613 (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge

It's up :-) Sign up and help spread the word!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Calliopejen1.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help

Hi Calliopejen1,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Calliopejen1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Environmental Law Student Articles

Hi Calliopejen1,

You were the online ambassador for my Environmental Law course a couple of years ago. I am teaching it again this semester and was wondering if you would be willing to take a look at some of my student's articles? They have just gone live and we'll be meeting to talk about them this Saturday. It is really useful for them to know that there are Wikipedia editors out there paying attention to what they are doing.

The articles can be found here. In any case, many thanks for all your help in the past. Aaron Aarf613 (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

I'll leave a few notes on the talk pages as I'm able! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Hey Calliopejen1, thanks so much for all the comments on the student articles in my environmental law class!!! Aarf613 (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Request for Comments on use of certain files not copyrighted in the US

Hello,

There is an ongoing discussion about the use of files on Wikipedia that are not protected by copyright in the US because there is no copyright relations between the US and the country of publication. You commented in a 2012 discussion on the same topic that resulted in no consensus. You are invited to share your views in the ongoing discussion. AHeneen (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

February 18 Wikipedia Day event in DTLA

LA Wikipedia Day Celebration (February 18)

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

Please join us at our Wikipedia Day celebration at the Ace Hotel in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, February 18, 2017 from 11 am to 5 pm! This event will feature lectures, panel discussions, lightning talks, open space discussions and collaboration, and--most importantly--cake! Please RSVP on the event page if you're thinking of joining us.

I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Kelp noodles

An article that you have been involved in editing—Kelp noodles—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MaeveCosgrave (talk) 10:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! (Way Beyond Thank You!)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for everything you did to make Wikpedia Day/LA 2017 a success! JSFarman (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
You're welcome! And thank you for organizing!! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

So glad to finally meet you at Wikipedia Day 16 LA! Rosiestep (talk) 03:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Likewise! And thanks for your awesome presentation! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PD-Afghanistan

Template:PD-Afghanistan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Transreq

Template:Transreq has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KMF (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

10 years of editing, today.

Hey, Calliopejen1. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Calliopejen1/Archive 12,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: Thanks! It's actually more like the anniversary of when I lost my password as User:Calliopejen and had to start over! :) But glad to have been around so long regardless. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

i found out that you have made great changes in artice Internet in Azerbaijan.So i started to translate it i decided to thank you for writing the article Aykhan463 (talk) 09:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Military equipment of Yemen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Military equipment of Yemen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military equipment of Yemen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I have the license of my content I created on Teachers' Resource Centre as prior notice. Kindly bring the page back ASAP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aftab222000 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Hey Don't warn me about what em doing, also my article is on review not in publishing process and you delete it without any comment on it. This is not fair and you wasted my efforts.Aftab222000 (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 22:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for save me wasting my time and deleted my efforts. I will go through the process and publish my article ASAP. “The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.” Good luck and Bye. Aftab222000 (talk • contribs)Syed Muhammad Aftab 23:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Joe B. Jackson

The entry for Joe B. Jackson, which you cite as copyright infringement based on http://www.claybourn.org/mary-e-clayborn.html, uses some text from website which I own, created, and run. The text is used with my full and complete permission. To help make it even clearer for you, I will remove the copyright footer from the Claybourn.org page later this evening. Any claims to copyright for that material is fully permitted and released, so there is no copyright violation. As for past allegations of violations from User:Diannaa, you'll find that her concerns were the exact same -- erroneous claims that my previously authorized material was used in violation, when in fact it had my full permission. To help make things clearer for Diannaa, the footer was removed there as well and the matter was resolved.--YHoshua (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

There's a couple of ways you can get this resolved. There's full instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted materials and a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Reverted recent deletion from article on Consumer behaviour

You recently reverted two long passages from an article on Consumer behaviour. Your reversion was accompanied by the edit summary "remove content added by User:Grochim that was probably copied from a printed source. do not restore without rewriting from scratch." The use of the term "probably" suggests that you are uncertain about the content's origin. I do not think that it is appropriate to delete content based on a hunch or a speculation. I have performed a basic search for this content using Google, and it does not come up in sources, other than those who are copying the Wikipedia' content (such as Coursehero.com and Wikivisually. This suggests that the relevant content was actually developed by a Wikipedia user. I have worked extensively on this article, and when I see content that I suspect to be cut and paste, I either report it (for lengthy sections) or paraphrase it. In all the time I was working on this article, I never had a problem with the passages you reverted as they are very general in charater and refer to the black box concept which is well-known and canvassed in virtually every introductory marketing/consumer behaviour text-book. Accordingly, I have reverted your reversion. BronHiggs (talk) 21:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

@BronHiggs: Some of the content added by Grochim was in fact copied from the printed source cited, which I should have mentioned. And there is a good chance that the remainder of the content was copied. In virtually every instance where we have been able to compare his contributions against the source text, they were copied verbatim or essentially verbatim. (And he usually worked from printed sources, not from websites -- so searching for the content in Google will not necessarily reveal the copyright violation.) It looks like you didn't actually restore the content, but I feel strongly that the content should not be restored. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
One other comment: even though the concept may be very general, it would still be inappropriate to use another author's previously published explanation of the concept here, as I'm sure you understand. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
@Calliopejen1: You are still alluding to a published source, but not naming it. I think users should be given the benefit of the doubt. To make an allegation of plagiarism is a very serious matter. If you have evidence that it has been plagiarised, then this should be noted - either in the edit summary or on the talk page. But is is not appropriate to make these types of allegations without producing evidence nor to qualify these types of assertions with "probably". If my previous attempt to revert the content was unsuccessful, I will try again. BronHiggs (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
@BronHiggs: It is the source cited in the text itself that is copied! See here. And you can see the user's extensive history of copying at this link and in the discussions on his talk page. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
@BronHiggs: On second thought, I have changed my mind. Though some of the original edit was in fact copied verbatim from that source, the content that remains has either been transformed or was so littered with typos to begin with that I think it was Grochim's original contribution. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
@Calliopejen1: Noted, with thanks. BronHiggs (talk) 03:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

I think I understand how you helped me on the side effects of penicillin, but I am still not sure what I did wrong and how not to do it again. I have been having difficulties in referencing govt. sources. Sometimes I tend to leave a whole trail of wreckage behind me when I am deep into developing content. If it weren't for editors like you to help correct my blunders I surely would have been blocked by now. I am especially grateful for your total rewording of the content.

The Very Best of Regards,
Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 19:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC), Barbara Page

@Barbara (WVS): This issue is a little tricky because the content came from a government website (which says that it is public domain) but here the government is actually hosting content created by a third-party. Though the government approves (and has input into) drug labels, the copyright for those labels belongs to the drug companies. I know something about the label-writing process from outside Wikipedia. Anyways, it's just a matter of thinking whether content hosted at a government webpage was actually created by the government. Generally it is, so there is no problem--but this was an exception. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Is it okay for me to contact you if I have a future question on this?
Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 19:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Calliopejen1. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers.
Message added 03:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File PROD implemented

Hello. Per this year's RfC at WT:PROD, the consensus agreed to apply WP:PROD to files. Feel free to add {{subst:prod}} manually. Alternatively, you can use Twinkle and select "PROD" at any "File:" page. --George Ho (talk) 03:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Contribution to a CopyVio Investigation that was closed five months ago

It is unclear why you felt the need to comment on a copvio investigation that was concluded five months ago. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2016_November_20#20_November_2016) Just to clarify, the discussion in the copyvio complaint proceeded as follows:

1. I placed a copyvio notice on the article, History of marketing, on 18 November, 2016.
2. An unknown editor appears to have removed that notice on or around 19 November, 2016.
3. On 20 November, 2016 I reinstated the copyvio notice.
4. The allegation was investigated by an administrator and on the 13 February, 2017 the outcome was posted. The admin found that the content in question was "backwards copy" (i.e. the source in question had copied the relevant content from wikipedia and not the other way around) and that there was "no cause for concern.
5. After the initial investigation concluded, the copyvio notice should have been removed at this juncture.
6. On 26 March, 2017, a different administrator, who incidentially is a WP editor in residence specialising in identifying plagiarism, cleaned up the content in question by paraphrasing it and noted that there was "no remaining infringement"
7. That should have been the end of the investigation and the application of any solutions as required.
8. Two months after the content was cleaned, and five months after the investigation was concluded, you decide to add to the discussion by noting that something, probably the copyvio notice, was "apparently removed by Bronhiggs [me]." [From the context, it is not entirely clear whether you are alleging that I removed the content or the copyvio notice]

Are you trying to intimate that I removed the copyvio notice before the investigation reached a decision? Do you have the diffs to show when and who removed the notice? If so, why not include them in your commentary? I do not understand why it matters who removed the copyvio notice in relation to an investigation that had been concluded some five months earlier and which explicitly found 'no cause for concern'? It seems like too much of a coincidence that you would want to look into old copvio investigations just a day after we had a debate about some content on the Consumer behaviour article in which you alleged plagiarism, without providing any supporting evidence. Now, why would you want to add this type of commentary to a closed investigation, unless you are trying to make some kind of mischief? BronHiggs (talk) 00:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

@BronHiggs: I was noting that you removed the copyright violation. Without a notation for each article under discussion, the day can't be cleared from the backlog. (The investigation wasn't "closed" at the WP:CP page, which was preventing that day from getting archived.) I was giving you credit, nothing more. Then I archived that day's log. I have been working on various copyright cleanup issues. One was the User:Grochim cleanup at WP:CCI. Another was the backlog at WP:CP. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
@Calliopejen1: The revision history for the page Marketing is somewhat confused as the copyvio tag was added and deleted several times over. In addition, a separate copyvio investigation was mounted for the same article around the same time that I placed my original notice about copyvios. However, I am quite certain that I did not take the notice down. The page editing history shows that the notice was on the page on 18 February, 2017 at 9.16 when Justlettersandnumbers made an edit. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing&diff=prev&oldid=766127733) The notice had disappeared by 11.21 on the same day when Trappist the monk made an edit. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marketing&diff=next&oldid=766127733). Neither edit summary mentions removing the notice, so I cannot say which of them deleted the notice. I have made very few edits to the Marketing page since I started editing on Wikipedia. In my very first few days editing marketing/advertising articles, I made a valiant effort to correct some misinformation on that page but was informed by another editor, who reverted everything I had added, that "some content just doesn't belong on Wikipedia." I also noticed that this same editor reverts most new contributions to this article and continues to do so. At that point, I decided that editing this article was simply a waste of my time and have since occupied my time eiting "low importance" and/or "stub" articles that are not so heavily patrolled and do not have editors exhibiting ownership type behaviours. Having said that, I was aware of the copyright issues on the Marketing article from the beginning of my WP career, it just took me a month or so to figure out the process for bringing these matters to Admin's attention. After that, I was content to let Admin handle the matter. It was not up to me to decide when the issue was closed, but it was clear from comments, made by the investigators on the article's talk page, that the investigation had concluded.I apologise if this seems to be carping, but there are so many bullies on Wikipedia, and many would love to seize on this sort of thing to point the finger. So, I am concerned that I will subsequently be accused of taking down a copyvio notice without the proper authorisation or some other perceived crime. BronHiggs (talk) 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
@BronHiggs: I agree that the revision history was somewhat confused but from my brief review it looked to me that you resolved the issue. All I was doing was noting that the issue had been resolved so that the day's worth of copyright violation to-dos could be archived. There is not really a formal process for an "investigation"--just a page where issues are listed and interested editors can help out. So even if you were the one who removed the tag there is no problem with this -- to the best of my understanding, the tag can be removed when the offending text is removed. There is no "perceived crime" here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
@Calliopejen1: OK, thanks. I am being paranoid, but there is a little group of editors following me around, deleting many contributions and making snide comments on various talk pages - so please forgive me if I am being overly cautious to avoid any trouble. BronHiggs (talk) 04:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Hassad has been accepted

Mohamed Hassad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

SPI over Khashayar Farzam

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I've opened an investigation at SPI over the unusual editing going on at Khashayar Farzam and its AFD discussion. Feel free to comment if there's anything you wanted to add! RA0808 talkcontribs 19:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

A breath of fresh air

… has blown through WP:CCI and WP:CP – thank you so much for all the cleaning and tidying and resolving you've done there, it's made a real dent in the appalling backlog(s). I've re-added the copyvio template to [:Vanessa Beecroft]], as there seems to be yet more to be dealt with there – I'll try to resolve that today if i can. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Come and join us at the Wiknic

LA Meetup: 6th Wiknic, 7/15 @ Pan Pacific Park

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You are cordially invited to the 6th Los Angeles Wiknic, a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is planned for Pan-Pacific Park and will be held on Saturday, July 15, 2017 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!

I hope to see you there! Howcheng (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Orphaned non-free image File:Idi Amin.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Idi Amin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

CCI notification

I am working on Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Corkythehornetfan

I don't see evidence that the subject has been contacted. I would have guessed this was required. I started to contact the subject about a question, and the subject was away at the time, but has now returned to editing. I would like to discuss this CCI with the editor, but I'd like to know whether they know about it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I think so, Sphilbrick, though perhaps there hasn't been a recent reminder (I think the user dislikes talk-page notices and quickly removes them). My notification here was quite a while ago. From what I recall, he/she was helpful and willing to assist with clean-up.
In general, I think a notification that a CCI has actually been opened is a pretty good idea, especially if there's ever going to be another backlog like the one Calliopejen1 has just taken an axe to. As far as I can see in Category:CCI templates and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Instructions, we don't have such a thing. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
When it may not be a big deal, I'm trying to sort out some timing issues. The CCI was created in 23 May of this year. I'm aware that the editor removes talk page notices but I naïvely thought I could start working after 23 May. I now see your edit in November 2015. I'm well aware that our volunteers in copyright areas are limited relative to the need, so I'm not casting any aspersions if it really took a year and a half to create the CCI after the request but I just want to make sure that I'm not missing anything.
While it may not be a big deal, I'm trying to sort out some timing issues. The CCI was created in 23 May of this year. I'm aware that the editor removes talk page notices but I naïvely thought I could start working after 23 May. I now see your edit in November 2015. I'm well aware that our volunteers in copyright areas are limited relative to the need, so I'm not casting any aspersions if it really took a year and a half to create the CCI after the request but I just want to make sure that I'm not missing anything. My goal is to have a discussion about how the editor may help in this review — you've suggested that they have indicated willingness, but I didn't want to find out that I had missed an extensive discussion.
My current understanding — you (Justlettersandnumbers) identified a need for a CCI in November 2015. You notified the editor at that time. A number of such requests languished until Calliopejen1 cleaned out a backlog recently.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
That sounds right. I opened a ton of CCIs in succession recently and don't think I re-notified anyone. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that you needed to, I just want to open a conversation with the editor and I wanted to make sure I understood what type of communication has already occurred.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand other language

Template:Expand other language has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 08:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Language Rfc survey vote reason

Hi, Calliopejen1, just checking whether you really meant one of the reasons you gave for your vote at the MOS/Layout Rfc. Your link to Template talk:Expand French doesn't support your vote, but a link to this or this would; did you perhaps mean one of those? Or something else? Mathglot (talk) 01:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Transporters

Just letting you know that I completed checking all pages here. I was using Earwig's Copyvio Detector, full check. It could help by including TCDB here, but for some reason it did not work, i.e. all overlaps with TCDB itself appeared at the top, just like before. My very best wishes (talk) 15:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

ANI post-mortem

Hi, Calliopejen1, I'd like to get some feedback and advice from you about ANI procedures generally and also your thoughts about what happened in the ANI case you raised about a user's massive template moves.

Although the thread at ANI which went absolutely nowhere isn't completely dead yet, it's moribund and likely will be dead by the time you read this. I was quite disappointed with the way it ended up, which is to say stillborn, and not because of "win/lose" because I really do believe in consensus even if it goes against my PoV, but rather because I thought that ANI was a place to raise such questions, and that we would get a lively discussion going among admins who would weigh in, possibly with numerous different angles to consider. But after a brief initial flurry of support, there was vociferous opposition from one corner (plus the understandable and civil opposition from the person whose behavior was being questioned), and the hoped-for discussion among multiple admins never really happened, because they never showed up. Instead, we had a duopoly dialog involving myself and one other involved editor which got stuck in a tar-field of strife based largely on factually erroneous claims not germane to your original post, but which managed to effectively derail the discussion.

The ANI thread (which I likely would have started a day or two later, had you not done so) asked for two remedies: a "knock it off" warning, which presumably you would have issued yourself had you not been involved, and a question on how to undo the changes. This almost seemed pro forma to me, and I awaited the scramble of uninvolved admins to jump in and do what was needed. Instead, after the brief flurry of support, crickets on the original topic, and lots of derailing.

In the run-up prior to Rfc and ANI, I feel like I hewed to all the guideline-approved behaviors: I only reverted the user's anti-consensus doc change once, allowing his willingness to edit war about it to install his favored version in the doc which was then referenced in the ANI as "consensus"; I made numerous pleas on his talk page to stop his behavior, rather than trying to massively undo it, which was alluded to at the ANI as WP:SILENCE and thus the new consensus; and finally, engaging in good faith in the ANI thread about the behavior itself, which when not being derailed was attacked as revenge-based and bloodthirsty (not by the unfailingly polite and civil editor whose behavior was the subject of the thread). This seems to lead inexorably to the lesson, "If you have a passion for a PoV in some relatively unwatched corner of the encyclopedia, alter the doc to suit, edit war to keep it, stay calm in discussions, and then just go for your desired change, and go for it massively."

What happened here? Was it just apathy on the part of other admins, or are they just busy with other things, or suffering burnout of their own, preferring to stick to the simple NPAs and uncivil/bullying complaints? Any advice on being a succesful ANI participant, if I decide to put my toe in those waters again? I noticed that you and 3 or 4 other editors or admins supporting your view weighed in once near the top, then not again. Is there some sort of unspoken rule about this? I didn't really wish to keep popping into the thread repeatedly, but I felt unable to just let patently false claims of easily diffable history stand unchallenged, and so I kept returning. Was that a mistake? Any other sage thoughts for encouraging successful ANI outcomes in the future? Thanks for raising the ANI, and in advance for any thoughts you add here. (And if you're feeling burnt out yourself, don't feel constrained to reply here if you don't wish to.) Happy trails, Mathglot (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@Mathglot: To be honest, I don't participate much at ANI--I generally just do my own thing in obscure areas and don't run into much conflict. So I don't really have any advice to offer. A couple random thoughts:
  • If Ettrig had kept doing moves, I think he probably would have gotten blocked. The ANI post had the intended effect of making him stop, even if he did not formally agree to do so. This is probably what drove the lack of participation.
  • I was really amazed by TimothyJosephWood's lack of judgment. It was enough to make me take note of his name in case he does an RFA in the future. The failure to distinguish between problematic behavior and content/policy disputes was pretty bizarre.
  • Rollback doesn't require administrative tools -- it's a separate right that many people have. You probably could get rollback yourself; I don't think it's that high a bar. (But I'm not an expert in this by any means!) That may be why we didn't get any interest at ANI once it became clear that Ettrig was no longer moving templates. (Perhaps I shouldn't have raised undoing the changes at all at ANI, and just done it once a broader discussion had proceeded re the changes.)
Anyways, I agree that the administrator response wasn't what I expected. If I had come across this, I would have left Ettrig a message saying that I would block him if he moved any more pages before gaining consensus. And I would have encouraged other editors to revert the changes because they were done without consensus. But I wasn't the one who came across it because I don't hang out at ANI looking for conflict! And the problem of polite but tendentious editors is a well-known one; Ettrig is but one example... Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Your response is much appreciated, thank you very much. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 02:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
Hello Calliopejen1!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

RachelWex 03:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Toast sandwich

DoctorWho42 has given you a Toast sandwich! Bread (🍞), toast (🔥), and bread (🍞) promotes WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day better. Toast sandwiches are wonderfully delicious! They are made by putting a thin slice of toast between two thin slices of bread with a layer of butter, and adding salt and pepper to taste. Its origins can be traced to the Victorian years. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a toast sandwich, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

I forgot I borrowed the code for my current page layout from you. Cheers

Spread the goodness of toast sandwiches by adding {{subst:Toast sandwich for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 18:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

This has to originate from, or at least be influenced by, the famous scene from Five Easy Pieces[a] with Jack Nicholson, or I miss my guess. Mathglot (talk) 05:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Notes

  1. ^ A scene which, inexplicably, the article on the film doesn't even mention, even though this is one of the most iconic scenessee clip on YouTube in all of filmdom.

Rollback issues

Hi Calliopejen1, and thanks for the rollback privilege. In looking at the current task, and why so many of the ones on the date I happened to pick (April 21: latest rev, all edits) are not rollbackable due to being one edit too late, I started examining some of them. I found there was a pattern of similar minor follow-up edits with the same edit history by a single user, EP111. Checking EP111's last 2500 edits and spot-checking some of the articles there, this doesn't appear to be abusive, and most of this user's edits, although overlapping a large number of French communes from the template move reversion list, actually go way beyond that list, and are hitting 2-5 articles per minute (none since 7/11). So I think this is likely a completely separate and unrelated activity, but it does effectively block a high percentage of the moves we're trying to undo. I suppose that means we have no recourse but manual revert for those cases? Mathglot (talk) 07:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

@Mathglot: Yes, agree that those edits are totally separate and legitimate, and results in the edits having to be manually undone... :( Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi again: please see this surprising and eyebrow-raising edit. I'm going to leave it as is, and assume for now that if this is the only one of its kind, it's just a hiccup. But something to keep a watchful eye on. Mathglot (talk) 02:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Holy shit. Now what? Mathglot (talk) 02:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm away, only sporadic internet. But I'm pretty sure this is a task for a bot. I looked at one of the reverts, I'd inadvertently undone the addition of an image, so it's kind of understandable. Ettrig could just have re-added that, of course. Mathglot, sorry if I messed up your workflow, I undid a couple of hundred (?) of the ones were latest edits before I saw the co-ordination page; then I did one day by hand. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 06:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Aha, yes the one of mine he reverted also was one where I inadvertently removed an image. I'll go fix that one. No worries on the workflow. Enjoy your awayness. Mathglot (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

10 years of adminship, today.

Wishing Calliopejen1 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Jen. I hope all is well in sunny LA. I think of the editors out there every now and then. Congrats on swinging the mop this long. I encourage you to celebrate by blocking a vandal before the sun sets over the PCH. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Congrats, Jen! --Rosiestep (talk) 12:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!! Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Awarded to Calliopejen1, for their tireless efforts in restoring many hundreds of articles to their proper state following a major disruption. This shows attributes of self-sacrifice, stick-to-it-iveness, and being a team player, as well as leadership. Mathglot (talk) 02:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Qais Ulfat

I noticed that you templated Draft:Qais Ulfat as promising. I am not going to argue about that. But did you notice that User:Faridahmadi.itp is permanently blocked as sockpuppet? Something that is quite hampering the work on this article. The Banner talk 21:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

I did not notice that, but that doesn't mean that another user couldn't build on what he started. (I don't know where we start getting into auto-deletion of banned user contributions, but I'm assuming that doesn't apply, or otherwise you would have mentioned it....) Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
That is okay to me. Just that you know. The Banner talk 21:41, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:41, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kazakhstan Independence Day has been accepted

Kazakhstan Independence Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

No need to tag these drafts

There's no need to tag drafts within the Missing State Supreme Court Justices project as "promising"; the subjects are inherently notable, and the drafts are being worked on constantly, if slowly, so the issue of deletion will never come up. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:History of Thailand since 2001

Question: Since you were the one who applied promising draft to the above page, I'd like to hear your thoughts about redirecting the page to History of Thailand since 1973 as a reasonable approximation to encourage development of mainspace. Hasteur (talk) 19:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

LA event this Thursday

LA Meetup: September 7 edit-a-thon near DTLA

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the LA84 Foundation in Jefferson Park (near DTLA) on Thursday, September 7, 2017 from 5:45 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.! This event aims to improve coverage of female Olympians and Paralympians (some of whom will be attending!). There will be a deejay and food/drinks, and kids are welcome.

I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group, follow our Twitter account, and like our Facebook page!! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Promising drafts discussion closed

I have closed a discussion that you initiated here. The result was a consensus to begin using the template. Cheers, Tazerdadog (talk) 22:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Calliopejen1/Archive_12&oldid=1147975737"