User talk:Carlyt28

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Carlyt28, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Canuckle (talk) 07:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1st Comment[edit]

Hi Carlyt28 -- I saw the discussion on the Shimi Kang deletion page, and, while my extremely strong recommendation is to not edit anything relating to Red Bow Creative, I don't know that we as experienced editors were helpful in explaining what happened in the discussion and why some people (generally good, kind people) reacted the way they did. If you'd like to talk more about it (though again, best not about how to recreate that article), leave a note here or on my talk page. Best, -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How to submit 1st article for review[edit]

HI Carlyt29 -- If you are wanting to post your first article that you need to confirm its appropriateness and lack of conflict of interest, you can submit a draft to review by Article Wizard. See here WP:WIZGO. Canuckle (talk) 07:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Redbowcreative (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carlyt28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(This is not the user -- it's someone else who watched the interactions on AfD) I disagree with the block on this account -- the previous account was blocked for violating username policy (being a shared use account); so the user created another account and immediately said that she or he created a new account the AfD discussion. Is this not what someone with few edits with a username block is supposed to do if they want to contribute to WP? (under WP:SOCK Legitimate Uses, "Correcting username violations") -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests cannot be made by proxy. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.