User talk:Casa Coto

This is Casa Coto's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Casa Coto! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for properly disclosing your affiliation to OBM on your user page. In compliance with our paid editing policy, please submit your article for review through AfC, which can be done using the template placed at the top of the draft page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If this company has received significant coverage, as the author claims in the earlier comment, then such coverage needs to be not only cited as references, but the draft should be based on them. The 'Bibliography' section is not part of referencing. In any case, even if we accept that Das Lexikon des deutsche Maschinenbaus provides sigcov, and is both reliable and independent (three 'ifs'), that is just one source. I'm potentially prepared to accept the MaschinenMarkt article as another. That's two. We need at least three solid sources, and, difficult as it is to evaluate offline sources, I don't think any of the other cited sources meet the WP:GNG standard. Thus, IMO this still falls short of satisfying WP:NCORP, or at least I cannot ascertain that it does satisfy it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]