User talk:Cavalry.charger

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Cavalry.charger. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

Hey, thanks for your contributions. Please remember to include citations when making substantive changes, or your edits may be reverted. See WP:CITE for more information. Thanks! —diff (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 Dec 2016[edit]

Hello. You have showed up at some US army truck articles I play with. These articles are written in US English and it looks like you are using UK English. Unless you mind when I notice one I am just going to change the spelling or whatever to US English. Not what you say, just how you spell it. If this is a problem please let me know. Thank you. Sammy D III (talk) 17:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in copy-editing army trucks in general I can show you several that need it badly. Sammy D III (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CAPFRAG and brevity[edit]

Please review WP:CAPFRAG and cease adding full stops to image captions that are not complete sentences. Secondly, adding unnecessary verbiage without any additional information diminishes the quality of writing. Please review WP:ATE. Thank you, Citobun (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English[edit]

In a recent edit to the page Douglas A2D Skyshark, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Hohum. I noticed that you made a change to an article, T-34, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (Hohum ^@) 12:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Cavalry.charger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Centurion (tank), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 02:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Surabaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pemuda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Type 95 Ha-Go light tank, without citing a reliable source; that is considered WP:OR. Also, do not add text into a cited sentence, when not present in the cited source used. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Kierzek (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pasir Panjang Pillbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Heritage Board (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mussel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC) [reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents here regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

let me just advice that it really doesn't take that much effort to cite your sources; just put the url (if it is a web source) between <ref>...</ref> or put the book name and author if it is a book etc Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:27, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Braddell-Westlake Secondary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braddell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Cavalry.charger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japanese occupation of Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory Garden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pasir Panjang Power Station[edit]

Hello, Cavalry.charger. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pasir Panjang Power Station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pasir Panjang Power Station[edit]

Hello, Cavalry.charger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pasir Panjang Power Station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Walter Model, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air force infantry and special forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Since you are not providing sources, I asked User:Domdeparis to know how to react. Aniway, please give your sources, all your edits are not improving wikipedia (read WP:V).--Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Cavalry.charger, but you've been warned numerous times, both here and on various talk pages, regarding your repeated addition and modification of content without locating reliable sources and citing those sources in-line with your edits. For you to be unblocked and allowed to edit Wikipedia as before, you'll need to request an unblock (see the directions above) and provide sufficient explanation regarding Wikipedia's policies in this area, why you repeatedly failed to comply with them, and how you'll improve your editing and comply with these policies in your edits in the future if you were to be unblocked. An admin will need to be satisfied with your request and explanation that you'll follow the relevant policies in the future, and before you'll be unblocked. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cavalry.charger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator(s), perhaps I may have come across as a pesky little insect constantly adding unsourced content on several Wikipedia pages and it may seem persistent, resulting in my being Blocked Indefinitely. First of all, I sincerely apologise for my actions. Truth be told, I am not intending to vandalise any pages with excessive content not backed up with proper sources, but then again I am unsure of how to properly include sources (despite reading through Wikipedia's guidelines). Some additions I have added are simply highlights from other sections of the page that may not be apparent and not unnecessary additions from elsewhere. In general, it is embarrassing that I am still relatively new to Wikipedia even for being a member of 3 years here, and there is much I can learn and improve on moving on! Indeed, I seek your forgiveness and I'll try my best to rid myself of such bad habits and mistakes on Wikipedia. Thank you and have a nice day.

Decline reason:

Please read this guide and demonstrate that you now understand how to cite sources. It would also help if you explained, in your own words, what a reliable source is. Once you do this, I think you should be unblocked. We just need to see that you understand our policies and can comply with them, that's all. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Cavalry.charger, and thank you for your unblock request and your honest comments. There's nothing to be embarrassed about in regards to asking others for help with Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. We were all new here at one point in time, and it should never be a "demerit" against you if you ask others for help. In fact, I think it should be a commendable thing to do, as opposed to repeatedly violating policy or causing disruption. ;-) Adding an in-line citation is very easy to do; we even have templates that make the process much simpler. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources (especially this section on how to use the {{cite web}} template for web page sources), as this will likely account for a significant amount of sources that you'll be adding to articles. I'm required to leave your unblock request for another administrator to review, but if another admin decides that this user should be unblocked, you do not need my permission or my blessing to do so - just go ahead and unblock. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kind sir! User: Oshwah

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cavalry.charger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator(s), based on what NinjaRobotPirate has advised me to do, I have read through Wikipedia's process of citing reliable sources when adding content on all pages and have understood the importance of such necessary actions. It is a strict but simple rule that all pages on Wikipedia requires a valid and substantiated source of information (coming from certified backgrounds such as (mainstream) certified news sources or books with validated and thoroughly-researched information) and should not be cited without any proof or purely based on what an individual and/or specific group claims or mentions. From all these, it is also clear that all my previous actions have contravened such a basic element of Wikipedia; once again, I am indeed remorseful for my unauthorised actions.

Accept reason:

I believe this explanation to be satisfactory, and I will remove the block. Please don't hesitate to ask questions seeking assistance; you may use the relevant article talk page, the Teahouse, or Help Desk. 331dot (talk) 07:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere appreciation, kind sir! @331dot. Thank you to all Administrators out there too, for giving me a second chance to reform myself.

@331dot: this user has picked up where he left off with this edit [1], there is a ton of info that he has added that is not in the source from that section [2] notably the bit about picking fruit. This edit [3]from a few days ago has additions in a similar veine " (Thompsons had already been widely used throughout China since the 1930s, at a time when several Chinese warlords and their military factions running various parts of the fragmented country made purchases of the weapon and then subsequently produced many local copies)." this addition was not sourced, it may well be true but there is no way of checking. The original version says that the Thompsons captured were of American origin and the new version says they were Chinese-made versions. Most of his additions are WP:OR. --Dom from Paris (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Cavalry.charger, you are not adding sources with your edits. This is a requirement, if you don't have a source for it, you can't add information to an article. I don't wish to see you blocked again, but if you continue to add unsourced information, it is a possibility. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot, the part regarding my edit on the "Thompson submachine gun" Page was simply an additional piece of information on Chinese Shanxi warlord Yan Xishan's Taiyuan Arsenal producing Thompsons for his military, as did various other warlords in China during the 1920s to the 1930s (you can check it up on the "Taiyuan Arsenal" Page). And regarding my edit to the "Western Water Catchment" Page, I admit I may have not been clear in adding the little bit of information at the end, regarding the picking of fruits from restricted military ground. I'll be looking around for a source to back up that last statement. Thank you. By Cavalry.charger

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Panther tank, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (Hohum ^@) 16:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]