User talk:ChNPP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ChNPP |
Diskussion
Diskussion
Discussion |
Beiträge
Beiträge
PRIS |
Email
Email
Email

Today is 9. May 2024. The English Wikipedia has 6,821,601 Articles.

This is a talk page.This page is used for discussion only. Please do not experiment on this page. You can experiment on your userpage, or in the sandbox. If you would like to leave me a message, click here. Thank you.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, ChNPP! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Pomingalarna (talk) 23:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hallo[edit]

Hallo Dirk! Endlich gibt es auch einen deutschen Benutzer in der englischen Wikipedia! Da können wir uns doch auf Deutsch unterhalten, oder? Welches Themengebiet hattest du dir eigentlich vorgenommen? Vielleicht könnten wir ja auch etwas zusammen machen. Gruß -- Felix König ✉ 14:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natürlich in Deutsch! Mein Englisch ist nicht das beste! Aber eigentlich dank der vielen Webcam-talks mit Jesse recht gut geworden. Der ist ja sowiso zur Zeit in Deutschland. Da hat mein Deutschkurs wunder bewirkt ;-)! Ich werde mich wieder auf mein Themengebiet stürtzen. Du weist was ich meine, oder? ;-)! Auch noch ein paar andere. Mal sehen :-D! Grüße ChNPP (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ach so ist das. Ja, ich weiß es. Ich denke, das ist das gleiche Themengebiet wie meines. Aber das ist ja ein Zufall: Zwei deutschsprachige Benutzer in der englischen Wikipedia, die das gleiche Themengebiet haben. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 14:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Meinst du nicht, dass das nicht schon ein wenig Lobby ist? Grüße ChNPP (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pfff! Was ist daran Lobby? Zählst du jetzt eigentlich zu den Kernkraftbefürwortern oder zu den Kernkraftgegnern, wenn du auf Lobby-Gedanken hast? Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 14:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Natürlich Befürworter :-)! naja, dann nehme ich das mit Lobbyist zurück :-)! grüße ChNPP (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ach so, da bin ich ja beruhigt ;-) Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 15:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So lange ich lebe, werde ich der Kernenergie treu bleiben! Es sei denn es gibt bis dahin schon was Besseres wie Energie aus alten Socken XD! Grüße ChNPP (talk) 15:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Das wäre toll, wenn es das gäbe. Aber wie das stinken würde! Da wäre ich immer noch für Kernenergie. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 15:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bushehr[edit]

... ist der absolute Super-GAU. Einen halb deutschen-halb englischen Satz habe ich vorerst ganz entfernt. Bitte korrigiere den und setze ihn wieder rein. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 11:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is your article ? then look at the map - it show NPP in the middle of the sea. 1st underwater one :-) 176.195.105.88 (talk) 16:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP, I have started the article, but the most of it is not mine. I don't know what you mean with "look at the map". The coordinates are correct and placed directly on BNPP unit 1. Best regards ChNPP (talk) 06:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Englisch[edit]

Du hast noch keinen einzigen fehlerfreien Edit gemacht, glaube ich ;-) Bei Montalto di Castro hattest du Einzelnachweise angegeben, aber keinen Abschnitt mit <references /> erstellt. Und so weiter... Ich glaube, ich werde dich überwachen :-D Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 09:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sicherlich :-P! Ne, ich komm mit dem ganzen Zeug in der Englischen nicht sehr gut zurecht. Die Artikel sind eine Katastrophe, die Formatierungen sind Katastrophal, vor allem die Belege sind der Super-GAU. Das irritiert mich alles. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hä? Das mit den Belegen und den Formatierungen funktioniert doch haargenau gleich wie in der deutschen Wikipedia! Verstehe ich nicht. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 16:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eben nicht. Mit Belegen meine ich das die keine Referenzen-Abschnitt schon drinnen haben. Und die Formatierungen sind etwas anders. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hä? Ich verstehe nicht, was du meinst. Bei en und de muss man das doch so machen:

== Einzelnachweise bzw. References == <references />

Oder was meintest du? Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 16:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ach doch ned des! Ich meine dass das nicht schon im Artikel ist und ich das extra einfügen muss! grüße ChNPP (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hä? In de muss ich das doch auch extra einfügen! Jetzt verstehe ich gar nichts mehr :-( Mal so eine Frage nebenbei: Was ist der Unterschied zwischen code und tt? Mit code: bla bla bla, und mit tt: bla bla bla. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 16:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn du mich fragst der Hintergrund ist bei code etwas dunkler als bei tt. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ich sehe da keinen Unterschied. Ich mache mal einen Test:
  • blablabla
  • blablabla
Jetzt hab ich's! Bei tt passt ist der Hintergrund normal, bei code immer weiß. Das wäre geklärt. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 16:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Das er4klärt auch den Farbunterschied. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 16:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, genau. Bei code ist es immer das gleiche strahlende Weiß. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 16:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Country specific nuclear information[edit]

Hi, ChNPP. There is a discussion how to organize the country specific nuclear energy information. Your opinion is welcome.Beagel (talk) 19:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo ChNPP. Ich habe dort schon meine Meinung gesagt. -- Felix König ✉ 16:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @Beagel: Oke, I will express my opinion. @Felix: Habe schon gesehen :-). --ChNPP (talk) 07:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, OK. But your English is not so good (instead of saying very bad ;-)) Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 09:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ich weis, mein englisch ist DER SUPER-GAU ;-). Wenn du meine Note im Englischen wüsstest ;-). Grüße ChNPP (talk) 09:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fünf? ;-) Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 10:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag: Ach, das ist ja seltsam! Hier auf en muss man ja die Infobox NPP manuell anpassen, das geht ja ger nicht automatisch :-O Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 10:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was meinst du mit Manuell anpassen? Grüße ChNPP (talk) 16:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Na, dass man den Namen selbst einschreiben muss. In de passt es das ja automatisch dem Lemma an. Wenn ich also die Infobox hier einfügen würde, würde sie User talk:ChNPP heißen. Tut sie aber nicht unbedingt:

{{Infobox power station |name = Bad Steben Nuclear Power Plant |image = |image_caption = Bad Steben Nuclear Power Plant |country = {{AUT}} |location = [[Berlin]] |coordinates = {{Coord|80.7461|12.8938|type:landmark_region:IR|display=inline,title}} |owner = Du |operator = Auch du }}

Und so weiter uns so fort. Verstehst du? Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 09:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wie nett das ich jetztv ein Kernkraftwerk betreibe :-). Auch wieder ein SOWDU ;-)? Naja, man könnte ja mal ein Anpassen der Infobox in der en auf deutsche Basis erwägen. Jedoch denke ich nicht das dies aufgrund der Unterentwicklung der englischen Wikipedia geht. Ich sage es mal auf Engtlisch damit alle es Verstehen: The english wikipedia is shit! (Thats i mean is the convertation of the infoboxes). Grüße ChNPP (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, ein SOWDU ;-) Ich wäre auch für eine Anpassung. Auch ansonsten gebe ich dir Recht. Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 08:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there[edit]

I knew from your name instantly that you had an interest in nuclear power, it's good to see. You've made some interesting images of various reactor designs, what do you use as your references? I'm always willing to learn more, especially about the nuclear industry, so do you have any interesting links or information that may be of help? Thanks Skyrail (talk) 22:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Skyrail, the drawings were on the pictures I've found with Google. The best I had sought me out and in Microsoft Pain drawn. But what I send links, since I am not sure. extend Had you thought of this? Greetings ChNPP (talk) 13:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

respectful disagreement[edit]

Hello Dirk. We dont all agree about nuclear power. While the English is a bit tricky, i thought i would share with you an article i found interesting recently. http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid467.php i am also thinking about a website (perhaps wiki based) were both pro and con positions on nuclear power could be voiced and people could then get informed arguments on both sides at one site. When i get this website up, i'll write you. i hope this finds you well. --Paxuscalta (talk) 09:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The poor photo that you keep adding into Deaerator[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to upload inappropriate images, such as into Deaerator, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked.

ChNPP:

Are you deliberately trying to be obnoxious by your repeated attempts to inject that very poor photo of a deaerator into the Deaerator article? Your attempt to hide your activities by making it appear that your sock puppet User:217.5.204.78 is making those repeated revisions really doesn't work ... its rather childish of you, isn't it?

That photo adds nothing to the article. Please be an adult gentleman and remove the photo yourself. mbeychok (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mbeychok, Sorry, but i'm not the IP 217.5.204.78. I have do this image only one in the article. You must talk to the IP, not to me. Greetings ChNPP (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I simply do not believe you and I repeat my request that you remove that photo. If not, I will ask to have you blocked. mbeychok (talk) 01:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Mbeychok, i think you have problems to check this: I not the IP! Yes, there is a photo of me. But it does not mean that I'm the IP. zzz... --ChNPP (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ich sage es mal auf Engtlisch damit alle es Verstehen: The english wikipedia is shit![edit]

"Ich sage es mal auf Engtlisch damit alle es Verstehen: The english wikipedia is shit!" ChNPP those are your words as stated in an above comment of yours.

Do you really think that "The english wikipedia is shit!" ? Or are those just some silly words by a 15 year old boy? mbeychok (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know the prehistory, when you not can speak german. The article of nuclear power plants is really bullshit. The article are not well written and the are very short. To short. Other article have no sources. This is really bad. This is to negligence of other users due. And in comparison to the german wikipedia is the english WP very, very shit. That's why I work even rare in the english Wikipedia and other wikipedias in other language. The russian wikipedia is as good as the german wikipedia. But the english wikipedia.... no, i dont see a future for the english version of the project, to much bad work with important sources or articles without any source. The english wikipedia become the note F. I hope this will improve it. Greetings ChNPP (talk) 12:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Montalto di Castro nuclear power station[edit]

Hello, you added an infobox to Montalto di Castro nuclear power station in which you stated that the reactors had been mothballed. Mothballing is a specific process for preserving a mechanical system (see Reserve fleet) - do you have a source saying that the Montalto di Castro nuclear power station was mothballed? Do you know if the Caorso Nuclear Power Plant or the Trillo Nuclear Power Plant were mothballed? Please reply on my talk page. Thanks! Simesa (talk) 09:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

== Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Discussion ==

Template:Discussion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Frozen4322 Talk Stalk Walk 14:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for your good work on List of canceled nuclear plants in the United States. Johnfos (talk) 23:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the Barnstar :-) . Regards ChNPP (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reactor Text Dump[edit]

That text originally came from the article on the Chernobyl Disaster incident itself, where it was even more sorely out of place. I went looking for a likely home. I agree that the RBMK article is a better place for it, thanks. Fell Gleaming(talk) 15:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think, the technical description is very good, but you can add this Information in all articels of NPPs with RBMK, but thats not good. Add this information in the article RBMK, thats the best way and place for this description. Regards ChNPP (talk) 18:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm agreeing with you. I didn't add the information per se, I moved it from one article to that one. Where it was originally was even worse.

Regards. Fell Gleaming(talk) 18:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jaitapur[edit]

of nothing--Dwalin (talk) 14:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

preposition о/об in russian[edit]

Hello! Preposition о written before consonant almost always in russian. Preposition об written before vowels almost always.--Philip J.1987qazwsx (talk) 12:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which of my edit is mean in your comment? Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 16:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Информация о энергоблоках ==> Информация об энергоблоках--Philip J.1987qazwsx (talk) 10:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And why you cantact me on my english user page and not on my russian? This has nothing todo with my edits in the english wikipedia! ...... ChNPP (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear power/nuclear energy[edit]

There is a discussion about usage of nuclear power v nuclear energy. As an experienced editor in this field you are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links in article 'Belarusian nuclear power plant project'[edit]

Hi. The article 'Belarusian nuclear power plant project' has some dead links that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix them?


Dead: http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.prdeta.htm?country=BY&refno=107

  • You added this in June 2010.
  • The bot tested this link on 15 March, 17 March, 19 March and today, but it never worked.
  • The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

Dead: http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.prdeta.htm?country=BY&refno=106

  • You added this in June 2010.
  • The bot tested this link on 15 March, 17 March, 19 March and today, but it never worked.
  • The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

These links are marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!


PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ISO8601 date format[edit]

Hello. I've noticed that you've used a local German date format (dd.mm.yyyy) on a number of pages you have edited. One such example is List of cancelled nuclear plants in the United States. (I have now edited this page.) May I suggest that you use the ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) in future edits? It's an international standard which was designed to well defined and unambiguous, which I believe is in the spirit of the Wikipedia project. For example, when I was looking at the table in the article mentioned above, I was unsure if the all the plants were closed the 1st of a month, or if all plants were closed in January, and had to consult an external source to find out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitro2k01 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nitro2k01, yes, I have used this format, because some other articles has also used this format. In further edits I can use the yyyy-mm-dd format, that's no problem. Best regards ChNPP (talk) 07:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ChNPP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ChNPP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ChNPP&oldid=1063848579"