User talk:Clayweintraub

Welcome!

Hello, Clayweintraub, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Rockefeller Jr.. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 20:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 72 hours; next block will be indef[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I did not know I was violating the rules of wikipeida I just got frustrated that people kept deleting that article for reasons that I think are ridiculous I guess i thought an edit war was the only option to gets users to leave the article alone now that i know it violates Wikipedia rules and there othor ways to handle article disputes i promise i will never engage in an edit war again

January 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, David Rockefeller Jr., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be engaged in precisely that which you have undertaken not to do, above. It appears to be for precisely the same reasons. Please modify your behaviour to be within the rules here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it appears to be precisely the same nonsense you were blocked for by Ohnoitsjamie in December 2021. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You have been blocked for one week from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Editing against the consensus of an Articles for Deletion debate is disruptive. You were warned and did it anyway. Cullen328 (talk) 21:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am sorry this wikipedia rules are and guidelines are complicated i was not trying to enange in an edit war i was just explain why the page should have not have been deleted and what i thought what should be done if the page remained deleted again this is complicated for me Clayweintraub (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Clayweintraub, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peggy Dulany have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peggy Dulany was changed by Clayweintraub (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955414 on 2023-06-05T00:53:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]