User talk:Cwf97/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Category:Animated films featuring female antagonists has been nominated for conversion
Category:Animated films featuring female antagonists has been nominated for conversion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Category:Comedy films featuring female antagonists has been nominated for renaming
Category:Comedy films featuring female antagonists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Category:Marvel Comics CGI characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Marvel Comics CGI characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 22:59, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Category:Robin (character) animated films has been nominated for merging
Category:Robin (character) animated films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 15:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Category:The Scorpion King video games has been nominated for merging
Category:The Scorpion King video games has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Cultural depictions of Jennifer Lopez has been nominated for deletion
Category:Cultural depictions of Jennifer Lopez has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (talk) 12:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Star Wars: The Force Awakens video games has been nominated for merging
Category:Star Wars: The Force Awakens video games has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker has been nominated for merging
Category:Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Star Wars: The Last Jedi has been nominated for merging
Category:Star Wars: The Last Jedi has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Comic book characters in other media has been nominated for merging
Category:Comic book characters in other media has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 2pou (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:DC Comics CGI characters
A tag has been placed on Category:DC Comics CGI characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:Hepatitis survivors has been nominated for deletion
Category:Hepatitis survivors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lyndsay Wrensen
Hello, Cwf97. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lyndsay Wrensen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Category:Video games based on Catwoman has been nominated for merging
Category:Video games based on Catwoman has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Horror films featuring female antagonists has been nominated for deletion
Category:Horror films featuring female antagonists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Lyndsay Wrensen
Hello, Cwf97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyndsay Wrensen".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Elijah Price
Hello, Cwf97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elijah Price, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Category:Pansexual actresses has been nominated for discussion
Category:Pansexual actresses has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tom Danson (talk) 03:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Elijah Price
Hello, Cwf97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elijah Price".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Unblock appeal
Cwf97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise not to make any new categories.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cwf97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise not to make any new categories and abuse sockpuppet accounts. Cwf97 (talk) 03:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've already demonstrated that we can't trust you, so this promise isn't remotely convincing. Yamla (talk) 10:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Category:Roberts acting family has been nominated for merging
Category:Roberts acting family has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Mortal Kombat guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Mortal Kombat guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Tony Hawk's (series) guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Tony Hawk's (series) guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Tekken guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Tekken guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Soulcalibur series guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Soulcalibur series guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Injustice (franchise) guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Injustice (franchise) guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Dead or Alive (franchise) guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Dead or Alive (franchise) guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Killer Instinct guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Killer Instinct guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Video game guest characters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Video game guest characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Marvel vs. Capcom fighters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Marvel vs. Capcom fighters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:SNK vs. Capcom fighters has been nominated for deletion
Category:SNK vs. Capcom fighters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale fighters has been nominated for deletion
Category:PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale fighters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 14:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Unblock appeal
Cwf97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise not to make any more sockpuppet accounts. I am not a sockpuppet of CensoredScribe.Cwf97 (talk) 05:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Firstly you'd need to explain why you took up a draft that had been created by a sock of CensoredScribe if you aren't them, but then you'd also need to explain whose socks are yours if you aren't CensoredScribe, since you admit you have been creating such accounts. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock appeal
Cwf97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My sockpuppet accounts include DunkaccinoPacino, RayDrum and Corey2003. CensoredScribe didn’t make them. I promise not to make anymore sockpuppet accounts. I took up a draft by CensoredScribe because I wanted to make another article.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Well, I can believe that you're not CensoredScribe, and I've said so before. But, seriously, what's up with the sock puppets? Stop creating sock puppets, follow the standard offer, and you'll probably get unblocked. Other people more disruptive than you have been unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- "Other people more disruptive than you have been unblocked" I could class as one of those that NinjaRobotPirate is on about so I will say that his advice is spot on about the standard offer. Further, editing another wikipedia can also help (either in another language, Simple English wiki https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page or other Wikimedia project. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
"You'll get your rent when you fix this damn door!" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect You'll get your rent when you fix this damn door! and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#You'll get your rent when you fix this damn door! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 21:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Category:Megamind video games has been nominated for deletion
Category:Megamind video games has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Indagate (talk) 16:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gotham Girls into Draft:Lobo (2000 web series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Category:Films featuring Marvin the Martian has been nominated for renaming
Category:Films featuring Marvin the Martian has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Unblock appeal
Cwf97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not making any more sockpuppet accounts after 6 months. I am also not going to make any categories without permission. Last but not least, I am not going to make any disruptive edits by being more communicative and providing clarity.
Accept reason:
I've unblocked you, but please keep in mind this discussion about your edits at an admin board and the notes on your talk page. Please start slow and ask for assistance at the tea house or help desk when you're not sure about something. My reading of the admin board discussion is that you were simply partially blocked, rather than topic banned, but please be aware that other people might not agree with that interpretation. I think it would be a good idea to go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard and ask for clarification on the matter before editing categories. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
You're on the right track, but can you update your unblock request with a few more details than that? If so, I think there'd be a case to unblock you. You can see what we're looking for at WP:GAB. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Already updated. Cwf97 (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- OK, you're definitely getting there, but "I won't be disruptive" is kind of vague. Some of the past problems with your editing would have be solved if you were more communicative. When the community raises an issue with your editing, you should address it. That's kind of a basic thing, so I'll just kind of assume that's what you meant above, and I'm saying it here now, anyway. I'll ask the original blocking admin what he thinks about unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- I made it less vague. Cwf97 (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Why did you create categories Category:2010s Japanese-language films and Category:Video games about prejudice? Who did you discuss it with first? Your unblock appeal claimed you would not. You've made a dozen other categories as well.
- Could you explain to me how, as a defining trait, every single Shrek video game is about prejudice? How about Shadow the Hedgehog (video game), a Featured Article that makes no mention what so ever about prejudice? The same question for every other game you added to this category?
- You do not appear to have heeded any of the advice NRP gave you in unblocking you.
- @NinjaRobotPirate as info. -- ferret (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am sorry for creating these. Cwf97 (talk) 23:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's not an explanation. I'm not asking for an apology. Why did you create them? How does "Video games about prejudice" apply as a defining trait of the games you placed it in? -- ferret (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I was trying to make more categories. I am not going to create any more categories from now on. Cwf97 (talk) 23:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please answer the questions. It's not just about creating categories, but also placing articles in the categories. -- ferret (talk) 23:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Some Shrek games, particularly those based on the films are about prejudice. Shadow the Hedgehog is about prejudice towards human beings. Cwf97 (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- The entirety of Shred video games and X-men video games are not about prejudice. Please do not edit categories further. I'm not convinced you understand how they should be applied or what a defining trait is. -- ferret (talk) 01:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The original block was on category namespace. It could be restored if there are still problems. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The entirety of Shred video games and X-men video games are not about prejudice. Please do not edit categories further. I'm not convinced you understand how they should be applied or what a defining trait is. -- ferret (talk) 01:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Some Shrek games, particularly those based on the films are about prejudice. Shadow the Hedgehog is about prejudice towards human beings. Cwf97 (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please answer the questions. It's not just about creating categories, but also placing articles in the categories. -- ferret (talk) 23:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I was trying to make more categories. I am not going to create any more categories from now on. Cwf97 (talk) 23:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's not an explanation. I'm not asking for an apology. Why did you create them? How does "Video games about prejudice" apply as a defining trait of the games you placed it in? -- ferret (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am sorry for creating these. Cwf97 (talk) 23:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I made it less vague. Cwf97 (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- OK, you're definitely getting there, but "I won't be disruptive" is kind of vague. Some of the past problems with your editing would have be solved if you were more communicative. When the community raises an issue with your editing, you should address it. That's kind of a basic thing, so I'll just kind of assume that's what you meant above, and I'm saying it here now, anyway. I'll ask the original blocking admin what he thinks about unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Underworld: The Eternal War, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see references on any of your last 10-15 edits, Cwf97. Nor edit summaries explaining any of them. -- ferret (talk) 01:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
DCAU New Article Feedback
Hello Cwf97, the copy editor User:AngusWOOF is reviewing a draft of a new DCAU article I am trying to have published. He has directed me to seek the feedback of people like you who have edited the DCAU page in the past to provide feedback as to whether or not you believe the content I included is something Wikipedia readers interested in the DCAU would find value in. Mainly the copy editing team would like feedback on the table depicting chronological narrative viewing order, I would appreciate it if you can review my inquiry and the draft article and inform if you think the content is of value to those who may be reading about or wanting to watch the DCAU. This will help get the copy editing team the feedback they need to proceed with either an approve or decline decision. Thanks for your feedback.
JGott85
Inquiry to fellow DC Fans based on Copy Editors Feedback:
Draft Article attempting to be published
Draft:DC Animated Universe (DCAU) Media Continuity, Canonicity, and Viewing Order JGott85 (talk) 01:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Cwf97, I see you made updates the draft. Could you please state if you are supportive or not supportive of the article being published and the inclusion of the Optimal Viewing Sequence table? That is the feedback the Copy Editor is looking for from someone other than myself. Thanks. JGott85 (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
"Ya like jazz?" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ya like jazz? and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Ya like jazz? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Venom (Sam Raimi film series)
Hello, Cwf97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venom (Sam Raimi film series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lobo (2000 web series) (November 29)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lobo (2000 web series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Concern regarding Draft:Fantastic Four: Flame On
Hello, Cwf97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fantastic Four: Flame On, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Creation of inappropriate categories again
Could you please explaining why you're editing categories again, including recreating and re-populating categories deleted at CfD? Could you also explain if you have any relation to the user Flowersnf59? -- ferret (talk) 02:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Flowersnf59 is my mom and I like updating categories. Cwf97 (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've reinstated your block. It's clear that despite my numerous attempts to couch you on this topic, you are not going to stop. I've also blocked that sock account. -- ferret (talk) 14:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Fantastic Four: Flame On
Hello, Cwf97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fantastic Four: Flame On".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Chicken Run has been nominated for deletion
Category:Chicken Run has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
"You will never rise from the ashes of your shame and humiliation!" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect You will never rise from the ashes of your shame and humiliation! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § You will never rise from the ashes of your shame and humiliation! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Jump and press the circle button has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § Jump and press the circle button until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Trouble with the trolley, eh? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § Trouble with the trolley, eh? until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
"Pizza time" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Pizza time has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § Pizza time until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
"I think Coolsville sucks" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect I think Coolsville sucks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § I think Coolsville sucks until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
"You're my boy, Blue!" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect You're my boy, Blue! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § You're my boy, Blue! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
"I think I smell a barbecue!" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect I think I smell a barbecue! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § I think I smell a barbecue! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
"Qwarktastic!" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Qwarktastic! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § Qwarktastic! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect You're not just wrong, you're stupid. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § You're not just wrong, you're stupid. until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
"Get in the flask!" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Get in the flask! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § Get in the flask! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect You are one ugly motherfucker! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3 § You are one ugly motherfucker! until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)