User talk:Dabomb87/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

List of Governors of Delaware FLRC

Thanks for doing this and bringing this to my attention. It had been on my back burner for a long time. --Golbez (talk) 02:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Hanna FAC

I have ordered the refs now. Anymore copy edit help would be greatly appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I really thank you for your fine copyediting. You're good at it. As you see, I'm better at fact gathering and refs ;-). I've addressed all your 2nd round, leaving you one question on the live action issue. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
That was fast! :D Dabomb87 (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I was working Karanacs and jumped onto yours when I was done with hers. I'm motivated to get this to FA, and with you and her helping, we may actually make it ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 01:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Fixed groundbreaking — Rlevse • Talk • 02:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
fixed latest round. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
fixed latest round last night. Since Karanacs isn't answering my questions in her section, what should we do with the personal life section (topic vs time)? Yes, I posted on her page a few days ago too. Tks for all the help. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I'll try to put up a few more things. I won't be able to access WP for an extended time until tomorrow. As for Karanacs, her contributions show that she is actively editing. Perhaps leave another reminder on her talk page and wait a couple more days before asking someone else. The issues she raised were hers, she has the best ideas on how to fix them. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Check Karanacs' edits to the article and he comment last night on the FAC page. Looks like she's willing to support once I go through the Barbera book, which is coming from a library to me. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
My library autobio book on Barbera is in. We'll pick it up tomorrow, Tues. Let me know on my talk page is you want me to look for anything specific. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

2005 Sugar Bowl

I've made the changes you suggested to the FAC. If there's anything else, could you let me know? Thanks! JKBrooks85 (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Further changes have been made. Thanks for picking them out! You've got a good eye for that. JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

revisit Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1964 Gabon coup d'état

Hi, I've left some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1964 Gabon coup d'état. If you have time, I wonder if you would revisit it? Thanks, Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 00:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Effects of Hurricane Dean in the Greater Antilles

Are there any more issues that I can address to secure your support in this article's ongoing FAC? Plasticup T/C 03:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hanna

See User_talk:Karanacs#Barbera_book_and_William_Hanna_FAC. If you could look over the updates and smooth them, I'd appreciate it. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Took a shot at fixing the latest round. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

FLC

Thanks! I replied on the FLC. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks


<font=3> Thanks again for your support and comments - Hillsgrove Covered Bridge made featured article today!
Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Myst IV: Revelation

Hate to bother you about this, but you're currently the only oppose and I was wondering if you would have time to look over it this week. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 01:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

William Hanna

Thanks so much for your help. Check your barnstar page. It's not an FA (see WP:FA but Gimmebot hasn't run to update the page yet). I plan to do Joseph Barbera next as they were partners for 60 years so there's lots of overlap. Thanks again, I couldn't have done it without you. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your peer reviews

I will finish my review (last one left) soon, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Barbera

Hi. I think I have this close to FAC ready. Could you please look it over? Would you prefer I nom it for FAC now or after you look it over? Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll look over it now. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
"Why "especially Collier's"?" because that's where he had the most success with magazines. Cut out "especially" or clarify? — Rlevse • Talk • 21:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)...Also see where I moved the phonetics, what should be done with that? — Rlevse • Talk • 21:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The pronunciation is fine; clarify especially. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I have a watch on your page, so you don't need to ping my talk to tell me you answered, unless you just want to. ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 23:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I can't find refs for any of "Cartoon Network put up a bumper in late December 2006 that showed Barbera in a black marker portrait. In the next scene, the words "We'll miss you" were written above the Cartoon Network logo. Adult Swim had a banner that said "Joseph Barbera [1911-2006]" with the banner fading out without showing their logo at the end, something they only do when a person they consider important passes away and something they had done twice before; for Harry Goz in 2003 and Sam Loeb in 2005." If I cut it, should I leave the Death section separate or put in Personal section like I did with Hanna? — Rlevse • Talk • 00:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)...Done with your items. When we finish this cartoon ref/adult swim item, should we list for FAC? — Rlevse • Talk • 00:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Merge the Death section with the Personal section. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to cut the unref'd stuff. Then list for FAC, or do you think it's not ready? — Rlevse • Talk • 01:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Looking back at the Hanna FAC, there were three issues: prose (FA criterion 1a), comprehensiveness (1b), and images (3). The prose is much better this time, I can't judge on comprehensiveness, and the single image seems to meet standards. So yes, I think it's ready. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
The prose is better because most of this is a copy from Hanna and you and Karanacs made it so good, the images is a learned lesson, and it's more comprehensive because I found more info on his personal life. Thanks. It'll be listed in a few minutes. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Ned Kock and possible promotion

Hi, I have seen you marked Ned Kock for speedy deletion. I came across Media naturalness theory which seams to be promoted by the same user, 15 links within short time [1]. Would be nice if you can have a look. - 83.254.214.192 (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Please don't enter incorrect information

In the Austin article, the original statement before your edits was that Austin has 3 Fortune 1000 companies. When you changed this to F500, you should have rechecked the source. Please don't enter incorrect information into articles when editing them. After I corrected your first mistaken edit, you reentered it again, please take the time to read the documents your are sourcing and contact other editors who are seeking to correct the articles before blindly reentering the incorrect information. TheMindsEye (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I did read the source, it's right here: [2]. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

FLC: The Office episodes

Thanks for your comments. I left some replies on the FLC page. Nergaal (talk) 22:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Help a old bridge's structure? (Language-wise)

Hi, I have noticed that you are doing a good job in locating prose issues in Featured Article Candidates. I am planning to nominate Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge for Featured Article in the future and would like to get an opinion on its current form. If you have the time, please take a look at the article and drop your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge/archive1. I would greatly appreciate it if you would like to attempt to copyedit the article as well. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 00:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure. I'll tackle this tomorrow. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review of Louvre Abu Dhabi

Thanks for your review of the Louvre Abu Dhabi article. Could you just clarify on a few of your points? See the review page for more. Thanks, --Jordan Contribs 17:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I've fixed up the article according to your suggestions. Anything else? Jordan Contribs 12:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
I've fixed the formatting of the prices. All of the other points you have raised have been dealt with, besides the quotes point. How's the article looking? Jordan Contribs 14:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Much better. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your effort in peer reviewing this article. Your comments and suggestions were a great help. It looks like it might make GA now, thanks to you. Much appreciated, Jordan Contribs 09:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

London PR

Hi there!

Thanks for letting me know, I missed it from my watchlist! :) The Helpful One (Review) 17:57, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

O'Brien

Thanks, I have tried to address your points so far. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 08:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I've replied again. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Date script

Hey, I recall Tony using the date script to remove linking from dates and see that you are doing so. How can one use the script? Many thanks, sephiroth bcr (converse) 17:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your interest in removing this next-to-useless feature. Here are the instructions, copied from one of Tony1's subpages: Dabomb87 (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Installation and usage of date-autoformatting removal script


Instructions for installation

  • EITHER: If you have a monobook already, go to it, click "edit this page", and paste in this string underneath your existing script:
importScript('User:Lightmouse/monobook.js/script.js');
  • OR: If you don't have a monobook.js page, create one using this title:
[[User:[your username]/monobook.js]]
Then click on "edit this page" and paste in at the top the "importScript" string you see three lines above here.
  • Hit "Save page".
  • Refresh your cache (instructions at top of monobook).
  • You're ready to start.


Applying the script—it's very simple

  • Go to an article and determine whether US or international format is used. (For this purpose, it's best to have selected "no preferences" for dates in your user preferences, which will display the raw date formats that our readers see. Otherwise, you'll need to check in edit mode.) Occasionally, you'll see that the wrong format is used (check MOSNUM's guidance on this carefully).
  • Click on "edit this page". You'll see the list of script commands under "what links here". Click on either "delink all dates to dmy" (international format) or "delink all dates to mdy" (US format).
  • The diff will automatically appear. Check through the changes you're making before saving them. If there are problems, fix them manually before saving, or cancel.
  • Leave a note at the article talk page if editors need to negotiate which format to use, or need to be alerted to any other date-related issues.
  • Click on "Save page": it's done.


Afterwards

  • Respond politely and promptly to any critical comments on your talk page. If someone wants to resist or revert, it's better to back down and move on to improve other articles where WPians appreciate your efforts. NEVER edit-war over date autoformatting; raise the issue at WT:MOSNUM.

Notes

  • [1] Treats only square-bracketed dates. The script removes square brackets only, which mostly involves the main text and footnotes; it's acceptable for citation-generated dates to be of a different format, particularly ISO (which must not be used in the main text).
  • [2] Piped year-links ([[1989 in baseball|1989]]). On purpose, the script will not touch these.
  • [3] Date-sorting templates in tables. As of August 23, a minor tweak must be made to the script (which will update automatically), to deal with the column-sorting template in tables. Please be aware of this in relation to Featured Lists and the like (i.e., hold off there until it's fixed). The "dts" and "dts2" templates are at issue, and can be identified in display mode by a small clickable item at the top of a column. This should be fixed soon.
  • [4] Antiquity-related articles. Articles on topics such as ancient Rome should be treated with caution, since the script removes year-links as well, and some editors may argue that there's a case for retaining the simple year and century links from ancient times (e.g., 212). It's better to ask first in these cases. In any case, such articles contain few if any full dates.

Re: Charlie Sheen page

I apologize about the links. They weren't added intentionally, but I think were included accidentally in the course of some edits I made. So sorry about that, and thanks for letting me know. I'll be mindful in the future to look out for mistakes like that that I may inadvertently make. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.219.45 (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Flag of Japan

Thanks for the help at the peer review. I snagged everything you mentioned. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: PR comments

Thanks for reviewing Family Moving Day (I've cleaned it up at your word). Now, shall you please check how well this TV show list is going? --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 05:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure. I'll make comments in the evening. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:FAC#Sri_Lankan_Tamil_people

Can you do me a favor and copyedit this? I would like to see it make FA. Either edit yourself or leave suggestions on FAC page like you have before and I'll even do it, though I've never edited it before. When this is done I'll support it. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Working on this. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Let me know when you're done and if you think it's FA ready at that point. Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2002 NFL Expansion Draft

Please see if current revisions have addressed your concern and improved the list enough to change your mind. The intro section was considerably revamped. Thank you very much for your time and assistance. 2008Olympian chitchatseemywork 00:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Does your strikethroughs mean that you are voting to Support the nomination now?--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 02:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Not yet, I want to give the article a once-over tomorrow before supporting. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

FAC Operation Tractable

I think I've resolved most of the minor prose issues you brought up in the FAC. Feel free to check to see whether they've been fixed or not. All the best, Cam (Chat) 00:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:MOSNUM

Please see the ongoing discussion over linking dates, particularly years in historical articles. -- Kendrick7talk 20:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect edit

In this edit you replaced the date 1978-02-22 with the date February 2, 1978. Please undo all the edits made with this script. If you intend to continue using the script, please fix it first. --Gerry Ashton (talk) 04:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For the peer review. It gave me some ideas of where to go next. MBisanz talk 14:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Question em dash

Hi there, you wrote in the peer review of United Nations article: "Em dashes should be unspaced." Is this the same with en dash? Is it meaning that 1293 – 1820 should be 1293–1820 (in headers, (), plain text, and so on)? If you need a better example please have a look ar List of mayors of Hamburg — it's on peer review too. I'm no native speaker and don't know about this, and wp:mosnum wasn't very helpfull for me. Please answer right here, I'll watch this page. Thank you. Sebastian scha. (talk) 01:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I've put in a query at the MOS talk page. I'll tell you the answer as soon as somebody can tell me. Please continue to watch this page. I will tell you however, that en dashes are spaced when used as stylistic alternatives to em dashes. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Answer: For this instance, yes, the en dashes should be unspaced in all instances (1293–1820). An explanation is here. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. That helped. Sebastian scha. (talk) 03:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

script for removing date autoformatting

Delighted to that you're using it. However, there's been a complaint about [this], where a wrongly used ISO has been wrongly translated. Have you tweaked your version of the script to translate ISOs? If so, well and good, but it appears to need correction. Thanks. Tony (talk) 02:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

This is much easier on the fingers. There's also a list here. Tony (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Don't know what you're trying to tell me, I am using the script. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Sri Lankan Tamil people

See barnstar page.

Location links

Hey, per the WP:MOS it's recommended that city and state links are kept separate so if someone wants to click on the state then they can do so. Also, to update templates, just WP:PURGE the page. Gary King (talk) 01:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, per Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context—"It is generally not necessary to link individual words when a phrase has its own article." Ontario, Canada has its own article, and it has a link to Canada on the first line. We don't need two links when one will suffice. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Additionally, I tried purging the page as per your link but it did not work :S Dabomb87 (talk) 02:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Well it's not a phrase, first of all. They are both two distinctly separate things. I imagine that that suggestion is referring to something like linking "Lipstick on a pig" rather than "Lipstick on a pig". In the case of cities and countries, however, I'm pretty sure that if someone was to click on the country then they would expect to be brought to the country's article. Gary King (talk) 02:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, it's not a big deal to me. Whatever's better for the reader. *shrugs* Dabomb87 (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

FLCs

All done at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Dave Matthews Band and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Wilfrid Laurier University people. Gary King (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Cheers thanks! If you've got a chance, perhaps take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of anthems by country and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of universities in Ontario; both have been at FLC for two weeks and need more comments. Thanks again! Gary King (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:17, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to say thank you for reviewing several FLCs. Your work is very appreciated. -- Scorpion0422 15:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Beck Gary King (talk) 02:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Supergrass discography

Hi.

Thanks for the comments at PR. What "specific examples" need copy-editing?

--TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 21:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Again, thanks. Could you please read through it now, see if everything is OK? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 15:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Do you think it's ready to nominate at FLC? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 12:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I left more comments on the peer review. You do have the peer review page on your watchlist, correct? Dabomb87 (talk) 12:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I do have it on watchlist. I've pretty much sorted all the problems. If you don't have anymore comments for the PR, I shall close it so I can nominate it for FLC. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 15:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

flc

Thanks. I, however, have a midterm tomorrow, so I'll try to get to it ASAP thereafter. Pandacomics (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of female Nobel laureates

Eco and David have finished their image audit. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 22:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service

I addressed all but one of your comments which I didn't understand. You wrote "Why is there a key for a symbol that is not used? " what do you mean by that? Thanks for the review. MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Three entries use this key! Have a look at entry 99, 100 and 108. MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! Do I get your support now? MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Washington Nationals Opening Day starting pitchers

I have addressed the comments and suggestions you made for this article. please let me know if you have any other suggestions or questions. Alansohn (talk) 04:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I have replied to and addressed your second set of comments. Please let me know if there are any other comments you have about the article. Alansohn (talk) 15:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I have addressed your latest suggestion and added an entry to the key describing the link for each season. Thanks for the suggestion and let me know if you have any others. Alansohn (talk) 20:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I Should Coco @ GAN

Hi.

Would you please be able to review I Should Coco which is a good article nomination? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 14:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. Not really sure where I post reply comments to a review so I'll post here. The [3] link is reliable because the website is run by the band members and has been for years. I'm sure that makes it reliable. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 17:11, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
You can post your replies on the review page itself. Talk:I Should Coco/GA1 Dabomb87 (talk) 17:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I think everything has been sorted now. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 19:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Lead section So the lead needs expanding. Do I include things that have been said later on in the article and do I need to include all the refs? I've never really done a lead section before. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 19:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Basically, a lead section is a general overview of the rest of the article. Wikipedia:Lead section says: "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any notable controversies that may exist." References are not necessary in the lead unless it has statistics, direct quotes, or other contentious information. A rule of thumb when writing leads is this: For each level 2 or level 3 section of prose (paragraphs and sentences) , summarize that section with at least one sentence in the lead; sections with more information should have more than one sentence. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I've made a start on the lead. How's it looking? Am I doing OK with it? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 22:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Pretty good. At some point, you should split the lead into separate paragraphs. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Does it still need expanding? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 03:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Looks a lot better now. I'll give it a more thorough look tomorrow. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Have you had a look at this yet? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 00:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Passed. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

FLC

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that I have removed most of the images that didn't have proper information per your comment here. As well, the FLCon is currently running and unfortunately part of the problem with it is that most of our current regular reviewers are entrants. I would hate for people to lose in the contest solely because of a lack of reviewers, so could you please take a look at some of the following FLCs if you have time?

Thanks for your time, and the reviews you have been doing at FLC are VERY appreciated, Scorpion0422 18:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the welcome. Shiva (Viṣṇu) (talk) 23:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello - (I had just asked SandyGeorgia about this) why was the link to India removed in this case? Surely the country is important and relevant, so it can't possibly be overlinking. Shiva (Viṣṇu) (talk) 00:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
India is another of those commonly known places that doesn't need to be linked. If readers really want to get to the India, then they can use the search box or go through the Mumbai article. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Isn't it more convenient and user-friendly to have a link? Anyway, while I don't agree about countries and historical events, but I will follow your advice. Shiva (Viṣṇu) (talk) 00:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
This is actually a rather controversial idea (what to link). I suggest you see the discussions at WT:OVERLINK, WT:MOSLINK, and make comments there. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by David Bowie

Hi Dabomb87, I've made some alterations to List of awards and nominations received by David Bowie as per your suggestions at the FLC. Thanks for your input, --JD554 (talk) 09:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I've made a change based on your latest comment. Thanks, --JD554 (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2003

Hello. Regarding the article I wrote about the List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2003, I have made the changes you suggested on your review. If there's anything else, please let me know.

Thanks you, Jaespinoza (talk) 06:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

USAD National Championships FLC

Hi. I responded to your concerns with the FLC. I'm pretty sure I fixed all the problems that you brought up. Thanks for looking at the list! - Yohhans talk 18:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Responded to the last concern you had. Thanks again for taking the time to review the list. - Yohhans talk 01:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Just a quick thank you

I just wanted to take the time to personally thank you for going through the ISS EVA list, (and trust me, I know that one wasn't easy to read through! lol) and for the suggestions for improvements. Hopefully just the linking issue remains, (plus the linking issue I actually thought of, lol). I'm interested in what your opinion is regarding the thoughts I posted, and I wanted to sincerely thank you for the time it took you to go through this list. I really truly do appreciate it! Ariel♥Gold 00:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Extreme points of Bulgaria

I've responded to your comments. When you get the chance go back to the FL discussion and tell me what you think. Thanks! --Mr.crabby (Talk) 01:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Replies at List of Milwaukee Brewers Opening Day starting pitchers

I have made changes to List of Milwaukee Brewers Opening Day starting pitchers per your suggestions, which were most helpful. Please let me know if you have any other comments or suggestions regarding the article. Alansohn (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Please take a look at these...

I'm about to begin a featured topic concerning these. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of North Melbourne Football Club coaches

Any chance, you'd be able to look over this article and comment on it please? Any help would be greatly appreciated. C4v3m4n (talk) 23:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Requesting peer review

Hey, I'm working on a few lists; they won't pass FLC as they all have less than ten items, but I'd still like to at least get them peer reviewed. If you have a chance, could you post some comments at their peer reviews? (If they don't have peer reviews open, then please post comments on their talk pages). They are:

Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks for the reviews! I will address them now. Gary King (talk) 16:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Also if you don't mind, could you check out the PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Apple mergers and acquisitions/archive1? Thanks! Gary King (talk) 18:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Delinking

Please stop your delinking activities. There is no mandate whatsoever to delink, for example, the nationalities of the subjects of biographical articles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Cy Young Award

Hey there, do you mind checking out this FLC and leaving comments? Thanks, iMatthew (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

I finished everything, thanks! iMatthew (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I've been really busy. I'll try to get to it tonight or tomorrow. Sorry again, iMatthew (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I just finished it. iMatthew (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

History of Indiana FAC

Yes the article has undergone a fairly thorough copy edit by several editors. Please recheck it again if you should have the time. Thanks Charles Edward 01:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of One Piece video games (2nd try)

All of your issues have been replied to. -- Goodraise (talk) 09:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Once more: All of your issues have been replied to. -- Goodraise (talk) 21:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
And a third time: All of your issues have been replied to. -- Goodraise (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Forth time: All of your issues have been replied to. (Do you even wish to be notified?) -- Goodraise (talk) 00:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

my FLC

I know it sounds kinda lame to say this (but I guess not really), but I do sincerely thank you for supporting my FLC. Haha. Supports tend to be few and far in-between. Pandacomics (talk) 03:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dabomb87/Archive_2&oldid=1190124445"