User talk:Danielin1987

July 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Speak Now (Taylor's Version). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The standard norm on Wikipedia is, when the album is labelled "universal acclaim" by Metacritic, any criticism becomes insignificant and is not notable in the lead. Criticism is included in the lead only if the album is labelled "generally favorable reviews" or "mixed reviews". Please stop repeatedly adding what you're adding at this instant. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 20:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, following up on your claim that "[you] made a point of why the critics...", no, it was actually Граймс who originally added that line to the lead, when the album was rated below 80 and had been labelled "generally positive reviews" on Metacritic. That's not the case right now. Learn about WP:UNDUE AND WP:BALANCE if you want to edit seriously. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 21:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Generally positive reviews, but most of critics agreed it was unnecessary the lyric change. There are references on the page. It's you who's trying to hide some facts from people. Who pays you? Taylor? Danielin1987 (talk) 21:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am following the guidelines established by Wikipedia. It is highly likely you will be blocked from editing if you do not follow the rules as well. One of the core concepts in editing Wikipedia is WP:GOODFAITH. ℛonherry☘ 23:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please learn how to edit the lead. The lyric change content is covered in the Crit Rec section, and is not notable in the lead as the album has received "universal acclaim"; it would be notable in the lead had it been "generally favorable reviews". That's the standard norm on Wikipedia for album articles. I'm trying to teach you, so learn. I won't repeat the same again and again. ℛonherry☘ 23:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was not the first who posted the critics rating at the beginning of the article, it was another user and you removed it. You're not a leader, you're just a woke user who don't like people know why the album was given negative reviews in the name of progressivism and the so-called ''feminism'. Don't be such a hypocrite. Danielin1987 (talk) 00:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Speak Now (Taylor's Version), you may be blocked from editing. ℛonherry☘ 21:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep reverting my edition? Is it that bad that people know the album was given less rating than the original because critics thought it was not OK the lyric change? Are you trying to hide information? It's you who's vandalizing my edition over and over. Danielin1987 (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have been disruptive and will be reverted as you possess all the characteristics of a vandal. I repeat, please do not continue on this disruptive, ill-motivated path or you could be blocked from editing permanently. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 23:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, they haven't been disruptive. It's the truth, but you want to hide it at all cost. That's what you are, a bunch of hypocrites disguised as ''feminists'' and progressives. As I told you, I was not the first one who edited the critics reviews at the beginning of the article. You removed it. That's hiding the truth because the first lines are mostly what people read. They usually don't scroll down to see what critics said. That's Vandalism. Shame on you. A good album turned out to be a crap for a line change and you're covering it. Hypocrite. Danielin1987 (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking others on Wikipedia is strongly against the rules. Do not continue or you will be reported to WP:ANI. Thank you. Граймс (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since when telling the truth became attacking? Are you aware the person I was having previous conversation was hiding information from Speak Now (Taylor's Version) article? You should be censoring that user, not me. Danielin1987 (talk) 20:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Due to your ongoing disruptive editing, including edit warring, editing against consensus and pushing a point of view, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing Speak Now (Taylor's Version). You are free to make well-referenced edit requests at Talk:Speak Now (Taylor's Version), and to edit elsewhere. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 01:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a formal warning: Any further personal attacks against other editors will result in a sitewide block. Cullen328 (talk) 01:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a formal warning: I reported you and all the wokes implied in these attemps to censored me to WP:ANI. Why don't you go to Cuba, where censorship is permited? Any further attempts to censor any articles edited by me, I'm gonna report you to WP:ANI. I don't care who you are or your beliefs. You've been trying to censor and hide the truth. I don't care if you blocked me from editing Speak Now (Taylor's Version). Other people will do the same thing. Let's see if you can censor all of them. See ya! Danielin1987 (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there are any attempts to disrupt that article, it will be protected until the threat of disruption no longer exists. Cullen328 (talk) 02:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And fuck you again. Danielin1987 (talk) 02:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You disregarded my very clear warning against engaging in personal attacks on other editors. Any further misconduct will result in your talk page access being revoked. Cullen328 (talk) 02:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you Danielin1987 (talk) 02:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page access has been revoked due to ad hominem attacks. See WP:UTRS for your options going forward. Cullen328 (talk) 02:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]