User talk:Dannywiki1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dannywiki1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Chillum 17:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. kashmiri ^TALK 18:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dannywiki1 reported by User:Kashmiri (Result: ). Thank you. kashmiri ^TALK 19:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you've been edit warring against User:Kashmiri on a number of articles related to Sufi religious men. It may be in your interest to come to the noticeboard and explain the rationale for your changes. With no answer from you, admins may decide that one or both of you has bad intentions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamza Makhdoom[edit]

your placement of a WP:G4 speedy deletion tag on Hamza Makhdoom is inappropriate. That tag is only used if the article has been deleted previously after a deletion discussion such as WP:AFD. The article was deleted before but as far as I can tell no discussion took place. -- GB fan 20:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamza Makhdoom. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Hari Parbat. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannywiki1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This all Starts from unprofessional behaviour of user:Kashmiri from Article Sultan ul Arifeen, its requested to you kindly view the history of Sultan ul Arifeen, i Enter there Verifiable Book and web citations but user:Kashmiri again and again delete or revert it, he/she fails to put something positive for improvement in that article, he again and again vandalise my edits and forcing Hamza Makhdoom and Hari Parbat as Sultan ul Arifeen with out providing facts, my objection on Hari Parbat is on base of lack of verifiable book and website citations Dannywiki1 (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were clearly edit-warring; also see WP:NOTTHEM. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note that this user along with others have been blocked as confirmed sockpuppets of User:Mrashid364. I have changed the duration of the block to reflect this. Bjelleklang - talk 20:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of mrashid364 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bjelleklang - talk 20:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]