User talk:Mrashid364

Removing AfD template[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sultan ul arifeen. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 18:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sultan Bahoo: The Life and Teachings— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AFD[edit]

- When you replying on AFD's comments go below,
- When commenting you put *''Keep''' or *''Delete''' followed by a reason - Headers shouldn't be added either,

Thank you. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Mujtaba Akhir Zamani. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 23:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Risala Roohi Shareef, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 23:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Shams-ul-Fuqara. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 23:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sarwari Qadiri[edit]

Hi, may I know why you reverted all my tedious work of removing WP:OVERLINKING from Sarwari Qadiri and restored a much worse version? kashmiri ^TALK 17:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sarwari Qadiri. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You undid all my tedious work that consisted nearly exclusively of removing WP:OVERLINKING. kashmiri ^TALK 17:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sarwari Qadiri. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. kashmiri ^TALK 11:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sultan-ul-Arifeen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan-ul-Arifeen[edit]

Please note that Sultan-ul-Arifeen is about a title, which was used by many people, and not about any particular person. Your continuous forcing Sultan Bahu into the article, adding person infobox, etc., constitutes disruptive editing. Consider yourself warned. kashmiri ^TALK 11:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sultan-ul-Arifeen. kashmiri ^TALK 17:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinitely for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrashid364. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bjelleklang - talk 20:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrashid364 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not related to any account,mostly I use my personal, office, university, internet IP to login in my account named User:mrashid364, I strongly rejected relation with other accounts,Sufism is my life style and I like Article related to this Topic, and perform formatting and give citations from Books and websites to make Articles batter, As I am initial user and trying to knowing Wikipedia Rules, I can provide my Identification separate from other accounts, youkindly recheck my status and unblock my Account. Mrashid364 (talk) 08:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've run a checkuser, and your account is Technically indistinguishable to Dannywiki1 (talk · contribs). In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Shams ul Fuqara[edit]

Hello Mrashid364. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shams ul Fuqara".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Shams ul Fuqara}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]