Under no circumstances remove this article through speedy deletion. If you HONESTLY believe that it is not worthy of Wikipedia, take it to AFD. Necroidmancer 03:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 16:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There's a product info on the Microsoft Windows Mobile page, which should be considered an independent source, as the company isn't related to microsoft. There is also reviews there.[1]--[|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 08:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd let you know that the page you linked to is just a copy of the JSJ press release. I don't think it can be counted as an independent source, because they apparently release anything sent to them that seems appropriate. JulesH 23:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First things first- the images don't even match the links. Featured articles have nothing to do with vandalism nor does edit counts have to do with the Crab Nebula. Secondly, try using the Click template for your pictures. --The preceding comment was signed byUser:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 02:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's slightly different to my current user page (which is soon to be a "portal" style like yours or AndonicO's) but does it have any errors like the other time? --The preceding comment was signed byUser:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what I mean. Remember how you emailed me a picture of what you saw which didn't match the one I saw nor the library's view? Well, at least I can use "float" properly now... --The preceding comment was signed byUser:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There's only two differences from before- the end part is split into two columns and the "real life" is actually moved from the left to the right and the edit counter is moved slightly to the left. --The preceding comment was signed byUser:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please also consider placing a warning tag on the authors talk-page. That will help trace repeat offenders. Thanks. Agathoclea 23:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
Thank you for the message. I am still trying to figure out how to edit here, but what I have corrected were spelling, and content clarification, on information not factual "only". Thank you very much.
Re: User talk:70.95.136.95 from [|.Z.K|] 00:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC
I'd blocked this account, then noticed your doppelganger notice. I assume you'd like the account to remain blocked? -- Longhair\talk 05:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Thank you for your advice about making an account. That is a good idea.
Re:User talk:70.95.136.95[|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 01:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Your user page...
...was under attack from a bunch of new users, who seem to know you in real life.[2] As such, I've semi-protected your userpage for 5 days. If you wish for me to remove this for any reason, please just ask. I did the same with User:Kzrulzuall/UserPage, for the same reasons.[3] Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 09:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have indefblocked the User:Checkuser Admin account, because its name suggests that its creator is (a) a Wikipedia admin, and (b) has checkuser privileges, as per Wikipedia's username policy. -- The Anome 09:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ngchikit 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Grand LisboaNgchikit 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The opening of above casino is reported by CNN. [4] Is that notable enough for you now? Ngchikit 13th Feb 2007. 13:24 Hong Kong Time.[reply]
Page vandalism
Hi This User:Trampton(owner of the page that you say I vandalized),What do you mean that what I wrote is nonsense,that science is not god? or what?That is my page and have the freedom to write what I want, is this not a free website?, that you can write what want?What do you believe in?What Saikano wrote that science is god?Please do not take it the wrong way,please reply. 71.96.243.187 09:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, your user page is very cool, second is: is it possible for me to clean my discussion page and start over again? (Trampton 05:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)).
\[reply]
Coffee Page
Hi you removed the edit I did for the coffee page, and I was very curious as to why this happened. Especially since the LDS section seems slightly irrelevant. (religious section) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.17.230 (talk)
Aladdin (List of movies sorted by uses of word fuck)
You reverted my edit on what was pretty obviously vandalized before I fixed it. Even if for some reason you thought that the movie with the most fucks in it was Aladdin, you might note that every other link in the same row points to the movie in question.
I keep getting messages that I've edited some page about some weird tool (crocodile shears?) and I haven't done anything nor have I even heard of this thing. I just want to know how to get rid of the message and why I'm being charged with vandalism on trying to delete messages on my own IP (UserTalk:65.255.130.104). I don't who is doing this with my IP or why, but it's getting old. -A Concerned User
P.S. I posted this on my page.
whts your problem man? ur fucking me up just beacuse im saying something that u dont know, do i have to make a photo from my cd? 1971!!!!!!!
oh i see, Ok, i understand! :D i was just trying to make it more human! :D
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[reply]
Simpsons WikiProject
Greetings, The Simpsons WikiProect is currently trying to decide on five episode articles to classify as being high importance and as a member of the WikiProject, your input would be appreciated. You can vote here. Thanks for the time, Scorpion 07:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Dutrochet.jpg
Any image of him published while he was alive would be public domain today. —Chowbok☠ 16:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above archive is a past discussion. Please direct all new discussion to the current talk page. Thank you.