User talk:David Jordan

Re: Mecca, Ca.[edit]

California project[edit]

Some California-related stuff going on at Wikipedia.

Google Wifi[edit]

This really isn't the place to ask that stuff, but check Google's FAQ and the forum referenced on that page. (John User:Jwy talk) 21:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, or are you asking that be put in the article? (John User:Jwy talk) 21:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Old stuff follows[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, David Jordan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 22:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi, just so you're aware, you've misspelled the word 'and' in the filename of the file "IRAQ map black nad white.jpg" Zmbe 00:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Springs Valley[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you added information about CalTrans to the Deep Springs Valley article. Deep Springs College bought that station some 10 years ago (it is now called Henderson Station by the college). I studied there 2002-4, and at that time, Caltrans had reduced their presence to a collection of road signs and occasional equipment that they kept near the station. Unless they've recently expanded this collection, I feel that 'operates' and 'facility' are strong words. Where did you get your information from? Unless I'm mistaken, I'll correct your paragraph in a few days. Jugander 16:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion[edit]

The following images that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in their not being deleted. Thank you.

—Psychonaut 23:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Two Girls and a Guy[edit]

Thanks for adding the stub categories to Two Girls and a Guy while I was busy rifling through the list of all possible stubs... User:David Jordan 11/19/2006.

No problem! I'm surprised that it didn't already exist, considering the cast list. It's a good film. Perhaps you can look at the film infobox template as something else to add to raise the standard of the article, along with all of the great information that you have already contributed? Regards, (aeropagitica) 23:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not repost deleted material[edit]

You have recently re-created the article Image:CRISCO systems.jpg, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. —Psychonaut 14:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GIF images[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you have uploaded a number of images in the GIF image format. As I try to convert all of these to the smaller, lossless PNG format, would you like me to change the images on your userpage as well? If you'd like to give me a hand with converting all of them, it would be appreciated, as it will take me quite a while on my own, if it gets done at all. ---Remember the dot 05:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mood fart.gif is a great example of an image which has been significantly distorted by being in the GIF format. The GIF format is limited to a palette of 256 colors, making it really really bad for photographs. Please save your images in the PNG format instead because it is 100% lossless - it will not distort images in the slightest.---Remember the dot 04:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:OLD MV2.JPG, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 08:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Snow Creek Village[edit]

Hi Brien. Snow Creek Village, California is south of Interstate 10 near Cabazon, I think. It's between Beaumont and Whitewater somewhere. It consists of about 40 homes: a small place. It was described in the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Riverside Ranger Unit Fire Management Plan 2005. The plan talks about areas with vegetation fire problems — so someplace of similar size out by Blythe might not be listed. User:David Jordan 11/27/2006.

Hi David. I still can't find much information on Snow Creek Village, you are right--it must be quite small. I have, however, stumbled into more unincorporated communities in Riverside County from the County's Building & Safety page. Some of them, like Glen Valley and Glen Ivy, are also found in my Thomas Guide. If you're still interested in helping track down small inland empire communities, there are a lot of good leads here. Thanks, Brien Clark 16:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello – Based on your significant contribution to one or more San Francisco Bay Area-related articles and/or stated interests on your homepage, I thought you might be interested in this project:

You have been invited to join the WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of the Bay Area. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!

Peter G Werner 05:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Guinevere_dvd.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Guinevere_dvd.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trunked 5ch central control.png[edit]

Since you asked so nicely, I've listed Image:Trunked 5ch central control.png at WP:IfD for you. Don't hold your breath for Microsoft SVG support! Stannered 23:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Caltrans toll receipt.png[edit]

Hello, David Jordan. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Caltrans toll receipt.png) was found at the following location: User:David Jordan. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

trunked radios[edit]

David

 We are looking for someone with expertise in trunked radios systems.  Are you interested in talking with us?

Mike

Image:TRACON 1 5 manual cover.png[edit]

Hello David Jordan, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:TRACON 1 5 manual cover.png) was found at the following location: User:David Jordan. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ice castles jacket.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ice castles jacket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The Getaway VHS.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Getaway VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:About Last Night VHS.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:About Last Night VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dancing at the Blue Iguana.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dancing at the Blue Iguana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Image:Dreamlife of Angels film VHS.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Image:Dreamlife of Angels film VHS.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Caltrans toll receipt.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Caltrans toll receipt.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CDCAndRehab.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CDCAndRehab.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TRACON 1 5 manual cover.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TRACON 1 5 manual cover.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dogtown VHS jacket art thumbnail.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dogtown VHS jacket art thumbnail.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Access 1 1 cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Access 1 1 cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:H23AAB and P33AAC Handie Talkie Manual.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:H23AAB and P33AAC Handie Talkie Manual.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Go Now VHS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Go Now VHS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Highway Jacket DVD.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Highway Jacket DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Seven girls DVD jacket megan abubo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Seven girls DVD jacket megan abubo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use claims, et al[edit]

The fair use rationale for the above items was based on information written by some of the same people on the legal team who wrote the Creative Commons Share Alike license. Somebody has it way off. You? Me?

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Two Girls and a Guy VHS screener.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Two Girls and a Guy VHS screener.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tracon 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tracon 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Borland Delphi 3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Borland Delphi 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Emergency Encounters cover.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Emergency Encounters cover.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CA-178[edit]

Galleries are discouraged at Wikipedia; you may want to upload your images to commons instead. See Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Photo_galleries for more information. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lewis_and_clark_and_george_VHS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lewis_and_clark_and_george_VHS.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OLD MV2.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:OLD MV2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Discover card telemarketing call.ogg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Discover card telemarketing call.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 02:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC) --MBisanz ^talk 02:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:US UTM Zones.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:US UTM Zones.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IRAQ map black nad white.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IRAQ map black nad white.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Death valley junct coin.jpg[edit]

File:Death valley junct coin.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Death valley junct coin.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Death valley junct coin.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:136 to 174 MHz US base station antennas.jpg is now available as Commons:File:136 to 174 MHz base station antennas.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello David Jordan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 937 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Stephen Fox (author/educator) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work![edit]

Hi David,

I see you've been having a lot of images removed for copyright reasons. I know there's always a bit of a twinge of "Hey, now really?" when you get one of those templates on your talk page: it happens to me a lot because of images I work on for the Graphic Lab if I worked on an image which later turns out to have copyright issues, I get another template on my talk page! I see a lot of photos by you, and I firmly believe that if you're actually out there collecting free content, you're one of the good guys and deserve a pat on the back, so here it is!

Anyway, I've re-drawn your base station image as an svg, as per a Graphic Lab request. Check it out: File:Base_station_2_channel_block_diagram.svg --Slashme (talk) 19:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Repeater duplexer.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Repeater duplexer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:ANACONDA.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Apple Jacks La Honda CA.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Burbank School Santa Clara Co CA.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Burbank theater san jose.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cold storage beach st.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tracon for DOS Cassette[edit]

I noticed that you had previously uploaded a photo of the cassette tape that was included with the old Tracon for DOS. Something that I've wished for AGES was an MP3 recording of that cassette (I lost my tape during Hurricane Andrew in 1992 in Miami, Florida).

I don't suppose that you might have an MP3 recording of the cassette? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.55.234.30 (talk) 12:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Mannon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Mannon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Mannon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Maproom (talk) 16:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Falsing[edit]

The article Falsing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 11 years, tagged as such for 8 years - if no sources can be supplied for this content it should not be in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 21:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:D-q university entrance.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:D-q university entrance.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul A. Grimm[edit]

The article Paul A. Grimm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

GNG and NARTIST fail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lost Lake Resort, California for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lost Lake Resort, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Lake Resort, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of River Bend Lodge, California for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article River Bend Lodge, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Bend Lodge, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 7 Girls[edit]

The article 7 Girls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marked unreferenced for years and still no improvement. No significant coverage or review of the subject can be found. I can't even find the subject in sites like IMDB. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seven girls DVD jacket megan abubo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seven girls DVD jacket megan abubo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sargent, California[edit]

The article Sargent, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is sourced mostly to maps; the level of detail is beyond what one could get from a map or atlas, suggesting this piece is full of OR. I could not find any information about Sargent or Sargent's in newspaper or book searches. Satellite images show a couple of buildings alongside the tracks, suggesting this was just a railway point and not a "town". If the article is kept it should be trimmed down tot he Sargent Oil Field and renamed, since that is the only part of the article with proper sourcing. For the rest, without RS discussing the place it fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rucker, California[edit]

The article Rucker, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

By its own admission, this article is describing a rail siding, not an "unincorporated community". Sourced mostly to maps; the rest is OR. Reference 5 might be reliable but appears from citation to just support existence, not provide secondary coverage. There is indeed a Rucker Avenue and Rucker School but these don't establish there was a community; likely just the name of an early landowner. No information found about this location; fails WP:V that it was a "community". Also fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Specialized Mobile Radio for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Specialized Mobile Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specialized Mobile Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mount Signal, California[edit]

The article Mount Signal, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. While there is plenty about Mount Signal, the mountain, there is next to nothing about any "community" of Mount Signal, despite what the OR in this article would claim. The two cited sources are insufficient for notability and the rest is speculation or synthesis. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]