User talk:Digvijay Mishra 99

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions were undone, because they introduced formatting errors, grammatical mistakes, and other problems. Please go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already. utcursch | talk 13:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Again, please go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already -- your references are not correctly formatted. Also, you please don't use 11th century texts or their translations (without scholarly commentary) as sources for history-related articles. Have a look at WP:PRIMARY and WP:HISTRS. Also, "Chandel" was not a surname of the Chandela kings - it is used as a surname today, but it's use as a surname for the Chandela kings is anachronistic. utcursch | talk 15:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Chandelas of Jejakabhukti, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 04:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ToucanPickles. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paramardi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ToucanPickles (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paramardi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alha. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandelas of Jejakabhukti.  पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Digvijay Mishra 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm just editing with sources Digvijay Mishra 99 (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's not what you were doing. 331dot (talk) 17:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Personal attack

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Chandelas of Jejakabhukti. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 01:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Chandelas Chahamanas War moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chandelas Chahamanas War, is not suitable as written to remain published.

The text is not coherent and the topic is not made clear, and the sources are not presented in a useful format. Since Draft:Chandelas Chahamanas War already existed, you can work on that page and when you feel that it meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move it to article space yourself. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppet note

FTR: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. Digvijay Mishra 99, it is very obvious that you are the same user as Mohammad asfaq (talk · contribs), who is blocked from editing Wikipedia articles (but not other Wikipedia pages). Creating a new account to get around the block is a violation of Wikipedia's rules. --bonadea contributions talk 11:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

No I'm profesor of deegree college of T.D. college Jaunpur and I'm bramhin not akshay rajput Digvijay Mishra 99 (talk) 01:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chandelas Chahamanas War (2)

Hello, Digvijay Mishra 99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chandelas Chahamanas War (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chandelas Chahamanas War (2)

Hello, Digvijay Mishra 99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chandelas Chahamanas War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)