User talk:Djmaschek/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Pratt's Texas Battery
Worked on 10th Texas Field Battery (aka Pratt's Texas Battery and sometimes Hynson's Texas Battery in 1864 and '65), but haven't found anything in the 1861-mid 1862 that the battery did. Have any sources you've run into say anything about this? That's a pretty sizable gap in unit history that would be nice to fill. (It was brigaded under W. H. Parsons for at least part of 1862, if that helps). Hog Farm Talk 04:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: See 12th Texas Cavalry Regiment and [1] William H. Parsons and [2] 10th Texas Field Artillery at Handbook of Texas. That's all I know. I have the Confederate Military History of Louisiana and Arkansas, but not Texas. It might be in the Texas book. Djmaschek (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
|
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your recent assessments of articles submitted to MilHist assessment and for fixing my typos! It is much appreciated! Zawed (talk) 05:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
A Barnstar for You
|
The Pelican in Her Piety Barnstar | |
| The Pelican in Her Piety Barnstar is given to recognize editors who have improved the coverage of Louisiana on Wikipedia. For your reassessment of Étienne Perier (governor) and guidance in further improvement of the article. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 23:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for your contributions
I was looking at the Picketts Mill, New Hope Church, and Dallas wikipedia pages. I saw that they've been improved substantially, a lot of which was your doing. (Especially the Dallas page)
It's really awesome to see, and especially because it means more people will know more now about these battles. JokedOut789 (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Gilgal Church
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Gilgal Church you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Gilgal Church
The article Battle of Gilgal Church you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Gilgal Church for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Gilgal Church
The article Battle of Gilgal Church you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Battle of Gilgal Church for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
FAC review
Hi Djmaschek, you were kind enough to review Hundred Years' War, 1345–1347 at GAN recently. It is now at FAC, and if you felt able to review it against the FAC criteria it would be much appreciated. Obviously, if you would prefer not to that is not an issue. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Your B Class assessment of the above noted a cite problem. I do believe I have solved it. Could you please take another look and either rate the article B Class or Start?Georgejdorner (talk) 23:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive |  |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
Thank you for the pictures in Bernardo, Texas
I really like the pictures you uploaded and added to that article. It's much better because of them. BernardoSulzbach (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- @BernardoSulzbach: You're welcome! I'm glad you enjoyed the photos. I post pictures of small towns in the rural counties west, northwest, and southwest of Houston, Texas. Djmaschek (talk) 01:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
British general officers killed French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars
Hi, this is a bit out of the blue but I know you as someone who has made a distinct impression on French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars content here, and am hoping you might be able to assist me. I am currently creating a list of British general officers killed in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, and believe I have produced most of the information needed for the Napoleonic side of things.
While I would appreciate any comments you might have on that, my main question refers to the French Revolutionary Wars. I have not managed to find any sources listing general officer losses as some do for the Napoleonic Wars, apart from the mentioning of Sir Ralph Abercromby. Was he truly the only loss of the general officer corps in this period, or are there just no obvious sources for this information?
Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- See Barnard Foord Bowes. Off the top of my head there were also John Moore (British Army officer), Thomas Picton, John Le Marchant (British Army officer, born 1766), Daniel Hoghton, Robert Craufurd, Henry MacKinnon, and Andrew Hay (British Army officer) in the 1800-1815 period. For the 1792-1799 period all I can think of is John Mansel. Robert Anstruther (British Army officer) died in the field, but not in combat. Djmaschek (talk) 22:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've got all of those apart from Mansel, who so far is the only 1792-1799 general I can find too! I've got Anstruther down as dying from pneumonia, by the way. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
I recently rewrote this one to prevent it from having to go through WP:FAR. Would you be willing to give this a read-through to see if you notice any issues? Hog Farm Talk 18:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Please see my comments on the Hindman talk page. Djmaschek (talk) 22:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Knoxville
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Knoxville you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Knoxville
The article Siege of Knoxville you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Siege of Knoxville for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Knoxville
The article Siege of Knoxville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Knoxville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 13:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Thanks for your GA review of the Siege of Knoxville article. Djmaschek (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Many thanks!
|
The Napoleonic Era Barnstar | |
| Thank you for taking the time to not only review the article, but to provide some much needed advice. The equivalent page for the US order of battle is in a wikitable. I think that, when time allows, this will be the way forward. Your assistance is greatly appreciated by me, and this is the first barnstar I have given. Keith H99 (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks: Battle of Cassville
Thanks for your new look, evaluation and contribution of Battle of Cassville. Donner60 (talk) 00:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 125th Illinois Infantry Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shrapnel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Cassville
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Cassville you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Cassville
The article Battle of Cassville you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Cassville for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 00:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Cassville
The article Battle of Cassville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Cassville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
1st Texas Battery
I get a ping every time something links to 10th Texas Field Battery since I created that one, so I noticed this creation. I think the link you're looking for with Richmond is Battle of Richmond, Louisiana but I wanted to double check before adding. Hog Farm Talk 21:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I missed that one. I can use it in the 18th Texas Infantry Regiment article. Blessington's account says the Texans were "slaying them by hundreds", while Mower's report in the OR says total Union casualties were 1 killed and 8 wounded. Djmaschek (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Junaluska and "View History"
Thanks for reviewing Junaluska for B-class! I saw your assessment note suggested reviewing the "View History". Is this a specific source? I was mainly only working on the article as part of an attempt to do some destubbing, but I want to get it as comprehensive as possible. Hog Farm Talk 23:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- When I suggested checking "View History" I only meant for you to look at my 2 edit revision comments. Djmaschek (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
"Civil War Months"
I'm unfamiliar with this website and saw it on the Henderson's Hill B-class assessment request - are the authors generally reasonably qualified for the subject matter? Hog Farm Talk 05:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Here is a bio of the author, who published a Civil War book. The "Civil War Months" website looks legitimate. The information fits with what my other sources stated. I don't see any reason not to use this material. [3] Djmaschek (talk) 19:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Any interest in being a MILHIST coord?
The annual MILHIST coordinator election is beginning in a little over a week, and I was wondering if you'd have any interest in standing as a candidate this year. Hog Farm Talk 00:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations - August 2022 MilHist Article Writing Contest
|
The WikiChevrons | |
| On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the August 2022 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 36 points from 6 articles. Well done! Zawed (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign
I have American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign up for review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign/archive2. If you have the time to take a look at it again, that would be greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've been very busy lately with other things beside Wikipedia. I've never done a FA nomination and do not know what is expected of me. Djmaschek (talk) 19:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan Miguel de Vives y Feliu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junta.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of M1857 12-pounder Napoleon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M1857 12-pounder Napoleon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations - November 2022 MilHist Article Writing Contest
|
The Writer's Barnstar | |
| On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Writer's Barnstar for placing second in the November 2022 Military History Article Writing Contest with 18 points from three articles. Congratulations, Zawed (talk) 01:59, 4 December 2022 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of M1857 12-pounder Napoleon
The article M1857 12-pounder Napoleon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M1857 12-pounder Napoleon for comments about the article, and Talk:M1857 12-pounder Napoleon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
|
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} | 
|
Donner60 (talk) 00:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Military Historian of the Year, 2022
|
The Silver Wiki | |
| Congratulations! You have been selected in second place for the Military Historian of the Year by a popular vote of your WikiProject Military history peers in recognition of your contributions to the English Wikipedia's coverage of military history. As the lead coordinator, it is my pleasure to present the esteemed Silver Wiki. Please accept this token of our gratitude and appreciation. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 3-inch ordnance rifle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 3-inch ordnance rifle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 3-inch ordnance rifle
The article 3-inch ordnance rifle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:3-inch ordnance rifle for comments about the article, and Talk:3-inch ordnance rifle/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of M1841 12-pounder howitzer
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M1841 12-pounder howitzer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of M1841 12-pounder howitzer
The article M1841 12-pounder howitzer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M1841 12-pounder howitzer for comments about the article, and Talk:M1841 12-pounder howitzer/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
The article 1st U.S. Artillery, Battery F has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Company-level military subunits such as batteries are usually not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MKFI (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
I have finished addressing all the points you raised in the GA review. Thanks! StAnselm (talk) 12:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 10-pounder Parrott rifle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 10-pounder Parrott rifle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 10-pounder Parrott rifle
The article 10-pounder Parrott rifle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:10-pounder Parrott rifle and Talk:10-pounder Parrott rifle/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 10-pounder Parrott rifle
The article 10-pounder Parrott rifle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:10-pounder Parrott rifle for comments about the article, and Talk:10-pounder Parrott rifle/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
History of military logistics
Could I trouble you for a review of History of military logistics at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/History of military logistics? You don't have to review the whole thing, but you are more knowledgeable about the early modern era than I am. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Hawkeye7: I read it from the Introduction through the 19th century section and made very few minor edits. It is very thorough. I have just two comments. (1) In the 16th & 17th century section, paragraph 3, I noticed that the article stated that bronze and brass were used for artillery pieces. I only know about 1780-1860 artillery, but it is my understanding that guns were commonly referred to as "brass" when they were actually made of bronze. (2) During the American Civil War, the use of railroads, navigable rivers, and saltwater transport to supply armies was crucial. Only raiding forces and small armies (~10,000) could operate in areas without ports, rivers, or rail lines (Trans-Mississippi and East Tennessee). Djmaschek (talk) 22:40, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
GAN
Don't forget about the Dornier Do Y review. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Battle of Loano
I have assessed the article as B. I think I did not use the reply button so you may not have received a notice. Donner60 (talk) 05:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)