User talk:Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento! Thank you for your contributions. I am Pigsonthewing and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pigsonthewing, Thanks for your comments. Please, may you help me on inproving our ETOPIA project wikipage? Actually one member of our team created that article page but it seems that is required lots of fixing and also I would suggest to changing it into wikiproject. I already provided some corrections but it needs to be turned into something like this [[1]]. I would appreciate if you could give me some tips and suggestions in how I would improve it.Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 1292simon (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still editing[edit]

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. This is regarding European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications.

1292simon (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 1292simon, some modifications have been done to European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications:

I declared that I have a COI by inserting the "Disclosure" section at my page;
All sources were checked;
All promotional tone writing found were rewritten in aforementioned way or removed;
All URL's inside the article were moved to external links or references;
It was provided a review on the content in order to avoid plagiarism also to comply with the owner's copyright.

Please, is it possible to turn the article, into a wikiproject such as [[2]]? Actually it should have been done since the creation of the project page, once it regards an working project. In addition, would it be possible to change the wikiproject title to "ETOPIA - European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications"? Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento (talk) 09:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Douglas. Thankyou for creating the disclosure section on your User page, that is a good step in the right direction. Sorry, I don't know how to turn an article into a WikiProject, perhaps the folks at the WP:TEAHOUSE might be able to help with that question. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Douglas Aguiar do Nascimento! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help on creating Wikiproject, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]