User talk:Dzjabito

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 23:12, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. El_C 23:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Reiner Gavriel[edit]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Reiner Gavriel, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Reiner Gavriel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Reiner Gavriel during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 07:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dzjabito (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of Dzurdzuketi, check the IPs and other logs. Why do I have to wait 2 months before anyone looks at my appeal. This is really frustrating, especially when the real violator is not being punished @reiner gavriel, which I have reported.

Decline reason:

Even if you're not a sock, which I find rather hard to believe, your edits prior to being blocked suggest that you're WP:NOTHERE _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dzjabito (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do you have teams that actually investigate sockpuppets, because if you do have such people. Please them check it out. One can't simply ban someone based on his assumptions or "beliefs". I have contributed to several pages and even created a separate page for the current head of Ingushetia - Mahmud-Ali Kalimatov. My question for you admins: why am I being banned and not the vandaliser Reiner Gavriel, who has vandalised multiple pages (not only Ingush People) page and several other people have complained about him on other talk pages. Why is this being ignored?

Decline reason:

Your request should only focus on your actions and not that of others. I concur with Rosguill above; even if you are not a sock(which I doubt), you are clearly WP:NOTHERE. If our beliefs, which we certainly can act upon based on what we see, are incorrect, you need to explain why. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion[edit]

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: This user has sought unblocking via UTRS. The review is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editor interaction report --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Special:permalink/975034666#Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Reiner Gavriel is the relevant ANI thread. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]