User talk:Eddiedeedeedee

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Harry Potter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the words of the wonderful Jim Carrey, alrighty then Eddiedeedeedee (talk) 02:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:J. K. Rowling, you may be blocked from editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooohh iVe beEn BlOckEd Oh nO wHaT wiLL I EveR dO Eddiedeedeedee (talk) 02:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nO wHaT wiLL I EveR dO

Answer: Something else. Seriously, get a hobby that 1) you enjoy, 2) doesn't annoy other people, and 3) ideally, makes the world a better place. Trolling Wikipedia may be #1 but it's very much not #2 or #3.

If and when you decide you are here to build an encyclopedia read WP:Standard offer. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I admit that was immature of me but you genuinely have no right involving yourself in this discussion and there’s not really much room for a hobby when your stuck at home with nothing to do thanks Eddiedeedeedee (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I just want to reply in regards to your comment on my teahouse post, I plan on becoming a prefect in my last year of school which is next year and that gives me the opportunity to help the first years adjust to a new school and there is no youth sports or summer camp for me to help at thanks Eddiedeedeedee (talk) 02:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eddiedeedeedee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m just a kid and I was just messing around for a bit and got out of hand please forgive me I won’t vandalise again I’m actually enjoying discussing potential life goals and achievements in Teahouse and would like to be able to continue editing that post to reply to others that have responded to my query Eddiedeedeedee (talk) 02:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I suggest you come back in a couple of years when you've matured a bit. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked for personal attacks. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 21:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.