User talk:Emmet147

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


January 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to RedLetterMedia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: RedLetterMedia was changed by Emmet147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896273 on 2018-01-09T23:06:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sex assignment have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. You may find it useful to discuss the changes you want to make on the article's talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Wikipedia:Help desk. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chaos Walking (film), you may be blocked from editing. Bellezzasolo Discuss 23:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Eggishorn. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emmet147 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am truly sorry for my disturbances to your website. Over time I have learned slowly to respect it and only contribute useful information. I hope you see the sincerity in my words and unblock me from editing pages and if you don't, I will hang myself.

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQLQuery me! 23:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm going to assume you were referring to WP:ROPE. Edits such as this, this, this, and this do not inspire confidence. If unblocked, what sorts of specific contributions will you make? GABgab 23:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emmet147 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I hope to make contributions to the webpages of youtube channels such as Screen Junkies and Ralph Sepe Jr.. I know a lot about these things and I would like to update their pages with information such as subscriber counts, list of episodes, etc. I know my previous list of contributions may not inspire confidence, but I promise I won't do anything like that again. ( I won't actually hang myself by the way, it's just a joke).

Decline reason:

Talkpage access revoked (See deleted revisions), and contacted WMF em team SQLQuery me! 00:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would avoid making jokes such as "if you don't, I'll hang myself". In text, we can't tell if you're joking, or have an immediate need for emergency services - and will typically err on the side of caution in these matters. SQLQuery me! 23:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]