User talk:Eric.Jason.Cross

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Gerardo Martino. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mattythewhite (talk) 01:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ciaran O'Brien[edit]

Thanks for adding the picture to the Ciaran O'Brien article recently. Is it accurate in that they spelled his last name wrong? GauchoDude (talk) 20:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC) Actually, I hadn't noticed the spelling difference until you pointed that out. I was going through some old Silverbacks photos of mine, and this was the only one I had of him showing his name. So I don't know if it was a one-time thing, or all season long. Eric.Jason.Cross (talk) 01:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fernando Meza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chili. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Faction (supporters' group) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to The Faction (supporters' group). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resurgence (supporters' group) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Resurgence (supporters' group). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Footie Mob moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Footie Mob. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Terminus Legion moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Terminus Legion. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terminus Legion (July 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of the sources are not reliable (blogs, fan sites) or are brief mentions or largely rely on what those affiliated with the group say. The The New York Times article is the best source provided but that alone is not enough and a large portion of it relies on what those affiliated say.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terminus Legion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resurgence (supporters' group) (July 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Resurgence (supporters' group) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Faction (supporters' group) (July 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Faction (supporters' group) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 13:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Footie Mob (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are either primary or passing mentions of the subject. WABE source is broken.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Footie Mob and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 00:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Terminus Legion[edit]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terminus Legion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Resurgence (supporters' group)[edit]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Resurgence (supporters' group), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Faction (supporters' group)[edit]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Faction (supporters' group), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Footie Mob[edit]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Footie Mob, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Footie Mob[edit]

Hello, Eric.Jason.Cross. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Footie Mob".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]