User talk:EsotericJoe

EsotericJoe, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi EsotericJoe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Links that don't work[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Tyson Fury. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for your advice.--EsotericJoe (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Nicholas Winton does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hermione Harvey has been accepted[edit]

Hermione Harvey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 20:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hermione Farthingale (May 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NACTOR for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft does not show that the subject satisfies acting notability, which involves multiple significant roles. The filmography has two listed films, and in neither of them does she have a listed role, let alone a significant role. If the subject does satisfy acting notability, please explain on the talk page of this draft when resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hermione Farthingale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hermione Farthingale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hermione Ruck Keene for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermione Ruck Keene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Ruck Keene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   Kadzi   (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hermione Plumptre for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermione Plumptre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Plumptre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi (Talk to me!) 02:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi EsotericJoe! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Has my draft been improved enough?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hermione Farthingale (June 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Life on Mars (song). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not seeing independent notability for her. Comparable to Sharona in My Sharona

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hermione Farthingale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hermione Farthingale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Racial antisemitism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Eternal Jew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. El_C 12:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. KyleJoan^talk 10:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleKoan: Oh, please, where is the original research? Cheryl Tweedy/Cheryl Cole was more commonly known as the latter during her time as a member of Girls Aloud. Don’t make up lies about me. EsotericJoe (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EsotericJoe: You have my message confused with El_C's. KyleJoan^talk 11:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do apologise. EsotericJoe (talk) 11:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Galland[edit]

Please read the bibliography. The source is there. Dapi89 (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prince[edit]

In addition to the reason I give, if we go by your version, he goes down to 7th position alphabetically. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Clarityfiend: Why does he have to be 7th alphabetically? Very few of the people on the list are ordered alphabetically. Also, I think most people are familiar with the surnames of very famous people who are known simply by their first names.--EsotericJoe (talk) 06:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? They're all in alphabetical order by last name, which is SOP. Hmmm ... Prince Udaya Priyantha may or may not be in the proper order; I'm not familiar with Sri Lankan naming. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. Sorry, I hadn’t looked at the page for a while.--EsotericJoe (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caleb Maupin[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Caleb Maupin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caleb Maupin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caleb Maupin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Maupin (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 18:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hi EsotericJoe! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to James Connolly, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 09:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FDW777: Well, considering Connolly is listed on the Marxist bibliography and the Marxist sidebar is included in his article, I don’t really see the issue.--EsotericJoe (talk) 10:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content FDW777 (talk) 10:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So despite the two facts I’ve just mentioned, are you seriously telling me that he was not an Irish Marxist? You can’t be serious!--EsotericJoe (talk) 10:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I said anything of the kind. FDW777 (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is your problem then?--EsotericJoe (talk) 12:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you to my original message at 09:45, and the truncated version of it specifically detailing the problem at 10:36. FDW777 (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FDW777: Well, I cant help but think that you’re making a mountain out of a molehill. Why do you object to the category being included in the article? I’ve given you two reasons why I think the category should be included.--EsotericJoe (talk) 09:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because it wasn't supported by the article's verifiable content. Which word(s) from the sentence don't you understand? FDW777 (talk) 12:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For similar reasons information doesn't go in the lead unless it's covered in the rest of the article. FDW777 (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FDW777: We can discuss it on the James Connolly’s talk page because quite frankly this is just getting ridiculous.--EsotericJoe (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Diannaa (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EsotericJoe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am shocked to have been banned as a sockpuppet. I apologise if I have edited some articles which a banned user edited, but I am not a sockpuppet. Can anyone help me please? Thank you.EsotericJoe (talk) 7:17 pm, 16 August 2020, Sunday (22 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: user has not responded to inquiry below in 2 weeks. only (talk) 02:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What's your relationship to User talk:Madonna The Queen. PhilKnight (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hermione Byrt moved to draftspace[edit]

No indication of independent notability, and concomittant lack of usable references. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hermione Johnson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermione Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hermione Thompson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermione Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hermione Byrt[edit]

Hello, EsotericJoe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hermione Byrt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hermione Byrt[edit]

Hello, EsotericJoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hermione Byrt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hermione Farthingale[edit]

Hello, EsotericJoe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hermione Farthingale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hermione Farthingale[edit]

Hello, EsotericJoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hermione Farthingale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]