User talk:Evsubman
|
A lengthy welcome[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.
If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 01:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rose Red (miniseries), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. This was a series of edits that resulted in breaking the infobox template. Try using "preview" before saving your edits, or refer to the Template:Infobox television docs, or ask for help. Also, the edit included a wikilink for a link that was already included in the preceding paragraph, refer to MOS:DUPLINK ButlerBlog (talk) 22:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cult films: E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Harling. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
April 2023[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Shining (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Additionally, stop leaving deceptive edit summaries. When you add or change content, it is deceptive to leave the edit summary "added link" or "fixed typ0". Please stop. Sundayclose (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of cult films: T. Sundayclose (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
STOP using deceptive edit summaries[edit]
This is not "adding links". Do this again and you will lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
fix a page[edit]
Hi Wikipedia,Can you please fix the Rose Red Miniseries page & put it back to its original format. Thanks!!! I really appreciate it!!! Evsubman (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
August 2023[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Shining (film). Sundayclose (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Rose Red (miniseries) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Shining (miniseries). CodeTalker (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 18:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Shining (film). Sundayclose (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)