User talk:Feminist/Archive 15

DYK for Designed by Apple in California[edit]

On 22 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Designed by Apple in California, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Designed by Apple in California was dedicated to Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Jobs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Designed by Apple in California. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Saugat Bista in Love You Baba[edit]

Hello, I successfully merged Saugat Bista to Love You Baba. But would you please take look at the destination page to make sure everything is okay, and that I didnt goof-up somewhere in the process? Thanks for your guidance. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thank you
Apart from content (copy-editing?), were there any mistakes on technical grounds?
I am still learning :-D —usernamekiran (talk) 13:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, all of the content in the director article has already been mentioned in the film article, so a merger is not really required. The director article could have been converted to a redirect immediately. f eminist 13:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So there were no mistakes on technical terms? PS: kindly use {{reply to|username}} if you communicate with me anywhere on wikipedia —usernamekiran (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New requested move[edit]

Have you seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Incorporation_of_Tibet_into_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China#Requested_move_13_March_2017 this new requested moveA ri gi bod (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:The Red Pill.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Red Pill.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

°°^°°[edit]

Hi @Feminist:

Neutral point of view...? You do know that some situations call for taking a side, and they aren't rare at all.😶😁 BulbAtop (talk) 21:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

DYK for Loser.com[edit]

On 30 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loser.com, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Loser.com used to redirect at different times to Kanye West's and Donald Trump's Wikipedia entries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Loser.com. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Loser.com), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 01:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaand[edit]

You broke Recent Changes... TimothyJosephWood 15:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm so what should I do, spread out their creation? Many articles of actors and filmmakers don't have separate filmography articles so these redirects are useful, but... f e minist 16:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Probably isn't any obvious solution. I'm not really complaining. Although... it would be handy to have an "Ignore AWB" option on these fancy new beta tools. TimothyJosephWood 16:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you really didn't learn from when you did this last year did you? Mass redirect creation needs to be handled though a bot, and be approved by WP:BRFA. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Nowhere comparable. feminist 00:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's exactly the same situation. You're mass creating redirects without consensus again. Would you like ANI to verify this? -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Whatever. Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SSTbot 3 f e minist 01:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reem_(singer)[edit]

[1] is certainly not a clear outcome and is probably a bad choice for a NAC. Could you please reopen it and let an admin close it? Hobit (talk) 03:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that it isn't a clear outcome, but sure. f e minist 03:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! We may well end up in the same place, but I think there is a lot going on here. Hobit (talk) 03:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Demolay Washington[edit]

I dispute the consensus as redirect. It should have been delete and redirect as none of the content was salvagable. Please void your close and let an admin do this one. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, although I think another admin would also close this as redirect and not D&R. f e minist 00:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D&R it was... but I looked through your recent closes and didnt see any issues whatsoever. Its simply that this was a very tricky one and the d&r outcome is obviously reserved for admins. -Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, two "delete" votes that were explicitly against a redirect were added after I reversed my closure. f e minist 16:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello Feminist,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 816 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move Page[edit]

Reva Institute of Technology and Management → Reva University – Adhering to the guidelines of the page/topic name we need to change it to Reva University as the subject of the article has changed its name and the new name has come into majority use. Unable to change the subject article because the article already exist and redirected to the current article name. Requires to reverse the redirection and use Reva University as a article title. www.reva.edu.in Kindly do the needful. Akshay1114 (talk) 08:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Try WP:RM if you need to. I wouldn't bet on it. f e minist 10:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki![edit]

Hello, Feminist, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Vanamonde (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Rename bot account[edit]

You have a current request for bot approval at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SSTbot 3. I suggest that you request the bot account to be renamed to "Feministbot" or "FeministBot" to correspond to your current username. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will consider it. f e minist 16:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TFD closes[edit]

You're off by a day, friend. May 22 doesn't roll over until tomorrow. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion process states Discussions are usually closed after seven days (168 hours). Or is it still better to wait until the next day? f e minist 18:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I generally wait until I see discussions in Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Old unclosed discussions. The "day" rolls over at midnight UTC, so there can be a bit of fudging as far as the exact hours go. You're just the third person I've seen in two days that is closing discussions early, so I've been notifying all parties about it. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is, I don't consider closing discussions that have been opened for more than 168 hours as early. f e minist 01:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AXN Pakistan[edit]

You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AXN Pakistan as "redirect", but AXN Pakistan was not actually redirected because the target you chose is the same as the article you would redirect. The article should be redirected to AXN (India). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. f e minist 10:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS Tag Team Championship[edit]

I wonder whether it was the right idea to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS Tag Team Championship as "merge to SAS Wrestling" given that the SAS Wrestling article doesn't exist. (It was a redirect to a page that has since been deleted, and the redirect itself has been deleted.) Did you mean to move the article to SAS Wrestling instead? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's funny, when I closed that AfD discussion I don't remember seeing an AfD tag on SAS Wrestling. Either I was wrong and that article was indeed nominated for deletion (in this case I am happy to reverse my closure), or Jo-Jo Eumerus deleted an incorrect article. f e minist 01:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SAS Wrestling had been a redirect to Real Quality Wrestling since 2009, but the latter was deleted yesterday via AFD. You'll probably have to reverse your close if only because the only real option from here is to close as "delete". Primefac (talk) 01:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

I see, thanks. I have reversed my closure. f e minist 02:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Fine Young Capitalists good article re-assessment[edit]

The Fine Young Capitalists, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PeterTheFourth (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Southern Airways Express logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Southern Airways Express logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbie Hanna[edit]

You closed this AfD as userfy. Its been moved back into the main space without changes. Just giving you a heads up. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And... moved back. I'll keep an eye on it. Primefac (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Thanks, Primefac! I almost moved it myself but wanted to give Feminist a heads up. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Witness (Katy Perry album)[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Witness (Katy Perry album) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BAGBot: Your bot request SSTbot 3[edit]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SSTbot 3 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_May_14#Template:USdict deletion review[edit]

The US dictionary template was deleted after discussion by only 4 editors even though it fills an important niche since hundreds of millions of English-speakers have grown up with it. I suspect those editors involved may have little anglospheric experience outside the United Kingdom.

I teach English and have worked in dozens of primary and secondary schools in Australia and in dozens of elementary, middle, and high schools in the USA; I have even taught in cued speech. None of these schools taught English pronunciation with the IPA; they all used the short vowels ă, ĕ, ĭ, ŏ, ŭ, o͝o, and ə for æ, ɛ, ɪ, ɒ, ʌ, ʊ, and ə; the long vowels ā, ē, ī, ō, and o͞o for eɪ, iː, aɪ, oʊ, and uː; the digraphs ah, ar, aw, er, ow, and oy, for ɑː, ɑːɹ, ɔː, əɹ, aʊ, and ɔɪ; and the digraphs ch, dh, kh, sh, th, wh, zh, and ng for tʃ, ð, x, ʃ, θ, hw, ʒ, and ŋ. The relationship between short vowels and long vowels is crucial to teaching emerging phonics and this is done naturally with the breve ◌̆ for short vowels and the macron ◌̄ for long vowels. The only new character a student must learn is the schwa ə. This breve and macron system is employed in museums, zoos, dictionaries, and teaching aids across Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the USA.

Could you please reconsider the deletion? Thecurran (talk) 04:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one who closed the discussion. You will have to discuss with the closing admin first. f e minist 05:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who did? Thecurran (talk) 07:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, looked at the wrong discussion. You would have to go through the WP:DRV process, as there was clear consensus at the discussion that the template should be deleted. f e minist 10:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camelcamelcamel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camelcamelcamel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 法國醫院[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 法國醫院, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Citobun (talk) 15:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of cover photo of Sam Hunt's single "Make You Miss Me"[edit]

Can you help me to get a cover photo of Sam Hunt's single "Make You Miss Me" please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.228.188 (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Witness (Katy Perry album)[edit]

On 28 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Witness (Katy Perry album), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that ticket purchases for Witness: The Tour will include copies of Katy Perry's album Witness? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Witness (Katy Perry album). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Movement Strategy reminder[edit]

Hi. You contributed in a previous part of the discussion, so this is just a reminder to you (and any interested talkpagewatchers), that it's the second week of our Movement Strategy Cycle 3 discussion. There's a new topic each week in July, and this week's is: How could we capture the sum of all knowledge when much of it cannot be verified in traditional ways? You can see more details, and suggest solutions or respond to other people's thoughts (from this week and last week) at Wikipedia:Wikimedia Strategy 2017. You can also read a summary of discussions that took place in the past week. Cheers. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 03:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Regarding closure of Lechmi[edit]

Hi, Feminist, I see that you closed the deletion discussion for the article on Lechmi as "No consensus". I don't disagree that the discussion lacked consensus, I think it lacked a sufficient number of participants to have had any meaningful consensus reached, and I wanted to bring it to deletion review— can I get your thoughts on that? Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 21:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True. It failed to reach a meaningful consensus after two relists, so a "no consensus" close is appropriate. f e minist 03:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move review for Damn (Kendrick Lamar album)[edit]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curious[edit]

Hello, Feminist, just curious as to why you routed The Earl of Wessex, HRH The Earl of Wessex and Earl and Countess of Wessex to Duke of Gloucester, where the redirects are not mentioned, rather than to the suggested Earl of Wessex article? Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 16:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. That was a careless mistake, thanks. f e minist 17:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, fact is, you remind me of me!

Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 14:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TFYC Indiegogo hacked.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TFYC Indiegogo hacked.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfD closure on 'Murica[edit]

Hello again. I saw that you closed Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 6#'Murica as redirecting 'Murica to List of U.S. nicknames. However, the target article is now PRODded for violating WP:IINFO. What will you do about the redirect page? --George Ho (talk) 13:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the target article is deleted, the redirect will also be deleted per WP:G8. For now no action is necessary. f e minist 14:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... ... You're right. If they try to search it if deleted, at least we have sister projects snippets to show them results (unless opted-out via user preferences). --George Ho (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]