User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 95

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Walton (Indiana) has been accepted

Charles A. Walton (Indiana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Denver Star has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Denver Star. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Turnverein Building has been accepted

Turnverein Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Storchy (talk) 10:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John A. Moss (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John A. Moss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 03:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Webb Curtis (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Webb Curtis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 03:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauranett Lee (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lauranett Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 03:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Douglas Price (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Douglas Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Meets GNG for having very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Resubmitted. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidency of Calvin Coolidge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edwin Denby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Fixed be User:Rodw. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eustace Edward Green (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eustace Edward Green and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Reginald Margetson (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Reginald Margetson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilbert C. Harris (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilbert C. Harris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles William Hubner has been accepted

Charles William Hubner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 12:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Reginald Margetson has been accepted

George Reginald Margetson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashmun has been accepted

Ashmun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 18:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Parish Ashmun has been accepted

George Parish Ashmun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 18:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tillery, North Carolina (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tillery, North Carolina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriel L. Jones has been accepted

Gabriel L. Jones, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eustace Edward Green has been accepted

Eustace Edward Green, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tillery, North Carolina has been accepted

Tillery, North Carolina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anduril Industries

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anduril Industries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy,

While you made the first edit to this page, it looks like it was Zetana who really created most of this draft article. Twinkle just looks for the first editor though, and that was you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmage Walls has been accepted

Carmage Walls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James S. Coleman (Alabama judge) has been accepted

James S. Coleman (Alabama judge), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David T. Warner (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David T. Warner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Gray (North Carolina politician) has been accepted

Robert Gray (North Carolina politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Montgomery has been accepted

Jacob Montgomery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Topic ban violations

Please be more careful. Both last week and today, I moved an article to draft space after you created it in the main namespace, which you aren't allowed to do. You were last blocked for this in August but seem to restart old habits. Fram (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Which articles? I am not perfect but if I catch that I have misplaced an article creation I move it back to draftspace. I apologize for any mistakes I've made. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Oak Park Historic District (Arden, North Carolina) just now, and Draft:George W. Moore and Ella Sheppard Moore one week ago. Fram (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Roger. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Hicks (North Carolina politician) has been accepted

Alexander Hicks (North Carolina politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Harris Chappell (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Harris Chappell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Dillon Danis

I have added information to the Danis article. I saw your interest as well and if you would be so kind to add any additional info you would like and submit it please. Thanks Blahwikiblah (talk) 18:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alabama State Sovereignty Commission has been accepted

Alabama State Sovereignty Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 21:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Jenner Warren has been accepted

Edward Jenner Warren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

I'd appreciate if you could set up the redirects you mention at the top of the article, unless that would be in violation of the topic ban? I don't recall the details, but feel free to ping me about them if you can't yourself. Rusalkii (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Always happy to do it. Thanks. I was about to set up the links even before I saw your message. I always try to fix up my approved drafts as needed. Any chance you could review Draft:Alabama State Sovereignty Commission and Draft:Charles William Anderson User:Rusalkii? They are both pretty important subjects and not having thek in mainspace has made other work more time consuming and complicated. Thanks for your great efforts. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:43, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

I liked Alabama State Sovereignty Commission, an interesting and unfortunate piece of history. Thank you for your work on it! I'll leave the Anderson article to others for now. Rusalkii (talk) 21:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clifton Conference (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clifton Conference and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hiram Stilley has been accepted

Hiram Stilley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 06:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles W. Anderson Jr. has been accepted

Charles W. Anderson Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry B. Eaton has been accepted

Harry B. Eaton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurice L. Malone has been accepted

Maurice L. Malone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Cheers to you. So happy to see Alabama State Sovereignty Commission is in the article space now, keep up the good work! PigeonChickenFish (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks user:PigeonChickenFish. Thanks to you for all your great work! Hoping for a very Happy Holiday season to you and yours. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles William Anderson has been accepted

Charles William Anderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for all your great work User:KylieTastic!!! This one needs a lot of expansion but it's a start. Interesting guy. Some of the letters detailing his political activities and organizing is on the talk page. Thanks again. Happy Holidays. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I didn't have the energy left today to do my normal source hunt and expansion as I'm still recovering from two weeks of fever and I was getting confused by all the other Charles William Anderson's, but I agree an interesting subject and I'm sure there is a lot more to be added. It was good enough to get out as I wasn't sure I'd find time to get back to it, hopefully some others will pick it up and improve. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Eaton (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry Eaton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

User:Timtrent what is an eventual name? I'm open to handling disambig differently but Harry Eaton currently redirect to marginally notable Ronald Eaton. I guess I can change the target to Harry B. Eaton and add a disambig hatnote there. On the other hand the painter seems pretty notable and went by C. Harry Eaton. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Harry Eaton (disambiguation), perhaps? I mean the name it will, in due course, be accepted as 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Harry Eaton (legislator) seems the best, if he wasn't normally known as Harry B. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

His article is submitted for the name Harry B. Eaton. Draft:Harry Eaton is submitted as a disambig page. I don't knownwhy the disambig page would be at (disambiguation). If there isn't to be a disambig page then I will just change the redirect to Harry B. and add a hatnoted to Ronald Eaton, the current redirect. I don't know why this needs to be so complicated. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Washington Pope

Hey, I tried to finish off African-American_officeholders_during_and_following_the_Reconstruction_era#Florida_State_Senate - I started Draft:Washington Pope but after an hour and a half of looking I can find nothing more than statements that he served. If you can find anything then please add, if not I may just publish as is. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

User:KylieTastic I thought there might be some coverage in this book but it doesn't appear so. I will check my hard copy when I locate it.. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

• Hi, I have a copy of Freedom's Lawmakers and do use it to start a new article from, unfortunately for Pope it is just 2 lines "Pope, Washington (dates unknown) Served as county commissioner, Jackson County, Florida 1870-73, and in state Senate, 1873-76." and that's all! For once Eric has let us down. The trouble with a newspapers search is Washington and Pope are common words so a huge number of false hits. floridamemory also did not help for once, just this basic listing, and another listing in "The People of Lawmaking in Florida 1822 – 2019" that I used. One elusive senator! KylieTastic (talk) 17:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry User:KylieTastic, I posted the wrong link. this is the book I meant to post. Canter Brown Jr.'s. Florida was a bit of a backwater. I don't think the early papers covering these subjects have been digitized and I don't know how many have been preserved. Hopefully someday soon we'll get there. :) FloridaArmy (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

As your probably know, Foner's Freedom's Lawmakers leaves out a tremendous number from various states. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I will do some digging in Newspapers. S0091 (talk) 17:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks FloridaArmy, at least that book gave a YOB and farmer, and a third source which also will help fend of any deletionists - and thanks S0091. Cheers KylieTastic (talk)

One other source to check for this and other similar subjects would be Joe M. Richardson's The Negro in the Reconstruction of Florida, 1865-1877 Florida State University (1965) which appears to have been reissued (revised and updated?) as African Americans in the Reconstruction of Florida, 1865-1877 University of Alabama Press (2008). No idea if either version is online or accessible online. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I did not find anything in Newspapers, or NewspaperArchive. Given he was in the Florida panhandle thought there might be something in Alabama or Georgia, but nothing. I came across these in Google Books: this has a possible photo (not helpful for the article but interesting to see a photo) and this which states he was "the first Democratic representative in the general assembly from Jackson County, following military government in 1867...". I don't know what "military government" really means. FA, do you have any clue? S0091 (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Military government refers to Union Army officials and federal officials more generally. There was a transition back to state sovereignty and voting rights for X Confederates (who pretty uniformly were Democrats). The photo is interesting. The original should be accessible from the Florida Archives? Is it on Wikipedia Commons? I notice the second source, from 1950, identifies a fellow senator as "Negro" but not Pope. It's certainly noteworthy if he was a Democrat. 21:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I found nothing in the Internet Archive except the already referenced Florida's Black Legislators, nothing at Newspapers.com (which does not appear to have indexed Florida at all during the relevant years), and nothing through the Wikipedia Library. BD2412 T 21:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

• The photo is also (fuller version) here. I didn't see it on Wikipedia Commons but searching there can be flukey. Florida Memory is given as the source which is the state archive. The photo is also here in another version. If he were a Democrat I don't onow why he would be amongst that group. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• It's worth noting that abbreviations were often used in 19th century. W. Pope? FloridaArmy (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

  I did look for W. Pope but did not find anything that I could concretely identify as the same person (i.e. nothing about a politician, etc.). S0091 (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: River Junction, Florida has been accepted

River Junction, Florida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Newton Amos Blitch has been accepted

Newton Amos Blitch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Douglas Price (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Douglas Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Douglas Price has been accepted

Alfred Douglas Price, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merline Pitre has been accepted

Merline Pitre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 09:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joyce Lawrence (politician) has been accepted

Joyce Lawrence (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

• Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gus Weinberg

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gus Weinberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gus Weinberg has been accepted

Gus Weinberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dred Wimberly has been accepted

Dred Wimberly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dred Wimberly (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dred Wimberly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Blaze Wolf per WP:NPOL, they are notable and is one of the exceptions to GNG. S0091 (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I see that, however I do not feel comfortable accepting this article since there's practically nothing in it. I understand that if an article has a greater than 50% chance of surviving a deletion discussion then it can be approved via AFC, however there's practically nothing to this article other than "he was a politician and has a historical marker in some random town". ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Also, in what you linked I'm not seeing anything that says it's an exception to GNG ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:35, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

You are right, it does not explicitly say it is an exception but from an AfD perspective they are. See Veo Easley, Gilbert F. Smith, Herman B. DeCell and J. P. Scales for other examples, all which also passed NPP. I understand you may not be comfortable accepting these so I suggest skipping them rather than declining because FA will simply resubmit them. S0091 (talk) 20:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

To my knowledge specific notability criteria like this are often simply additions to GNG and they still need to qualify as notable per GNG. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

See below. FA already resubmitted and it was accepted. You will the see the same theme above in others that were declined. S0091 (talk) 20:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

See also WP:POLOUTCOMES. To be clear, I am not chastising you for declining or anything like that so I hope you are not taking it that way. I am glad you are now a AfC reviewer (see you around Teahouse, etc.) and think you will do an excellent job. S0091 (talk) 21:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I would just add that he served in the North Carolina House and Senate. He was African American. And serving in the state senate in 1889 he would have been one of the last African Americans to hold state office before the Jim Crow era. Original research of course but there are good reasons to include state legislators especially African Americans on Wikipedia. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

None of that means anything to me. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Understood. Differences of opinion and different perspectives are part of editing. Thank you for your good efforts and take care. I do hope you might consider the consensus for including these subjects but I respect you will make your own judgments. Thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaac Alston has been accepted

Isaac Alston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 05:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Daniel Beittel has been accepted

Adam Daniel Beittel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Adam Daniel Beittel

See source 4. He was also fired from Talladega College under similar circumstances as Tougaloo College. Wow! S0091 (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

User:Star Mississippi this subject might interest you. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

I've started expanding the article but appreciate any help. I'm not the best the writer. :( S0091 (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @FloridaArmy. Looking into this now. Star Mississippi 20:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Check out source 7, "Commission falsely connected Tougaloo head to communism" (make sure to look at the correct article because there are two). I will continue to expand but went ahead and accepted because it needs to be out of draft. As always, thanks FA for bringing to these topics to light. S0091 (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

If you could add a bit on this to the Tougaloo College and Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission entries it would help tie it all together. Pretty nasty stuff. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: W. T. J. Hayes has been accepted

W. T. J. Hayes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Cuffie Mayo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cuffie Mayo. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John S. W. Eagles has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John S. W. Eagles. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harrison Creek (disambiguation) has been accepted

Harrison Creek (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagleash (talk) 02:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Sinclair Leary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Wagner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Lloyd has been accepted

Alfred Lloyd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:45, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Caucasian (newspaper) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Caucasian (newspaper). Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Williams Thorne has been accepted

J. Williams Thorne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 04:08, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanson Truman Hughes has been accepted

Hanson Truman Hughes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī (talk) 08:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for creating the article @FloridaArmy. Please improve the cats. I have also created the redirects as requested. It would be very good if you include his birth and death year at the least. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indigo Traveller has been accepted

Indigo Traveller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 09:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lester Vonderachmidt has been accepted

Lester Vonderachmidt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Zoe Vrakatitsis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zoe Vrakatitsis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)