User talk:Frick.Photoarchive

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Frick.Photoarchive/sandbox (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frick.Photoarchive/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC John Thomas Peele was accepted[edit]

John Thomas Peele, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC David Brown (British artist) was accepted[edit]

David Brown (British artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BethNaught (talk) 10:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anne Hall[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Anne Hall, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.internetantiquegazette.com/paintings/2001_hall_ann_american_artist/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ann Hall - Citation templates.[edit]

Hi Lisa,

I just noticed you managed to move Draft:Ann Hall to its new title - well done! Don't worry about not finding that option; after a while you get used to using the Mediawiki software that powers Wikipedia, but it is pretty much a maze for everyone who first tries to use it.

Now, i didn't just decide to drop by for some idle chatter. I had a look at the Draft:Ann Hall article, and i noticed you are using a lot of book references which is great. One thing i equally note is that you add them between barebone <ref></ref> tags. There is nothing wrong with that, but i am guessing that after the 5th or so reference formatting them becomes tiresome and tedious. There is actually a more convenient way to cite a book or a webpage. If you edit the Draft:Ann Hall article (or any other page) you should see the word "Cite" to the right in the edit menu. If you click that button a menu should appear, with on the left side a dropdown stating "Templates". Click that one and select "Cite book" from the list. You will now see a popup that can be filled in with the reference details.

Now here is the handy trick. You can fill in the ISBN field and press the looking glass after it to have the template auto-fill itself with all the known book details. For example, the "American Women Artists: From the Early Indian Times to the Present" you cited had ISBN "9780816185351". Just fill that in and press the looking glass and presto, you got a filled in citation. All you need to do is add the page number, click the calendar icon next to "Access Date" and add a "Ref Name" (A name that identifies a specific reference).

It is also possible to use the same trick using a Google Books URL, though this only works if you use the Monobook skin for Wikipedia. Under the Monobook skin the option exists to paste a Google books URL, followed by a click on an icon that fetches the books data. It works wonders for books that are availible on Google Books yet lack an ISBN number. (To explain: Monobook used to be the default layout for Wikipedia until 2010. After that it was replaced by the "Vector" skin, the layout you currently see. While Monobook is less fancy, reader friendly and feels a tad outdated it is still in very common use due to people being used to it and due to it supporting a few features not available in the new skin).

Well, that is a whole lot of chatter from me i suppose. To give an example of the result i took the liberty to change the first two references on your draft into citations. I hope that trick proves to be useful! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 23:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 07:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heya![edit]

Hi Lisa,

Just a quick message to explain the message above – once you've changed your username, you'll be good to go again! One of the reasons we have individual usernames is so that you can be properly credited for your contributions.

I've had a gander at your articles and they look very good – well written, constructed and referenced. The help desk is good, but you might also like to check out the Teahouse, which has a handful of mentors and a more relaxed feel to it. Anyway, thanks for the articles and hope you enjoy editing in the future! Brammers (talk/c) 12:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked to allow the user to change their name 5 albert square (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Frick.Photoarchive! Thank you for your contributions. I am 5 albert square and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! 5 albert square (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ann Hall concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ann Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ann Hall (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ann Hall instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ann Hall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Frick.Photoarchive, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ann Hall concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ann Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ann Hall[edit]

Hello, Frick.Photoarchive. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ann Hall".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]