User talk:GMH Melbourne/Archive 2021

2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

Welcome[edit]

G'day GA Melbourne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 03:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and thank you for the lamingtons GA Melbourne (talk) 03:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jahan Kalantar (lawyer) (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jahan Kalantar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jahan Kalantar (lawyer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GA Melbourne! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I will find more sources and resubmit a better quality article GA Melbourne (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2021

Your submission at Articles for creation: Census and Statistics Act 1905 has been accepted[edit]

Census and Statistics Act 1905, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Talk:Underbelly (series 1)[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you recently edited Talk:Underbelly (series 1) and removed the WikiProject banners for both the Crime and Television WikiProject banners, saying they were redundant. This is not the case. The Crime and Television parameters in the Australian WikiProject produce assessment data for WikiProject Australian crime and WikiProject Australian television respectively. These projects are really "task forces" of WikiProject Australia. However, Crime and Television WikiProjects are worldwide projects are both separate and different from WikiProject Australia. These other banners and are NOT redundant, as they apply to their respective worldwide WikiProjects. Those WikiProjects are distinctly separate assessments to Australian Crime and Australian Television. To save you the trouble, I have put the Crime and Television WikiProject banners back. I know this may seem odd to do things, especially to someone so new to Wikipedia, but it is the way the WikiProject banners work currently. If you think things could be improved, perhaps you could raise the issue with the Version 1.0 Editorial Team - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a new editor, it is well worth knowing that project tags are never redundant - unless they are wrong outright. Which what you removed is not the case... There is a whole side of the Austrayian project that many editors do not touch - which is the talk page and project tags. It is a vital area of assessment -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment - and just a friendly note - many aspects of the oz project do go quiet, and under attended over time - it is always worth looking at article/item last edited date in the history - it does give you an idea if an editor has been anywhere near there in recent times- there can be also the possibility that some items actually drop of watch lists - and there can be black holes where some new editors do get lost - simply because of nobody anywhere near the item either editing or watching... every edit is traceable/findable - so when the assertion as he is a household name in VIC and is very well known in the legal field is made - some editors crazy flashing lights go wild - such assertions on/in wikipedia are WP:OR - unless a WP:RS is provided - specially WP:BLP - it is a case of unless backed up - better left out - and as to the relative importance aka notability - we then go back to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment Attrition and reverse engineering are your best guides, it takes x number of years to get a law degree, similarly here it takes x number of edits to get a hange of things and it is always worth a good look into articles as they exist, can help very much to understand the place and how it works.JarrahTree 09:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

take care[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jahan_Kalantar_(lawyer)

smells like ( that is there are particular parts of the editing )

a selfie - despite your assertions on your user page. Take care!

JarrahTree 09:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]