User talk:GMH Melbourne/Archive 2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

Pop up links[edit]

Yesterday's main page had an atticle on the House of Habsburg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Habsburg). When hovering over the link to "Holy Roman Empire" in the third papagraph, a complexity weird pop up appeared about non existent organisations and people. Today it has been fixed, but I took a screen shot of it. The link though when clicked was to the real wiki Holy roman empire page.

How do these pop ups work? Yesterday I thought I would try to fix it but obviously that has now been done. But i am interested anyway

Thanks Virgobeach (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, GMH Melbourne![edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alphington Paper Mill[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alphington Paper Mill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 04:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alphington Paper Mill[edit]

The article Alphington Paper Mill you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Alphington Paper Mill for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lindsay Thompson Portrait.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lindsay Thompson Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paulie Stewart moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Paulie Stewart. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and see WP:MUSICBIO for what constitutes notability for a music biography. All four references fail WP:IS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG: I have moved the article back to mainspace. At least 2 of the 4 sources are independent of the subject (SMH & The Guardian). If this isn't sufficient, there are other sources that exist ( [1] [2] [3] & more ). If you still believe that isn't sufficient to meet GNG, I suggest taking it to AfD. GMH Melbourne (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read those two sources? They include interview material and, as such, are not WP:IS. See WP:MUSICBIO and I will indeed go to AFD. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the purpose of draft space is to give time for an article to get made with adequate sources before being moved into main article space. If you have additional sources, they should be added to the draft before it is made into an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I'd let you know that this article you moved to main space twice is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulie Stewart. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification[edit]

Hi, GMH Melbourne. I'm just posting to let you know that List of chief commissioners of the Victoria Police – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 16. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash[edit]

On 18 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Lockheed EC-130Q aircraft crashed after performing a waterbombing just 190 feet (58 m) in the air? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 17,814 views (742.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Npp[edit]

@GMH Melbourne Patrol the page Fisayomi Abebi Thanks. Jutos222 (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GMH, I'd love to get your advice on something if possible. I recently put Monique Ryan up as a FAC, which was not successful.

One of the comments that was made was that The 'Member of Parliament' section is rather bitsy, and jumps from issue to issue. It would be better to discuss how Ryan has positioned herself as an MP, including her overall voting record rather than listing various issues of at times unclear importance (for instance, on what types of issues does she side with the government and on what does she side with the the opposition? Has she successfully influenced government policy?)

I'm not really sure how to rework the "Member of Parliament" section to make this change. The trouble with writing about independent MPs is that they take public positions on a huge variety of things, and so putting their statements chronologically would mean jumping between lots of topics. Writing about government MPs seems much easier as you can't attribute decisions of a government solely to them, so ordering chronologically is fine. Grouping Ryan's statements by topic seems to me to make more sense, but it still makes it a bit choppy.

Do you have any advice about how to restructure the Member of Parliament section? Any thoughts are appreciated and totally fine if you're not sure!

GraziePrego (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest perhaps rewriting the Member of Parliament section to be a chronological biography of her time in parliament and maybe have a seperate section on her political views. I would also recommend a Peer Review as you'll be able to get many people nitpicking on the finer details to get the article near-perfect. There are also a few articles (here) that are Australian political biographies and FA status which can provide you with a bit of a structure/ guide on the best way to do this. GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great thank you :) GraziePrego (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Premier of Victoria is being copyedited[edit]


The copyedit of Premier of Victoria has been completed[edit]

The article 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash and Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 12:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash for comments about the article, and Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Thank you for taking the time to review and for all your work and helpful suggestions! GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, GMH Melbourne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]