User talk:GXXF


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #150

User:GXXF	User talk:GXXF	Special:Contributions/GXXF	User:GXXF/Userboxes	User:GXXF/Articles	User:GXXF/Files	User:GXXF/Tools
Main	Talk page	Contributions	Userboxes	Articles	Files	Tools

Main Talk page Userboxes Articles

This is GXXF's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2

January 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. czar 14:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Soetermans. An edit that you recently made to Midway Games seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Soetermans. T / C 11:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Midway Games shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- ferret (talk) 21:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject banner[edit]

Hi GXXF,

I removed {{WikiProject Video games}}, as that is intended for video game articles. Were you looking for {{User WPVG}}? --Soetermans. T / C 14:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You realize your talk page is not semi-protected, right? --Soetermans. T / C 16:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or that nobody except you edited your user page? --Soetermans. T / C 16:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About your recent edits[edit]

Hi GXXF,

Have you noticed that most of your recent edits have been reverted? It might be a good idea to read the guidelines, to get a sense what is useful for Wikipedia. --Soetermans. T / C 10:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Templates are not permitted signatures per WP:SIG#NT. Please revise your signature accordingly. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give to me some recomentations? GXXF (talk | contributions) 17:51,9/25/2016}

Recommendations are here: WP:Signatures. Signature should not be transcluded because that runs contrary to the very purpose of the signature. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I now have an custom signature. GXXF T • C 19:27,9/26/2016

It's not working The time stamp is not automatic it seems. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Main Pages[edit]

Template:Main Pages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #150

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:GXXF/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! GXXF, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, GXXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Murph9000 (talk) 20:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

I've deleted your RfA. You are not ready to become an administrator. I suggest you stick to improving your editing, almost all of which leaves a lot to be desired.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Netto-kat[edit]

I declined your speedy deletion nomination of User:Netto-kat. According to the G7 criterion blanking in the user space is not considered a deletion request. The only way a page in user space can be speedy deleted as a user request is if they explicitly request the page be deleted. -- GB fan 23:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NOEDITSECTION[edit]

Template:NOEDITSECTION has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ‑ Iridescent 19:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:SystemFolder9.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SystemFolder9.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hopewell Township[edit]

Why are you insisting that a former member of the Hopewell Township Committee's personal views about changing parties remain on our Township wiki page? by leaving him on our page, you are disrespecting all former members of the Township Committee who are NOT airing themselves on this page. If you insist on reversing our posts to delete him entirely from the site (as he is no longer on the Committee), then you need to add ALL former members on the site as well, and all of their reasons for changing parties to suit their own personal agendas. I don't think you have the history or knowledge to do so, so kindly permanently remove Harvey Lester from that site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbbshell (talk • contribs) 21:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:ME-fact. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 04:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gardenia tubifera. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Godsy, you may be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding ongoing vandalism and bad faith editing. The thread is GXXF. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, GXXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

The concerns raised at ANI[edit]

As you are aware, there is an open case at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your recent edits. Specific examples that are being discussed include the report you made at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention here and the speedy deletion tag you placed here. These edits are examples of both tagging and reporting that are grossly inappropriate and not in accordance to the relevant policies and guidelines.

Due to the consistency and the level of inappropriateness behind these edits, I am placing you on a final warning basis regarding your tagging of pages and your participation at noticeboards. Please review and understand the relevant policies and guidelines before you proceed with any Wikipedia processes or procedures like this. For example: the guidelines for speedy deletion are located here, and the proper use of Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention is here - please review them carefully and message me (or any other experienced editors) if you have any questions about them. If you continue to add inappropriate tags or create inappropriate reports on noticeboards (or engage in any other Wikipedia process in an inappropriate manner), you will be blocked from editing.

If you have any questions or concerns, you can respond to the ANI thread by clicking here. Thank you :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, GXXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 21:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Sockpuppet tag[edit]

Hello. Would you mind explaining your rationale for placing this sockpuppet tag. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any explanation forthcoming? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The template should be removed until an acceptable rationale is given. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to get far without explanations. I'll assume good faith and consider it merely reckless. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-retired ?[edit]

Maybe {{Wikibreak}} would be more correct. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done GXXF T • C 17:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:lowercase sigmabot III[edit]

Hello. I notice you've used the emergency stop for Lowercase sigmabot III,[1] and also Lowercase sigmabot.[2] Is there a problem, or some other reason to stop the bots? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doing... GXXF T • C 18:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done GXXF T • C 18:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no reason then, I suggest you don't do it. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was a test. GXXF T • C 18:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those things are not something for testing, please do never do such thing again. Qed237 (talk) 19:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GXXF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will no longer vandalise Wikidia again, I promise.

Decline reason:

I'll need much more before I can even begin to consider discussing this with Huon. You'll need to demonstrate you understand why you were blocked and provide suitable assurances that such behaviour will not be repeated. Nick (talk) 22:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Mlpearc may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 17:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Anonblock-vandal[edit]

Template:Anonblock-vandal has been nominated for merging with Template:Anonblock. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nintendo Advanced Video System (retouched).png[edit]

The file File:Nintendo Advanced Video System (retouched).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sure why we would possibly want a downscaled PNG version of a photo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 11:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]