User talk:Ghfj007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome ghfj007!

China[edit]

Could you please explain the edits you are making to China on the talk page of the article? People are, no offense, finding your edits controversial and asserting a pro-People's Republic of China point of view. It seems unnecessary to fill all the descriptions of Taiwan or the Republic of China as de-facto or internationally unrecognized and the article could do very well without them, as it's already explained in Republic of China that the state's political status is controversial and questioned. Coming to Talk:China to discuss your edits would be beneficial. Thank you. Cowman109Talk 15:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Ideogram 14:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

You aren't supposed to stop discussing and go back to editing the article when you don't get your way. You're supposed to keep discussing until some kind of agreement is reached. --Ideogram 14:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent vandalism[edit]

I have absolutely nothing to do with Alexander 007 and I am deeply offended that you have said I am a vandal. Can you give me examples of vandalism? Ghfj007 15:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I WOULD LIKE TO REPEAT THAT I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ALEXANDER 007. Ghfj007 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catholic-ew.org.uk/dioc/ukrainian.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians. Then you should do one of the following:

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --Interiot 06:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Church cathedral in Great Britain template[edit]

Hi there, thanks for your contruibutions. I would really prefer to keep the template to those of the Ro an Catholic church controled from the Vatican. However, I have no objection to including the Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians and others, it was just that they were extremely long and damaged the aestetics of the template. If you want to include them could you create a subsection with a small header in the template saying something like "cathedrals of other branches of the Catholic church" and also try to find a way of shrtening the entries! Thankyou Lofty 14:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where I have failed to assume good faith, but if you point out where I have given that impression then I will try to avoid doing so in future. My parents' occupations should be irrelevant (WP:NPA). TSP 17:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Acknowledge that Republic of China Is Still at Least a de Facto Country[edit]

請尊重中華民國政權在臺灣仍然存在的事實 勿持續在國泰及港龍航空的頁面上以"Chinese Taipei"字眼取代Wikipedia所規範的"China, Republic of" 若您有心促成兩岸統一 就必須承認中華人民共和國與中華民國分治兩岸的現狀Ernestnywang 02:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about.[edit]

I did make a single edit about a month ago, but it was to the 'On The Plane' section: [1]. It was also quite minor.

I had nothing to do with the controversy section; that was simply reverted as a side-effect of reverting what I did. Anyway, it seems as though there is consensus to leave it out, and I generally tend to go with the group in these situations; I was simply reverting something that had been changed for no apparant reason. HalfShadow 17:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sea shanty?[edit]

You asked a question on the sea shanty talk page about some kind of reference in the TV show The Simpsons. Alas, I don't think you will get an answer unless you provide more information in your question, particularly the title of the epsiode you are asking about. Hope this helps. Crypticfirefly 02:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait,what refrence to the TV show"The Simpsons"?Also,if you are wondering who I am,I'm kinda new here.MKguy42192 (talk) 09:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)MKguy42192MKguy42192 (talk) 09:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template on Catholic Dioceses in the United States[edit]

Just ran into your template when I nearly overinstalled it on an alphabetically early diocese. Yours looks nice and is accurate. It does take up a bit of screen space though when completed.

This is not nearly as comprehensive as yours but it's worth thinking about since we didn't match notes before. (may have to be deleted here to accomodate additional remarks) Student7 00:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
{{R-C provinces in the United States}}


Spam in LANPASS[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on LANPASS, by Russavia (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because LANPASS is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting LANPASS, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berks arms.gif
Hello, Ghfj007! I'd like to invite you to join the Berkshire WikiProject. It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Berkshire-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of members.


If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

Seaserpent85 01:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Gatwick Airport Prayer Rooms, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cotai Jet[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cotai Jet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mission Fleg (talk) 10:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of bus routes in the Thames Valley[edit]

I have flagged this page for deletion, as it esentially duplicates the List of bus routes in Slough and could have definition problems over what forms the Thames Valley. You may want to comment. Grblundell (talk) 15:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HK passport travel to Mali[edit]

Hello and thank you for contributing to passport related pages. Just to let you know why I had to remove Mali from the HK passport visa-on-arrival list : While HK passport holders may have their visa stamped into their passport at the airport in Mali, this requires that they contact Mali police in advance for permission to enter the country. [2] Countries where such a permission/visa has to acquired in advance are generally not listed under VOA in passport lists, as listing them as such would make some of the most restrictive countries in the world (e.g. Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Bhutan, Libya) "visa-free" or "visa-on-arrival". Passportguy (talk) 17:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Declaration Form for Holders of the Macau SAR Permanent Resident Identity Card to Hong Kong SAR[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Declaration Form for Holders of the Macau SAR Permanent Resident Identity Card to Hong Kong SAR, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Trevor Marron (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Ghfj007! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Bohdan Dzyurakh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jan Martyniak - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Catholic dioceses of the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Visa policy of the People's Republic of China has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an encyclopedic topic, factually inaccurate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Basket of Puppies 01:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Visa policy of Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an encyclopedic topic, factually inaccurate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Basket of Puppies 01:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Visa policy of Macau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an encyclopedic topic, factually inaccurate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Basket of Puppies 01:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated Visa policy of the People's Republic of China, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy of the People's Republic of China. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Basket of Puppies 13:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated Visa policy of Hong Kong, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy of Hong Kong. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Basket of Puppies 13:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated Visa policy of Macau, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy of Macau. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Basket of Puppies 13:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]


ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cotai Jet logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cotai Jet logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of Arms of Bishop Jan Martyniak.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of Arms of Bishop Jan Martyniak.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Visa policies and requirements in Greater China[edit]

Template:Visa policies and requirements in Greater China has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Szqecs (talk) 01:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Chomnycky coat of arms.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Chomnycky coat of arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Catholic dioceses in England and Wales has been nominated for merging with Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chaplaincies of the Catholic Church in England and Wales has been nominated for merging with Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:36, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Macaupass green.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macaupass green.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]