User talk:Grazina12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Noctivagus moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Noctivagus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. While the article has many sources, as far as I can tell none of them are reliable, as they are almost all to either database entries, blogs, band camp pages, or facebook pages. Try to find some coverage in newspapers or magazines: 3 good reliable sources are better than 25 bad ones. For more information please see WP:RS.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguill talk 17:57, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Noctivagus, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noctivagus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noctivagus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctivagus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 21:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]