User talk:Henery Copt

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Henery Copt, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

File:Statue of poor man in San Francisco.jpg

Statue of Mahatma Gandhi in San Francisco waving Hello

Statue of Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948) in San Francisco[edit]

Welcome to Henery's Talk Page -- Henery Copt (talk)

October 2014[edit]

Your recent editing history at Yom Kippur War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
The article is part of WP:ARBPIA and it under WP:1RR rule you made two reverts please self revert Shrike (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Henery_Copt reported by User:Shrike (Result: ). Thank you. Shrike (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yom Kippur War[edit]

Hello, on Yom Kippur War article you removed a claim(Israeli victory) supported by 8 sources for no reason and added controversial data. When your edit was reverted you should have discussed it on talk page and seek for consensus. Please revert your last edit[1] and discuss it or you will be reported. Please follow the rules Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:Consensus. Infantom (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that you have just violated the WP:1RR imposed on the article and you are likely to face a block for this. There is already a discussion concerning you on the administrators' noticeboard. My advice is (assuming you don't get blocked for 24 hours) to refrain from resorting to such behavior in the future and to discuss those changes on the article's talk page by providing accurate reasoning of why you consider your version of the article to be the correct one. It's really not worth edit-warring. Regards, Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, please stop referring to everything as vandalism (try to read what it means on Wikipedia first). In this case, your accusations are far from being correct and many editors might consider this offensive and not complying with WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Thank you, Fitzcarmalan (talk) 15:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fitzcarmalan, are you addressing me? Infantom (talk) 16:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links and categories[edit]

Hello, please do not add links to countries and other common terms, as you did at Lee Cox (athlete), because this is considered overlinking. Also, don't add top-level categories to articles, as you did at Thomas Rice (1734), where you added Category:Clergy. Regarding some of your other edits, it's not a good idea to edit in areas where you have strong opinions about issues; see the essay beware of the tigers. Graham87 16:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dexterous B and a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]