User talk:Iammissnobody

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiGuide Welcome[edit]

Hello Iammissnobody. Welcome to the English version of Wikipedia
Thank you for your participation in this project. We hope that you will stay to contribute and that you will find the collaboration process enjoyable.
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that started in 2001 and is free for all to use and edit under certain guidelines and principles that all users should understand and adhere to.
These principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information.
The five pillars of Wikipedia.
The fundamental principles of the project.
Help.
How to get help.
Tutorial.
This tutorial is a basic guide to editing.
Your user pages and your sandbox.
How to experiment and edit in your user space.
Mentoring program.
Request help in your first steps of editing.
How to start a page.
Help on creating your first article.
Things to avoid.
How to avoid common errors and mistakes.
Style Guide.
How to write in an acceptable style
.
Main policies of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.
Frequently asked questions.
Some common questions and their answers.
Help Desk.
Here you can ask other editors for assistance
Quick reference.
A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.

This is your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you must put your signature by signing with four ~~~~ (just as I have done) or by pressing the button in the editor bar as shown here in the picture. By the way, you don't need to sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted. Another valuable page that may provide information and assistance is User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. My name is Buster7. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance and contact information. Good Luck editing!

```Buster Seven Talk 12:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ty! nMyghet (talk) 19:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i have made the corrections nMyghet (talk) 19:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Iammissnobody! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i have made citations nMyghet (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mohd Bakri Mohd Zinin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already asked for help. ty. nMyghet (talk) 19:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Now Smash Hits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backwards. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhu al-Qarnayn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Enki. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Enki, you may be blocked from editing. Woodroar (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lel nMyghet (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Annh07. --Mr Fink (talk) 19:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iammissnobody (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to sincerely appeal the recent warning/block on my account. I must stress that I was not active on Wikipedia during the time of the warning, and I find it deeply concerning that my actions are being misinterpreted. I want to assure you that if I had been on Wikipedia, I would have been engaging constructively, particularly on discussions related to Malacca/Melaka. My interest lies in contributing positively to Wikipedia, not and never in vandalising pages. I need Wikipedia as much as an 80s kid needs an encyclopedia book set. I understand the severity of the situation and accept any consequences that may arise. However, I'm genuinely perplexed by this situation and would appreciate your understanding and assistance in resolving it. I am fully committed to abiding by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and will do whatever is necessary to rectify this misunderstanding. I kindly request your guidance on how best to address this issue and demonstrate my sincere intentions. Thank you for considering my appeal. nMyghet (talk) 2:44 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Answer to Deepfriedokra: Upon reviewing the Wikipedia:Wiki Guides and Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, I understand the importance of providing a concise and clear explanation of the circumstances leading to the block, along with a commitment to constructive editing in the future.

Chronology:

-edited Enki page on 9 March 2024 on 21:17, first warning from Annh07 two minutes after, and from Woodroar about four hours after (as the previous comment above using UTC format).

-152.7.255.239 reverted it back at 22:15, by putting the replaced content with [[ 02:00, 10 March 2024‎ Iammissnobody talk contribs‎ m 20 bytes −44,292‎ ←Replaced content with ' {DEFAULTSORT:eva}' undo Tags: Replaced Reverted Visual edit].

- For transparency, here is the basic info on my current DNS with my ISP provider: IP Address: 175.140.107.9 ASN: 4788 City: Shah Alam State/Region: Selangor Country: Malaysia Postal Code: 40170 ISP: Telekom Malaysia Berhad Time Zone: +08:00

Kindly inform me if my IP is different from your end, as there is no valid reason for me to mask my IP while editing Wikipedia.

-I have no direct access to Wikipedia after that, and I do apologise if the time is differently displayed between my user talk-page and Enki page. I have no explanation nor knowledge on that, but I can assure you that a decision was made upon me outside Wikipedia scope to be offline, or else I would have seen my clear mistake after I wrote "lel", which we have seen now I did not.

In that same spirit, I recognise that my previous response lacked specificity regarding the reasons for the block and how my actions may have contributed. I apologise for any confusion.

Moving forward, I intend to take the following steps to prevent similar issues and contribute positively to Wikipedia to ensure this stays indefinitely as a mistake and not a serial behaviour:

Understanding the Concerns: I will thoroughly review the reasons for the block and ensure I understand how my actions may have led to it. I will familiarise myself with relevant policies and guidelines, particularly the WP:five pillars.

Improved Communication: I will make an effort to communicate transparently with the community, adhering to WP:Etiquette guidelines. I acknowledge the importance of timely responses and will ensure better communication in the future.

Commitment to Truth and Accuracy: My main and primary motivation for finally taking up editing Wikipedia despite joining since 2012 is to pursue truth, accuracy, credible information, gain new credible knowledge and always practicing WP:BRD in all my statements and facts that I have included here. I am not here to promote fabricated and biased information.

Constructive Editing: I commit to making constructive contributions to Wikipedia, particularly in areas related to things I am working on such as issue of Malacca/Melaka, while adhering to the principles of WP:NPOV. I will report any instances of alleged abuses or biasness for you to pay attention to, or not, depending on your collective decision.

Avoiding Disruptive Behavior: I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's conduct standards outlined in the Wikipedia:Blocking policy. I assure you that I do not have any other registered accounts on Wikipedia, nor do I intend to engage in WP:Sockpuppetry, as it violates Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Such behavior can lead to edit warring and disrupt the editing process, which I am fully dedicated to avoiding.

Seeking Guidance: I will seek guidance from experienced editors or administrators if I have any questions or uncertainties about my edits or account activity, as outlined in the WP:Verifiability policy.

I understand the gravity of the situation and am committed to rectifying my mistakes. In all honesty, my connection to Wikipedia will be unavailable after this message sent until next week day (Monday, Mar 18 2024) , and I hope you're kindly giving me a benefit of a doubt and I will address all your inquiry accordingly. Again, I sincerely apologise for the "lel", the enki rogue edit, and for even bothered proposing to correct an inaccuracy in Malacca page. I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal. Sincerely,--nMyghet (talk) 21:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]



.

is accepted. After extensive discussion there and with the consent of the blocking admin, I am lifting the block. --Yamla (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. Thank you for your kind understanding with the rest of the blocking admin. <3 nMyghet (talk) 02:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ToadetteEdit were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Toadette (Let's talk together!) 10:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]