User talk:Imdavid21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Imdavid21, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 16:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please return the favor

When you make use of Wikipedia's desks (Help desk, Village pump, and the Reference desk), please consider putting some time in as a volunteer by reading and answering some questions at whichever desk you think you will be the most helpful. Remember: the Help desk always needs help, and questions asked at the Reference desk span the breadth of all human knowledge. You're likely to know the answer to some of the questions.

Read more:
Become a Wikipedia tipster
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bagzamilleon (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Imdavid21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bagzamilleon[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bagzamilleon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VVikingTalkEdits 13:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Submit for review[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Submit for review, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~Amkgp ✉ 04:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bagzamilleon[edit]

The page Bagzamilleon has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G4: deleted today at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAGZAMILLEON. This version existed as a duplicate unbeknownst to any of those participants (including me as closer).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre Balian[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pierre Balian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CapitalVia (June 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keka HR (June 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please merge and clean up this version.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice[edit]

Information icon Hello, Imdavid21. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for enlightening me. I appreciate it. Imdavid21 (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CapitalVia (June 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"CapitalVia Global acquires DreamGains Financials.[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. And never LinkedIN, please
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 18:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:CapitalVia has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CapitalVia. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 20:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made the changes. Imdavid21 (talk) 11:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominic Nicholson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dominic Nicholson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAGZAMILLEON. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thakur Ji Pathak (July 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please don’t resubmit without improving this draft either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 03:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ProcMart (July 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CapitalVia (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 00:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

paid?[edit]

For how many of the articles and drafts above have you been paid?

Were you paid for updating Draft:Zeeshan Khan?

You may want to update your user page., and put a declaration in your edit summaries. DGG ( talk ) 19:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was paid for updating all the articles above by Dominic Nicholson, with the exception of Thakur Ji Pathak. Imdavid21 (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for highlighting. Now onwards, I will put a declaration in my edit summaries. Imdavid21 (talk) 02:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bhartiya HQ.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bhartiya HQ.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zeeshan Khan (businessman) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zeeshan Khan (businessman). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What is your association with User:Sanjaysharma5882?

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not associated with the mentioned person. However, the person may or may not be associated with Zeeshan Khan. Imdavid21 (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeeshan Khan (businessman) (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

This draft was rejected last year and has not been materially improved. Some, but not all, of the promotional language has been removed, and there was not much neutral description and still is not much.

Do not resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or another draft about the subject without discussing it with the reviewers. This does not mean that the discussion will result in the draft being accepted. It does mean that resubmitting it without discussion will result either in this draft being nominated for deletion or a report being made to request a partial block or other sanctions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on my talk page[edit]

You asked me, on my talk page, whether you can make the needed changes to the draft and resubmit it. I will repeat what I said on my talk page. When a page has been nominated for deletion, the only place to discuss it further is in the deletion discussion. You may ask any questions about the draft at the deletion talk page. It would have been better to ask before resubmitting a rejected draft. You were gaming the system by resubmitting a draft that had been rejected without asking what could be done to improve the draft. The community holds paid editors to at least the same standard as volunteer editors. You may ask any questions at the deletion talk page, and there is no guarantee that any changes will be accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Imdavid21! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please let me know what exactly am I missing., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Furniture in Fashion (December 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Routine PR and financial reporting does not signify notability. WP:ORGCRITE
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tagishsimon (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ProcMart[edit]

Hello, Imdavid21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ProcMart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Sam Sailor 14:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Although you have not disclosed this, were you paid to create Draft:Bhartiya Group? Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate) (March 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kashmorwiki were:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 18:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CapitalVia (March 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate) (March 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kashmorwiki were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 12:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate) (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Continuosly submitted like an advertisement
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 10:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me where I'm going wrong. I have tried changing each and every sentence. Please let me know where EXACTLY does the problem lie. I will do my best to fix it. Imdavid21 (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimla Siddharth Lalbhai (May 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
If we look closely... the same news has been released on multiple media platforms and then used as references at Wikipedia. Can it be considered as WP:REFBOMB? -
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 06:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NLS Pharmaceutics moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, NLS Pharmaceutics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 03:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for letting me know. I was updating the article with relevant citations as you moved it to drafts.

I will submit it for review as and when I'm done.

Thank you again. Imdavid21 (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:NLS Pharma.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NLS Pharma.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. When you provide a citation to a source, please make sure that the source mentions the stuff it is being cited for. For example: a link to chandandiagnostic.com leads the user to a page that says that

  • Chandan Healthcare Ltd is based at Biotech Park, Kursi Road, Lucknow.
  • The company has 59 major diagnostic centres
  • 17,288,350 patients have been served
  • The company has at least 154 specialists
  • The company has a paramedical team of at least 1651 people
  • The company has at least 900 collection centres

But the page does not mention whether they have any facilities in places other than Lucknow. If you think they have facilities in Allahabad, you need to find a page that mentions that.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of minor edits checkbox[edit]

Information icon Hi Imdavid21! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Allahabad that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NLS Pharmaceutics (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The notability criteria you are looking to fulfil is WP:NCORP. The refs given here don't establish notability, I'll give a ref-by-ref breakdown below:
  • refs 1 and 2 - Patent filings, examples of trivial coverage
  • ref 3: Announcement of a merger, per NCORP another example of trivial coverage. Wording makes me also suspect that this was based off a press release
  • refs 4 and 6 - once again trivial coverage per NCORP, additionally the "source" is the company and the site appears to distribute such articles in return for payment
  • ref 5, 8, 9 ,10 further examples of trivial coverage - changes in share/bond prices, etc
  • ref 7 is from the mail, an unreliable source
  • refs 11 and 12 from PR release sites, unreliable
  • ref 13 looks more promising, but on closer inspection seems to also be a regurgitation of a press release. Source of the article is "cision" which leads back to prnewswire.
All the best,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pahunkat (talk) 12:41, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siddharth Kasturbhai Lalbhai (July 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of the minor edits check box[edit]

Information icon Hi Imdavid21! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Allahabad that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Adding a new citation is not a minor edit.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhartiya Group[edit]

Information icon Hello, Imdavid21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhartiya Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Avaamo Inc.[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Avaamo Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CapitalVia[edit]

Information icon Hello, Imdavid21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CapitalVia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avaamo Inc (September 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Largely press releases some from unreliable sources like Crunchbase.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CapitalVia[edit]

Hello, Imdavid21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CapitalVia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NLS Pharmaceutics[edit]

Information icon Hello, Imdavid21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NLS Pharmaceutics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Imdavid21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Avaamo Inc[edit]

Information icon Hello, Imdavid21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Avaamo Inc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhartiya Group[edit]

Hello, Imdavid21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhartiya Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhartiya Group (Conglomerate)[edit]

Hello, Imdavid21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhartiya Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Avaamo Inc[edit]

Hello, Imdavid21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avaamo Inc".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NLS Pharma.jpeg[edit]

Notice

The file File:NLS Pharma.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Draft:NLS Pharmaceutics. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Imdavid21&oldid=1104319528"